Representations of shape during mental rotation

AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn SS-10-02, Issue , 2010, Pages 15-20

  Khooshabeh, Peter ^a   Hegarty, Mary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLOR;

3-D SHAPE; COMPLEX OBJECTS; INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; MENTAL REPRESENTATIONS; MENTAL ROTATION; SHAPE PROCESSING; VERBAL PROTOCOL ANALYSIS; VISUAL INFORMATION;

ROTATION;

EID: 77957944061     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Carpenter, P., & Just, M. (1978). Eye fixations during mental rotation. In Eye movements and the higher psychological functions (pp. 115-133). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Hegarty, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of visual-spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 684-689.
3. Just, M., & Carpenter, P. (1985). Cognitive coordinate systems: Accounts of mental rotation and individual differences in spatial ability. Psychological Review, 92, 137-172.
4. Just, M., & Carpenter, P. (1976). Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 441-480.
5. Just, M., & Varma, S. (2007). The organization of thinking: What functional brain imaging reveals about the neuroarchitecture of complex cognition. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 153-191.
6. Khooshabeh, P. (2009). Is mental rotation color blind? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
7. Khooshabeh, P., & Hegarty, M. (2008). How visual information affects a spatial task. In Proceedings of Cognitive Science Society. Washington, DC: Cognitive Science Society.
8. Khooshabeh, P., & Hegarty, M. (2008b). Differential effects of color on mental rotation as a function of spatial ability. In International Spatial Cognition Conference. Freiburg, Germany.
9. Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Kosslyn, S. M., and Thompson., W. L., & Ganis, G. (2006). The case for mental imagery. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
11. Kozhevnikov, M. (2007). Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: Toward an integrated framework of cognitive style. Psychological Bulletin, 133(3), 464-481.
12. Kozhevnikov, M., Hegarty, M., & Mayer, R. (2002). Revising the visualizer/verbalizer dimension: Evidence for two types of visualizers. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 41-11.
13. Kozhevnikov, M., Kosslyn, S., & Shephard, J. (2005). Spatial versus object visualizers: a new characterization of visual cognitive style. Memory and Cognition, 55(4), 710-26.
14. Metzler, J., & Shepard, R. N. (1974). Transformational studies of the internal representation of three-dimensional objects. In Theories in cognitive psychology: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 147-201). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Pylyshyn, Z. (2002). Mental imagery: In search of a theory. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 25(2), 157-238.
17. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
18. Stull, A. T., Hegarty, M., & Mayer, R. (2009). Getting a handle on learning anatomy with interactive three-dimensional graphics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 803-816.