Effects of avotermin (transforming growth factor β3) in a clinically relevant pig model of long, full-thickness incisional wounds

Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 223-232

  Laverty, Hugh G ^a   Occleston, Nick L ^a   Johnson, Mark ^a   Little, John ^a   Jones, Richard ^a   Fairlamb, David ^a   Ferguson, Mark W J ^a   O'Kane, Sharon ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PLACEBO; RECOMBINANT TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA3;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG BIOAVAILABILITY; DRUG BLOOD LEVEL; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG SAFETY; DRUG TOLERABILITY; EDEMA; ERYTHEMA; EXUDATE; FEMALE; FULL THICKNESS INCISIONAL WOUND; MALE; MINIPIG; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCAR FORMATION; WOUND; WOUND DEHISCENCE; WOUND HEALING; WOUND INFECTION;

ANIMALS; CICATRIX; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; FEMALE; MALE; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS; SWINE; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA3; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 77957947386     PISSN: 12034754     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2310/7750.2010.09069     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bayat A, McGrouther DA, FergusonMW. Skin scarring. BMJ 2003; 326:88-92.
2. Bell L, McAdams T, Morgan R, et al. Pruritus in burns: a descriptive study. J Burn Care Rehabil 1988;9:305-8.
3. Taal LA, Faber AW. Posttraumatic stress and maladjustment among adult burn survivors 1-2 years postburn. Burns 1998;24:285-92.
4. Robert R, Meyer W, Bishop S, et al. Disfiguring burn scars and adolescent self-esteem. Burns 1999;25:581-5. (Pubitemid 29440901)
5. Dorfmuller M. [Psychological management and after-care of severely burned patients]. Unfallchirurg 1995;98:213-7.
6. Young VL, Hutchison J. Insights into patient and clinician concerns about scar appearance:; semiquantitative structured surveys. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124(1):256-65.
7. Blondeel PN, Murphy JW, Debrosse D, et al. Closure of long surgical incisions with a new formulation of 2-octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive versus commercially available methods. Am J Surg 2004;188:307-13. (Pubitemid 39278291)
8. Hosnuter M, Tosun Z, Kargi E, et al. No-vertical-scar technique versus inverted T-scar technique in reduction mammoplasty: a two-center comparative study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005;29:496-502. (Pubitemid 43029782)
9. Meier K, Nanney LB. Emerging new drugs for wound repair. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2006;11:23-37.
10. ShahM, Foreman DM, Ferguson MWJ. Neutralisation of TGF-beta 1 and TGF-beta 2 or exogenous addition of TGF-beta 3 to cutaneous rat wounds reduces scarring. J Cell Sci 1995;108:985-1002.
11. Ferguson MW, O'Kane S. Scar-free healing: from embryonic mechanisms to adult therapeutic intervention. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2004;359:839-50. (Pubitemid 38673751)
12. Ferguson MW, Duncan J, Bond J, et al. Prophylactic administration of avotermin for improvement of skin scarring: three double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase I/II studies. Lancet 2009;373:1264-74.
13. Morris DE, Wu L, Zhao LL, et al. Acute and chronic animal models for excessive dermal scarring: quantitative studies. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;100:674-81. (Pubitemid 27381074)
14. Zhu KQ, Engrav LH, Gibran NS, et al. The female, red Duroc pig as an animal model of hypertrophic scarring and the potential role of the cones of skin. Burns 2003;29:649-64.
15. Sullivan TP, Eaglstein WH, Davis SC, et al. The pig as a model for human wound healing. Wound Repair Regen 2001;9:66-76.
16. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry, chronic cutaneous ulcer and burn wounds - developing products for treatment. 2006. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidance compliance regulatory information/guidance/UCM071324.pdf. Access date: April 13, 2010.
17. Dew DK, Hsu TM, Hsu LS, et al. Laser-assisted skin closure at 1.32 microns: the use of a software-driven medical laser system. Proc SPIE 1991;1422:111-5.
18. Tritle NM, Haller JR, Gray SD. Aesthetic comparison of wound closure techniques in a porcine model. Laryngoscope 2001;111:1949-51.
19. Singer AJ, McClain SA. Development of a porcine incisional wound model and novel scarring scales. Wound Repair Regen 2006;14:492-7.
20. Simhon D, Halpern M, Brosh T, et al. Immediate tight sealing of skin incisions using an innovative temperature-controlled laser soldering device: in vivo study in porcine skin. Ann Surg 2007;245:206-13. (Pubitemid 46148479)
21. Hollander DA, Erli HJ, Theisen A, et al. Standardized qualitative evaluation of scar tissue properties in an animal wound healing model. Wound Repair Regen 2003;11:150-7. (Pubitemid 36514828)
22. Good Laboratory Practice Regulations, 21 C.F.R. Part 58 (2009).
23. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD principles on Good Laboratory Practice. Revised 1997, issued January 1998. ENV/MC/CHEM (98) 17. Available at: http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/1998doc.nsf/LinkTo/env-mc- chem(98)17. April 13, 2010.
24. National Institutes of Health. Position statement on the care and use of animals in research, 1993. Available at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/ notice-files/not93-071.html.
25. Principles for the utilization and care of vertebrate animals used in testing, research, and training. Federal Register 1985. Available at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/references/phspol.htm#USGovPrinciples.
26. Paul RG, Tarlton JF, Purslow PP, et al. Biomechanical and biochemical study of a standardized wound healing model. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 1997;29:211-20.
27. Meier K, Nanney LB. Emerging new drugs for scar reduction. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2006;11:39-47.
28. Lee KK, Mehrany K, Swanson NA. Surgical revision. Dermatol Clin 2005;23:141-50.
29. Chen MA, Davidson TM. Scar management: prevention and treatment strategies. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;13:242-7.
30. Massicotte JM, Stewart RB, Poppas DP. Effects of endogenous absorption in human albumin solder for acute laser wound closure. Lasers Surg Med 1998;23:18-24.
31. Fick JL, Novo RE, Kirchhof N. Comparison of gross and histologic tissue responses of skin incisions closed by use of absorbable subcuticular staples, cutaneous metal staples, and polyglactin 910 suture in pigs. Am J Vet Res 2005;66:1975-84. (Pubitemid 43091722)
32. Kamegaya Y, Farinelli WA, Vila Echague AV, et al. Evaluation of photochemical tissue bonding for closure of skin incisions and excisions. Lasers Surg Med 2005;37:264-70.
33. Nitsch A, Pabyk A, Honig JF, et al. Cellular, histomorphologic, and clinical characteristics of a new octyl-2-cyanoacrylate skin adhesive. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005;29:53-8.
34. Jijon AJ, Gallup DG, Behzadian MA, et al. Assessment of epidermal growth factor in the healing process of clean full-thickness skin wounds. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:1658-62.
35. Quaglino D Jr, Nanney LB, Ditesheim JA, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta stimulates wound healing and modulates extracellular matrix gene expression in pig skin: incisional wound model. J Invest Dermatol 1991;97:34-42.
36. Mertz PM, Sauder DL, Davis SC, et al. IL-1 as a potent inducer of wound re-epithelization. Prog Clin Biol Res 1991;365:473-80.
37. Robertson JG, Walton PE, Dunshea F, et al. Growth hormone but not insulin-like growth factor-I improves wound strength in pigs. Wound Repair Regen 1997;5:168-74.
38. Poppas DP, Massicotte JM, Stewart RB, et al. Human albumin solder supplemented with TGF-beta 1 accelerates healing following laser welded wound closure. Lasers Surg Med 1996;19:360-8.
39. Ulrich MM, Verkerk M, Reijnen L, et al. Expression profile of proteins involved in scar formation in the healing process of full-thickness excisional wounds in the porcine model. Wound Repair Regen 2007;15:482-90.