A neuromorphic approach to computer vision

Communications of the ACM

Volumn 53, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 54-61

  Serre, Thomas ^a   Poggio, Tomaso ^b  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

20TH CENTURY; BRAIN IMAGING; COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE; GENOMICS; HUMAN GENOMES; INFORMATICS; NEUROMORPHIC APPROACH;

BIOINFORMATICS; COMPUTER VISION; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY;

COMPUTER SCIENCE;

EID: 77957945752     PISSN: 00010782     EISSN: 15577317     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1831407.1831425     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bengio, J. and Le Cun, Y. Scaling learning algorithms towards AI . In Large-Scale Kernel Machines, L. Bottou, O. Chapelle, D. DeCoste, and J. Weston, J., Eds. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2007, 321-360.
2. Chikkerur, S., Serre, T., Tan, C., and Poggio, T. What and Where: A Bayesian Inference Theory of Attention (in press). Vision Research, 2010.
3. Dean, T. A computational model of the cerebral cortex. In Proceedings of the 20th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Pittsburgh, PA, July 9-13, 2005), 938-943.
4. DiCarlo, J.J. and Cox, D.D. Untangling invariant object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Science 11, 8 (Aug. 2007), 333-341.
5. Epshtein, B., Lifshitz, I., and Ullman, S. Image interpretation by a single bottom-up top-down cycle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 38 (Sept. 2008), 14298-14303.
6. Fukushima, K. Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position. BiologicalCybernetics 36, 4 (Apr. 1980), 193-202.
7. George, D. and Hawkins, J. A hierarchical Bayesianmodel of invariant pattern recognition in the visualcortex. In Proceedings of the International JointConference on Neural Networks 3, (Montréal, July31-Aug. 4). IEEE Press, 2005, 1812-1817.
8. Grossberg, S. Towards a unified theory of neocortex:Laminar cortical circuits for vision and cognition.Progress in Brain Research 165 (2007), 79-104.
9. Hegdé, H. and Felleman, D.J. Reappraising thefunctional implications of the primate visualanatomical hierarchy. The Neuroscientist 13, 5 (2007), 416-421.
10. Heisele, B., Serre, T., and Poggio, T. A componentbasedframework for face detection and identification.International Journal of Computer Vision 74, 2 (Jan.1, 2007), 167-181.
11. Hinton, G.E. Learning multiple layers ofrepresentation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11, 10(Oct. 2007), 428-434.
12. Hung, C.P., Kreiman, G., Poggio, T., and DiCarlo, J.J.Fast read-out of object identity from macaque inferiortemporal cortex. Science 310, 5749 (Nov. 4, 2005), 863-866.
13. Jhuang, H., Serre, T., Wolf, L., and Poggio, T. Abiologically inspired system for action recognition.In Proceedings of the 11th IEEE InternationalConference on Computer Vision (Rio de Janeiro,Brazil, Oct. 14-20). IEEE Press, 2007.
14. Lee, T.S. and Mumford, D. Hierarchical Bayesianinference in the visual cortex. Journal of the OpticalSociety of America 20, 7 (July 2003), 1434-1448.
15. Li, N. and DiCarlo, J.J. Unsupervised naturalexperience rapidly alters invariant objectrepresentation in visual cortex. Science 321, 5895(Sept. 12, 2008), 1502-1507.
16. Logothetis, N.K., Pauls, J., and Poggio, T. Shaperepresentation in the inferior temporal cortexof monkeys. Current Biology 5, 5 (May 1, 1995), 552-563.
17. Marko, H. and Giebel, H. Recognition of handwrittencharacters with a system of homogeneous layers.Nachrichtentechnische Zeitschrift 23 (1970), 455-459.
18. Masquelier, T., Serre, T., Thorpe, S., and Poggio, T.Learning Complex Cell Invariance from NaturalVideos: A Plausibility Proof. MIT Center for Biological& Computational Learning Paper #269/MIT-CSAI LTR#2007-060, Cambridge, MA, 2007.
19. Mutch, J. and Lowe, D. Multiclass object recognitionusing sparse, localized features. In Proceedings of theComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition (New York,June 17-22, 2006).
20. Pinto, N., Cox, D.D., and DiCarlo, J.J. Why is real-worldvisual object recognition hard? PLoS ComputationalBiology 4, 1 (Jan. 1, 2008), e27.
21. Polk, T.A., Park, J.E., Smith, M.R., and Park, D.C.Nature versus nurture in ventral visual cortex:A functional magnetic resonance imaging studyof twins. Journal of Neuroscience 27, 51 (2007), 13921-13925.
22. Rao, R.P. and Ballard, D.H. Predictive coding in thevisual cortex: A functional interpretation of someextra-classical receptive-field effects. NatureNeuroscience 2, 1 (1999), 79-87.
23. Reynolds, J.H., Chelazzi, L., and Desimone, R.Competitive mechanisms subserve attention inmacaque areas V2 and V4. Journal of Neuroscience19, 5 (Mar. 1, 1999), 1736-2753.
24. Riesenhuber, M. and Poggio, T. Hierarchical models ofobject recognition in cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2,11 (1999), 1019-1025.
25. Rolls, E.T. and Deco, G. Computational Neuroscienceof Vision. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K., 2002.
26. Serre, T., Kreiman, G., Kouh, M., Cadieu, C., Knoblich, U., and Poggio, T. A quantitative theory of immediatevisual recognition. Progress in Brain Research 165(2007), 33-56.
27. Serre, T., Wolf, L., Bileschi, S., Riesenhuber, M., and Poggio, T. Object recognition with cortex-likemechanisms. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysisand Machine Intelligence 29, 3 (2007), 411-426.
28. Serre, T., Oliva, A., and Poggio, T. A feedforwardarchitecture accounts for rapid categorization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104,15 (Apr. 10, 2007), 6424-6429.
29. Serre, T., Kouh, M., Cadieu, C., Knoblich, U., Kreiman, G., and Poggio, T. A Theory of Object Recognition:Computations and Circuits in the Feedforward Path ofthe Ventral Stream in Primate Visual Cortex. MIT AIMemo 2005-036 / CBC L Memo 259, AI Memo 2005-036 / CBC L Memo 259 2005. Cambridge, MA, 2005.
30. Thorpe, S., Fize, D., and Marlot, C. Speed of processingin the human visual system. Nature 381, 6582 (1996), 520-522.
31. Yuille, A. and Kersten, D. Vision as Bayesian inference:Analysis by synthesis? Trends in Cognitive Science 10,7 (July 2006), 301-308.