Comparison of the nylon bag in situ technique and in vitro (Daisy II) to estimate the kinetics of degradation of feeds for ruminants;Comparación de las técnicas in situ de los sacos de nylon e in vitro (DaisyII) para estimar la cinética de degradación de alimentos para rumiantes

Livestock Research for Rural Development

Volumn 20, Issue 7, 2008, Pages

  Ceballos, A ^a   Noguera, R R ^a   Bolivar D M ^b   Posada, S L ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE ANTIOQUIA   (Colombia)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA   (Colombia)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Bland Altman; Degradation; Food evaluation; Ruminants

Indexed keywords

BOVIDAE;

EID: 48249123178     PISSN: None     EISSN: 01213784     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Altman D G and Bland J M 1983 Measurement in medicine: The analysis of method comparison studies. The statistician 32: 307-317
2. Ankom Technology 2008 Procedures for fiber and in vitro analysis [consultada: 8 enero 2008] URL: http://www.ankom.com/09_procedures/ Crude%20Fiber%20Method%20A200.pdf ; http://www.ankom.com/09_procedures/ Daisy%20method.pdf
3. Bland J M and Altman D G 1986 Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The lancet 1. 307-310 http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~mb55/meas/ba.htm
4. Colombatto D 2000 PhD Thesis, The University of Reading UK.
5. De Figueiredo M, Mbhele A, Zondi J and Majola W 2000 A comparative study between the determination of dry matter digestibility in vitro and in vivo. South African Journal of Animal Science 30 (1): 47-48
6. Godden S M, Lissemore K D, Kelton D F, Lumsden J H, Leslie K E and Walton J S 2000 Analytic validation of an infrared milk urea assay and effects of sample acquisition factors on milk urea results. Journal of Dairy Science 83:435-442 http://jds.fass.org/cgi/reprint/83/3/435.pdf
7. Julier B, Lila M, Furstoss V, Travers V and Huyghe C 1999 Measurement of cell-wall digestibility in lucerne using the filter bag technique. Animal Feed Science and Technology 79. 239-245
8. Mabjeesh S, Cohen M and Arieli 2000 A in vitro methods for measuring the dry matter digestibility of ruminant feedstuffs. Comparison of methods and inoculum source. Journal of Dairy Science 83: 2289-2294 http://jds.fass.org/cgi/reprint/83/10/2289
9. Mauricio R M, Owen E, Mould F L, Givens D I, Theodorou M K, France J, Davies D R and Dhanoa M S 2001 Comparison of bovine rumen liquor and bovine faeces as inoculum for an in vitro gas production technique for evaluating forages. Animal Feed Science and Technology 89:33-48
10. Mould F L and Nordheim H 1998 British Society of Animal Science. British Society of Animal Science, Reading, UK 22: 329-331
11. Nocek J E 1988 In situ and other methods to estimate ruminal protein and energy digestibility: a review. Journal of Dairy Science 71 (8): 2051-2069 http://jds.fass.org/cgi/reprint/71/8/2051
12. Ørskov F R and McDonald 1979 The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92: 499-503
13. Pérez J 1997 Sistemas para a estimativa de digestibilidade "in vitro". Digestibilidade em ruminantes. 1 ed. Lavras - MG: Fundação de Apoio Pesquisa e Extensão
14. Posada S L 2007 Valoración de las heces y el líquido ruminal como inóculos en la técnica in vitro de producción de gases. Tesis Maestría, Universidad de Antioquia - Colombia
15. Statistical Analysis Systems, SAS® 2003 Versiòn 9.1 para windows, User's guide Statistics. Statistical Analysis System Institute. Inc; Cary, NC.
16. Theodorou M K, Williams B A, Dhanoa M S, McAllan A B and France J 1994 A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 48:185-197
17. Vogel K P, Pedersen J F, Masterson S D and Toy J J 1999 Evaluation of a filter bag system for NDF, ADF, and IVDMD forage analysis. Crop Science 39:276-279