Life cycles of research groups: The case of CWTS

Research Evaluation

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 173-184

  Braam, Robert ^a,b   van den Besselaar, Peter ^a,c  

^a Independent researcher Liemers 12   (Netherlands)

^b Rathenau Institute KNAW   (Netherlands)

^c VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957894578     PISSN: 09582029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/095820210X503465     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Arrow, Holly, Kelly Bouas Henry, Marshall Scott Poole, Susan Wheelan and Richard Moreland 2005. Traces, trajectories, and timing: the temporal perspective on groups. In Theories of Small Groups: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, eds M S Poole and A B Hollingshead, pp. 313-367. Thousand Oaks CA, USA: Sage Publications.
2. Braam, Robert R 1991. Mapping of science: foci of intellectual interest in scientific literature. Thesis. Leiden, The Netherlands: DSWO Press.
3. Braam, Robert 2009. Everything about genes: some results on the dynamics of genomics research. Scientometrics, 79(1), 6-77.
4. Braam, R R and P van den Besselaar 2008. Positioning and dynamics of research groups as reflected in their bibliometric life history. Paper presented at the 2nd ENID-PRIME Conference on STI-Indicators for Policy, 28-30 May 2008, Oslo University College, Norway.
5. Braam, Robert and Peter van den Besselaar 2010. Indicators for the dynamics of research groups. Paper presented at the 3rd ENID Conference on STI Indicators for Policymaking and Strategic Decision, 3-5 March 2010, CNAM, Paris, France.'.
6. CWTS, Centre for Science and Technology Studies 2009. Annual Reports 1986 to 2008. Leiden, The Netherlands: CWTS, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University.
7. De Solla Price, Derek 1963. Little Science Big Science (paper-back edn 1965). New York and London: Columbia University Press.
8. Gläser, Jochen, Thomas Spurling and Linda Butler 2004. Intraorganisational evaluation: are there 'least evaluable units'? Research Evaluation, 13(1), April, 19-32.
9. Hannan, Michael T, László Pólos and Glenn R Carroll 2007. Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes, and Ecologies. Princeton, New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press.
10. Jones, W P and G W Furnas 1987. Pictures of relevance: a geometric analysis of similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(6), 420-442.
11. Larédo, Philippe and Philippe Mustar 2000. Laboratory activity profiles: an exploratory approach. Scientometrics, 47(3), 515-539.
12. Leiden University 2008. Research Assessment Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Review Period 2002-2007. Leiden University.
13. Moed, H F 1989. The use of bibliometric indicators for the assessment of research performance in the natural and life sciences: aspects of data collection, reliability, validity and applicability. Thesis. Leiden, The Netherlands: DSWO Press.
14. Moed, H F 2005. Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Text-book. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
15. Moed, H F, W J M Burger, J G Frankfort and A F J van Raan 1983. On the Measurement of Research Performance: the Use of Bibliometric Indicators. Leiden, The Netherlands: Leiden University Press.
16. Moed, H F, W J M Burger, J G Frankfort and A F J van Raan 1985. The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance, Research Policy, 14, 131-149.
17. Nederhof, A J 1985. Evaluating research output through life work citation counts. Scientometrics, 7(1-2), 23-28.
18. Poole, Marshall Scott, Andrew H van de Ven, Kevin Dooley and Michael Holmes 2000. Organizational Change and Innovation Processes: Theory and Methods for Research. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
19. Poole, Marshall Scott and Andrea B Hollingshead eds 2005. Theories of Small Groups: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Thousand Oaks CA, USA: Sage Publications.
20. Salton, G and M J McGill 1983. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.
21. Sanz-Menéndez, Luis and Laura Cruz-Castro 2003. Coping with environmental pressures: public research organisations responses to funding crises. Research Policy, 32, 1293-1308.
22. Tijssen, Robert J W 1992. Cartography of science: scientometric mapping with multidimensional scaling methods. Thesis. Leiden, The Netherlands: DSWO Press.
23. Taylor, Wayne 2008. Change-Point Analyzer Software. USA: Taylor Enterprises, Inc. .
24. Van den Besselaar, Peter 2000. Communication between science and technology studies journals: a case study in differentiation and integration in scientific fields. Scientometrics, 47(2), 169-193.
25. Van den Besselaar, Peter 2001. The cognitive and the social structure of science and technology studies. Scientometrics, 51(2), 441-460.
26. Van Raan, A F J ed. 1988. Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology. Amsterdam. The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers.
27. Van Raan, A F J 2000. R&D evaluation at the beginning of the new century. Research Evaluation, 8(2), August, 81-86.
28. Van Raan, A F J 2004. Measuring science. In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, eds H F Moed, W Glänzel and U Smoch, pp. 19-50. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
29. Van Raan, A F J and J G Frankfort 1980. An approach to university policy: a new research funding system. International Journal of Institution Management in Higher Education, 4, 155.
30. Website of CWTS, University of Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands: .