Comparison of dry matter and neutral detergent fibre degradation of fibrous feedstuffs as determined with in situ and in vitro gravimetric procedures

Animal Feed Science and Technology

Volumn 161, Issue 1-2, 2010, Pages 49-57

  Trujillo, A I ^a   Marichal, M de J ^a   Carriquiry, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA REPÚBLICA   (Uruguay)

Author keywords

Agro industrial by products; Degradability; Forages; In situ; In vitro; Neutral detergent fibre

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957956101     PISSN: 03778401     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. AFRC Energy and Protein Requirements of Ruminants. An Advisory Manual Prepared by the AFRC Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients 1993, CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
2. Altman D., Bland J. Measurements in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 1983, 32:307-317.
3. AOAC Official Methods of Analysis 1990, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC. 15th ed.
4. Bargo F., Rearte D.H., Santini F.J., Muller L.D. Ruminal digestion by dairy cows grazing winter oats pasture supplemented with different levels and sources of protein. J. Dairy Sci. 2001, 84:2260-2272.
5. Bargo, F., 2002. Feeding systems combining pasture with concentrate and total mixed rations for high producing dairy cows. Ph.D. Thesis. The Pennsylvania State University.
6. Barrios-Urdaneta A., Fondevila M., Castrillo C. Effect of supplementation with different proportions of barley grain or citrus pulp on the digestive utilization of ammonia-treated straw by sheep. Anim. Sci. 2003, 76:309-317.
7. Bossen D., Mertens D., Weisbjerg M.R. Influence of fermentation methods on neutral detergent fiber degradation parameters. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91:1464-1476.
8. Ceballos A., Noguera R., Bolivar D., Posada S. Comparación de las técnicas in situ de los sacos de nylon e in vitro (DaisyII) para estimar la cinética de degradación de alimentos para rumiantes (abstract in English). Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 2008, 20(108). Retrieved June 12, 2009, from. http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd20/7/ceba20108.htm.
9. DePeters E., Fadel J., Arosemena A. Digestion kinetics of neutral fiber and chemical composition within some selected by-product feedstuffs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1997, 67:127-140.
10. Dewhurst R.J., Hepper D., Webster A. Comparison of in sacco and in vitro techniques for estimating the rate and extent of rumen fermentation of a range of dietary ingredients. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1995, 51:211-229.
11. Dhanoa M.S. On the analysis of dacron bag data for low degradability feeds. Grass Forage Sci. 1988, 43:441-443.
12. Eisenhardt Jr., W.A., Saleeb, F.Z., McKay, R.P., Zeller, B.L., 2009. Method for producing dried citrus pulp. US Patent 4,477,481.
13. Elizalde J.C., Rearte D., Santini J. Corn silages supplementation of cows grazing winter oats. Dynamics of digestion and ruminal environment. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1992, 38:161-174.
14. Grant R.J., Mertens D. Impact of in vitro fermentation techniques upon kinetics of fiber digestion. J. Dairy Sci. 1992, 75:1263-1272.
15. Hoffman P.S., Sievert J., Shaver R., Welch D., Combs D.K. In situ dry matter, protein, and fiber digestion of perennial forages. J. Dairy Sci. 1993, 76:2632-2643.
16. Jarrige R. Ruminant Nutrition: Recommended Allowances and Feed Tables 1989, INRA, Paris.
17. Julier B., Lila M., Furstonss V., Travers V., Huyhe C. Measurement of cell-wall digestibility of ruminant feedstuffs. Comparison of methods and inoculum source. J. Dairy Sci. 1999, 83:2289-2294.
18. Lindberg J.E., Knutsson P.G. Effect of bag pore size on the loss of particulate matter and on the degradation of cell wall fibre. Agric. Environ. 1981, 6:171-182.
19. Marichal M.de.J., Carriquiry M., Astigarraga L., Trujillo A.I. N fractionation, degradability, intestinal digestibility, and adequacy for ruminal microbial activity of cultivated legumes. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 2010, 22(23.). Retrieved February 9, 2010 from. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd22/2/mari22023.htm.
20. Mertens D.R. Rate and extent of digestion. Quantitative Aspects of Ruminant Digestion and Metabolism 1993, 13-51. CAB International University Press, Cambridge, UK. J.M. Forbes, J. France (Eds.).
21. Mould F.L., Kliem K.E., Krystallidou E. A review and simplification of the in vitro incubation medium. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2005, 123-124, 155-172.
22. Mould F., Nordheim H. Dry matter and neutral-detergent fibre degradation profiles of roughages obtained using the ANKOM in vitro system. In vitro Techniques for Measuring Nutrient Supply to Ruminants 1998, 247-248. BSAS Occasional Publication No. 22. E.R. Deaville, E. Owen, A.T. Adesogan, C. Rymer, J.A. Huntington, T.L. Lawrence (Eds.).
23. Nocek J.E. In situ and other methods to estimate ruminal protein and energy digestibility: a review. J. Dairy Sci. 1988, 71:2051-2069.
24. NRC Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle 2000, National Academy Press, Washington, DC. Updated 7th ed.
25. NRC Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle 2001, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA. 7th ed.
26. Orskov E.R., De B., Hovell F.D., Mould F. The use of the nylon bag technique for the evaluation of feedstuffs. Trop. Anim. Prod. 1980, 5:195-213.
27. Orskov E.R., McDonald I. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J. Agric. Sci. 1979, 92:499-503.
28. Pereira J.C., Gonzalez J. Rumen degradability of dehydrated beet pulp and dehydrated citrus pulp. Anim. Res. 2004, 53(2004):99-110.
29. Preston, R.L., 2009. Typical composition of feeds for cattle and sheep. Beef magazine.
30. SAS Institute Version Release 8.2 2000, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
31. Sniffen C.F., O'Connor J.D., Van Soest P.J., Fox D.G., Russell J.B. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability. J. Anim. Sci. 1992, 70:3562-3577.
32. Tamminga S., Williams B.A. In vitro techniques as tools to predict nutrient supply in ruminants. In vitro Techniques for Measuring Nutrient Supply to Ruminants 1998, 2-11. BSAS Occasional Publication No. 22. E.R. Deaville, E. Owen, A.T. Adesogan, C. Rymer, J.A. Huntington, T.L. Lawrence (Eds.).
33. Tilley J.M.A., Terry R.A. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Grassland Soc. 1963, 18:104-111.
34. Van Soest P.J., Robertson J.B., Lewis B. Methods for dietary fiber neutral detergent fiber, and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74:3583-3597.
35. Van Soest P.J. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant 1994, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 374 pp. 2nd ed.
36. Van Vuuren A.M., Krol-Kramer F., van der Lee R.A., Corbijn H. Protein digestion and intestinal amino acids in dairy cows fed fresh Lolium perenne with different nitrogen contents. J. Dairy Sci. 1992, 75:2215-2225.
37. Van Vuuren A.M., Van der Koelen C.J., Vroons-de J., Bruin Ryegrass versus corn starch or beet pulp fiber diet effects on digestion and intestinal amino acids in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1993, 76:2692-2700.
38. Varel V., Kreikemeier K. Comparison of in vitro and in situ digestibility methods. J. Anim. Sci. 1995, 73:578-582.
39. Varga G.A., Hoover W.H. Rate and extent of neutral detergent fiber digestion in feedstuffs in situ. J. Dairy Sci. 1983, 66:2109-2116.
40. Vogel K., Pedersen J.F., Masterson S.D., Toy J. Evaluation of a filter bag system for NDF, ADF, and IVDMD forage analysis. Crop Sci. 1999, 39:276-279.
41. Weiss W.P. Estimation of digestibility of forages by laboratory methods. Proceedings of the National Conference on Forage Quality, Evaluation, and Utilization 1994, 644-681. G.C. Fahey, L.E. Moser, D.R. Mertens, M. Collins (Eds.).