Coronary risk stratification, discrimination, and reclassification improvement based on quantification of Subclinical coronary atherosclerosis: The Heinz Nixdorf Recall study

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 56, Issue 17, 2010, Pages 1397-1406

  Erbel, Raimund ^a   Mhlenkamp, Stefan ^a   Moebus, Susanne ^b   Schmermund, Axel ^c   Lehmann, Nils ^b   Stang, Andreas ^d   Dragano, Nico ^e   Grnemeyer, Dietrich ^f   Seibel, Rainer ^g   Klsch, Hagen ^a   Brcker Preuss, Martina ^b   Mann, Klaus ^b   Siegrist, Johannes ^e   Jckel, Karl Heinz ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

^c Cardioangiological Center Bethanien   (Germany)

^d MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

^e Institute of Medical Sociology   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WITTEN HERDECKE   (Germany)

^g Diagnosticum ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

cardiac death; coronary artery calcification; myocardial infarction; reclassification; risk factors; subclinical atherosclerosis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CORONARY RISK; ELECTRON BEAM TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; CALCINOSIS; CLASSIFICATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK FACTOR;

AGED; CALCINOSIS; COHORT STUDIES; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77957909658     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.030     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. P.W. Wilson, R.B. D'Agostino, D. Levy, A.M. Belanger, H. Silbershatz, and W.B. Kannel Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories Circulation 97 1998 1837 1847
2. G. Assmann, P. Cullen, and H. Schulte Simple scoring scheme for calculating the risk of acute coronary events based on the 10-year follow-up of the prospective cardiovascular Mnster (PROCAM) study Circulation 105 2002 310 315
3. A.D. Sniderman, and C.D. Furberg Age as a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease Lancet 371 2008 1547 1549
4. L. Shaw, P. Raggi, D.S. Berman, and Q. Callister CAC as a measure of biologic age Atherosclerosis 188 2006 112 119
5. P. Greenland, R.O. Bonow, and B.H. Brundage ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on CAC scoring by CT in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain: a report of the ACC Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography) J Am Coll Cardiol 49 2007 378 402
6. R.F. Redberg Coronary artery calcium: should we rely on this surrogate marker? Circulation 113 2006 336 337
7. A. Schmermund, S. Mhlenkamp, and A. Stang Assessment of clinically silent atherosclerotic disease and established and novel risk factors for predicting myocardial infarction and cardiac death in healthy middle-aged subjects: rationale and design of the Heinz Nixdorf RECALL Study Risk Factors, Evaluation of Coronary Calcium and Lifestyle Am Heart J 144 2002 212 218
8. R. Detrano, A.D. Guerci, and J.J. Carr Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups N Engl J Med 358 2008 1336 1345
9. M.J. Budoff, K. Nasir, and R.L. McClelland Coronary calcium predicts events better with absolute calcium scores than age-, sex-, race/ethnicity percentiles: MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Etherosclerosis) J Am Coll Cardiol 53 2009 345 352
10. B. Zethelius, L. Berglund, and J. Sundstrm Use of multiple biomarkers to improve the prediction of death from cardiovascular causes N Engl J Med 358 2008 2107 2116
11. O. Melander, C. Newton-Cheh, and P. Almgren Novel and conventional biomarkers for prediction of incident cardiovascular events in the community JAMA 302 2009 49 57
12. A. Stang, S. Moebus, N. Dragano Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study Investigation Group Baseline recruitment and analyses of nonresponse of the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study: identifiability of phone numbers as the major determinant of response Eur J Epidemiol 20 2005 489 496
13. R. Erbel, S. Mhlenkamp, N. Lehmann Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study Investigative Group Sex related cardiovascular risk stratification based on quantification of atherosclerosis and inflammation Atherosclerosis 197 2008 662 672
14. Third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) Final Report Circulation 106 2002 3143 3421
15. T.S. Polonsky, R.L. McClelland, and N.W. Jorgensen Coronary artery calcium score and risk classification for coronary heart disease prediction JAMA 303 2010 1610 1616
16. K. Thygesen, J.S. Alpert, H.D. White Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction Universal definition of myocardial infarction J Am Coll Cardiol 50 2007 2173 2195
17. M.J. Pencina, R.B. D'Agostino, R.B. D'Agostino Jr., and R.S. Vasan Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond Stat Med 27 2008 157 172
18. E.R. DeLong, D.M. DeLong, and D.L. Clarke-Pearson Comparing the areas under two or more correlated ROC-curves: a non-parametric approach Biometrics 443 1988 837 845
19. D. Spiegelman, and E. Hertzmark Easy SAS calculations for risk or prevalence ratios and differences Am J Epidemiol 162 2005 199 200
20. T. Shah, J.P. Casas, and J.A. Cooper Critical appraisal of CRP measurement for the prediction of coronary heart disease events: new data and systematic review of 31 prospective cohorts Int J Epidemiol 38 2009 217 231
21. R.K. Simmons, S. Sharp, and S.M. Boekholdt Evaluation of the Framingham risk score in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer-Norfolk cohort: does adding glycated hemoglobin improve the prediction of coronary heart disease events? Arch Intern Med 168 2008 1209 1216
22. M.T. Cooney, A.L. Dudina, and I.M. Graham Value and limitations of existing scores for the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a review for clinicians J Am Coll Cardiol 54 2009 1209 1227
23. M.T. Cooney, A. Dudina, and D. DeBacquer How much does HDL cholesterol add to risk estimation? A report from the SCORE Investigators Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 16 2009 304 314
24. M.T. Cooney, E. Vartiainen, T. Laatikainen, A. Joulevi, A. Dudina, and I. Graham Simplifying cardiovascular risk estimation using resting heart rate Eur Heart J 31 2010 2141 2147
25. N.R. Cook, J.E. Buring, and P.M. Ridker The effect of including CRP in cardiovascular risk prediction models for women Ann Intern Med 145 2006 21 29
26. P.W. Wilson, M. Pencina, P. Jacques, J. Selhub, R. D'Agostino Sr., and C.J. O'Donnell C-reactive protein and reclassification of cardiovascular risk in the Framingham Heart Study Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 1 2008 92 97
27. P.M. Ridker, N.P. Paynter, N. Rifai, J.M. Gaziano, and N.R. Cook C-reactive protein and parental history improve global cardiovascular risk prediction: The Reynolds Risk Score for men Circulation 118 2008 2243 2251
28. Y. Arad, K.J. Goodman, M. Roth, D. Newstein, and A.D. Guerci Coronary calcification, coronary disease risk factors, C-reactive protein, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events: the St. Francis Heart Study J Am Coll Cardiol 46 2005 158 165
29. R. Smith-Bindman, J. Lipson, and R. Marcus Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer Arch Intern Med 169 2009 2078 2086
30. J.D. Berry, K. Liu, and A.R. Folsom Prevalence and progression of subclinical atherosclerosis in younger adults with low short-term but high lifetime estimated risk for CVD: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study and Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis Circulation 119 2009 382 389
31. A. Sarwar, L.J. Shaw, and M.D. Shapiro Diagnostic and prognostic value of absence of coronary artery calcification J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2 2009 675 688
32. P. Raggi, L.J. Shaw, D.S. Berman, and T.Q. Callister Prognostic value of coronary artery calcium screening in subjects with and without diabetes J Am Coll Cardiol 43 2004 1663 1669
33. D.B. Mark, L. Shaw, and F.E. Harrell Jr. Prognostic value of a treadmill exercise score in outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease N Engl J Med 325 1991 849 853
34. P. Greenland, L. LaBree, S.P. Azen, T.M. Doherty, and R.C. Detrano CAC score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals JAMA 291 2004 210 215
35. H.W. Hense, H. Schulte, H. Lwel, G. Assmann, and U. Keil Framingham risk function overestimates risk of coronary heart disease in men and women from Germany: results from the MONICA Augsburg and the PROCAM cohorts Eur Heart J 24 2003 937 945
36. S.R. Preis, S.J. Hwang, and C.S. Fox Eligibility of individuals with subclinical CAC and intermediate coronary heart disease risk for reclassification (from the Framingham Heart Study) Am J Cardiol 103 2009 1710 1715
37. M. Nicholls Preventive cardiology in Germany: HeartScore Circulation 114 2006 f138 f139
38. J. Hippisley-Cox, C. Coupland, Y. Vnogradova, J. Robson, M. May, and P. Brindle Derivation and validation of QRISK, a new cardiovascular disease risk score for the United Kingdom: prospective open cohort study BMJ 335 2007 136
39. M.A. Hlatky, P. Greenland, D.K. Arnett American Heart Association Expert Panel on Subclinical Atherosclerotic Diseases and Emerging Risk Factors and the Stroke Council Criteria for Evaluation of Novel Markers of Cardiovascular Risk A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Circulation 119 2009 2408 2416