Conditioned place preference in rodents and humans

Neuromethods

Volumn 50, Issue , 2011, Pages 133-152

  Mueller, Devin ^a   De Wit, Harriet ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

addiction; Conditioned place preference; drug abuse; extinction; human; place conditioning; reinstatement; relapse; rodent

Indexed keywords

AMPHETAMINE; BETA ENDORPHIN; COCAINE; DIAMORPHINE; MORPHINE; PLACEBO;

CONDITIONING; DATA ANALYSIS; DRUG USE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PLACE PREFERENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REINFORCEMENT; REVIEW; REWARD; RODENT;

ANIMALIA; RODENTIA;

EID: 77957891971     PISSN: 08932336     EISSN: 19406045     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60761-883-6_6     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. Garcia J, Kimeldorf DJ, Hunt EL (1957) Spatial avoidance in the rat as a result of exposure to ionizing radiation. Br J Radiol 30:318-321
2. Beach HD (1957) Morphine addiction in rats. Can J Psychol 11:104-112
3. Schechter MD, Calcagnetti DJ (1998) Con-tinued trends in the conditioned place prefer-ence literature from 1992 to 1996, inclusive, with a cross-indexed bibliography. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 22:827-846
4. Tzschentke TM (2007) Measuring reward with the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm: update of the last decade. Addict Biol 12:227-462
5. Carlezon WA Jr (2003) Place conditioning to study drug reward and aversion. Methods Mol Med 84:243-249
6. Heinrichs SC, Martinez JL Jr (1986) Modification of place preference condi-tioning in mice by systemically adminis-tered [Leu]enkephalin. Behav Brain Res 22: 249-255
7. Schnur P, Morrell J (1990) Morphine condi-tioned place preference in the hamster. Phar-macol Biochem Behav 37:383-385
8. Pomerantz AS, Wertz J, Hepner B, Walso L, Piazza J (1992) Cocaine-induced condi-tioned place preferences in rhesus monkeys. Soc Neurosci Abstr 18:1572
9. Hughes RA, Baker MR, Rettig KM (1995) Cocaine-conditioned place preference in young precocial domestic fowl. Exp Clin Psy-chopharmacol 3:105-111
10. Ninkovic J, Bally-Cuif L (2006) The zebrafish as a model system for assessing the reinforcing properties ofdrugs ofabuse. Methods 39:262-274
11. Childs E, de Wit H (2009) Amphetamine-induced place preference in humans. Biol Psychiatry 65:900-904
12. Nomikos GG, Spyraki C (1988) Cocaine-induced place conditioning: importance of route of administration and other proce-dural variables. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 94:119-125
13. Bardo MT, Rowlett JK, Harris MJ (1995) Conditioned place preference using opiate and stimulant drugs: a meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 19:39-51
14. Bardo MT, Neisewander JL (1986) Single-trial conditioned place preference using intravenous morphine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav25:1101-1105
15. Bozarth MA, Wise RA (1982) Dissociation of the rewarding and physical dependence-producing properties ofmorphine. In: Har-ris LS (ed) Problems of drug dependence. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD, pp 171-177
16. Amalric M, Cline EJ, Martinez JL Jr, Bloom FE, Koob GF (1987) Rewarding proper-ties of beta-endorphin as measured by con-ditioned place preference. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 91:14-19
17. Mucha RF, Iversen SD (1984) Reinforc-ing properties of morphine and naloxone revealed by conditioned place preferences: a procedural examination. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 82:241-247
18. Reid LD, Hunter GA, Beaman CM, Hubbell CL (1985) Toward understanding ethanol's capacity to be reinforcing: a conditioned place preference following injections of ethanol. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 22: 483-487
19. Parker LA, Tomlinson T, Horn D, Erb SM (1994) Relative strength of place condi-tioning produced by cocaine and morphine assessed in a three-choice paradigm. Learn Motiv25:83-94
20. Carr GD, Fibiger HC, Phillips AG (1989) Conditioned place preference as a mea-sure of drug reward. In: Liebman JM, Cooper SJ (eds) The neuropharmacological basis of reward. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 264-319
21. Schechter MD (1995) Cocaethylene pro-duces conditioned place preference in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 51: 549-552
22. Schenk S, Ellison F, Hunt T, Amit Z (1985) An examination of heroin conditioning in preferred and nonpreferred environments and in differentially housed mature and immature rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 22:215-220
23. Cervo L, Rossi C, Samanin R (1993) Clonidine-induced place preference is medi-ated by alpha 2-adrenoceptors outside the locus coeruleus. Eur J Pharmacol 238: 201-207
24. Costello NL, Carlson JN, Glick SD, Bryda M (1989) Dose-dependent and baseline-dependent conditioning with d-amphetamine in the place condition-ing paradigm. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 99:244-247
25. Li T, Yan CX, Hou Y, Cao W, Chen T, Zhu BF, Li SB (2008) Cue-elicited drug crav-ing represses ERK activation in mice pre-frontal association cortex. Neurosci Lett 448: 99-104
26. Miller CA, Marshall JF (2004) Altered pre-limbic cortex output during cue-elicited drug seeking. J Neurosci 24:6889-6897
27. Mueller D, Stewart J (2000) Cocaine-induced conditioned place preference: rein-statement by priming injections of cocaine after extinction. Behav Brain Res 115:39-47
28. Li SM, Ren YH, Zheng JW (2002) Effect of 7-nitroindazole on drug-priming reinstate-ment of D-methamphetamine-induced con-ditioned place preference. Eur J Pharmacol 443:205-206
29. Shoblock JR, Wichmann J, Maidment NT (2005) The effect of a systemically active ORL-1 agonist, Ro 64-6198, on the acqui-sition, expression, extinction, and reinstate-ment ofmorphine conditioned place prefer-ence. Neuropharmacology49:439-446
30. Botreau F, Paolone G, Stewart J (2006) D-Cycloserine facilitates extinction of a cocaine-induced conditioned place prefer-ence. Behav Brain Res 172:173-178
31. Paolone G, Botreau F, Stewart J (2009) The facilitative effects ofD-cycloserine on extinc-tion of a cocaine-induced conditioned place preference can be long lasting and resis-tant to reinstatement. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 202:403-409
32. Malvaez M, Sanchis-Segura C, Vo D, Lat-tal KM, Wood MA (2010) Modulation of chromatin modification facilitates extinction ofcocaine-induced conditioned place prefer-ence. Biol Psychiatry 67:36-43
33. Mueller D, Perdikaris D, Stewart J (2002) Persistence and drug-induced reinstatement of a morphine-induced conditioned place preference. Behav Brain Res 136:389-397
34. Font L, Miquel M, Aragon CM (2008) Involvement of brain catalase activity in the acquisition of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference. Physiol Behav 93:733-741
35. Leao RM, Cruz FC, Planeta CS (2009) Exposure to acute restraint stress reinstates nicotine-induced place preference in rats. Behav Pharmacol 20:109-113
36. Sanchez CJ, Sorg BA (2001) Conditioned fear stimuli reinstate cocaine-induced con-ditioned place preference. Brain Res 908: 86-92
37. Parker LA, McDonald RV (2000) Reinstate-ment of both a conditioned place prefer-ence and a conditioned place aversion with drug primes. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 66: 559-561
38. Lu L, Chen H, Su W, Ge X, Yue W, Su F, Ma L (2005) Role of withdrawal in reinstatement ofmorphine-conditioned place preference. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 181: 90-100
39. Ribeiro Do Couto B, Aguilar MA, Man-zanedo C, Rodriguez-Arias M, Minarro J (2003) Reinstatement ofmorphine-induced conditioned place preference in mice by priminginjections. Neural Plast 10:279-290
40. Leri F, Rizos Z (2005) Reconditioning of drug-related cues: a potential contributor to relapse after drug reexposure. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 80:621-630
41. Zavala AR, Weber SM, Rice HJ, Alleweireldt AT, Neisewander JL (2003) Role of the pre-limbic subregion of the medial prefrontal cortex in acquisition, extinction, and rein-statement ofcocaine-conditioned place pref-erence. Brain Res 990:157-164
42. Itzhak Y, Martin JL (2002) Cocaine-induced conditioned place preference in mice: induction, extinction and reinstate-ment byrelated psychostimulants. Neuropsy-chopharmacology 26:130-134
43. Szumlinski KK, Price KL, Frys KA, Mid-daugh LD (2002) Unconditioned and con-ditioned factors contribute to the 'reinstate-ment' of cocaine place conditioning follow-ing extinction in C57BL/6 mice. Behav Brain Res 136:151-160
44. Maldonado C, Rodriguez-Arias M, Castillo A, Aguilar MA, Minarro J (2007) Effect of memantine and CNQX in the acqui-sition, expression and reinstatement of cocaine-induced conditioned place prefer-ence. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psy-chiatry 31:932-939
45. Cruz FC, Marin MT, Planeta CS (2008) The reinstatement of amphetamine-induced place preference is long-lasting and related to decreased expression of AMPA recep-tors in the nucleus accumbens. Neuroscience 151:313-319
46. Biala G, Budzynska B (2006) Reinstatement of nicotine-conditioned place preference by drug priming: effects of calcium channel antagonists. Eur J Pharmacol 537:85-93
47. Kuzmin A, Sandin J, Terenius L, Ogren SO (2003) Acquisition, expression, and rein-statement of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in mice: effects of opioid receptor-like 1 receptor agonists and nalox-one. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 304:310-318
48. Daza-Losada M, Rodriguez-Arias M, Aguilar MA, Minarro J (2009) Acquisition and rein-statement of MDMA-induced conditioned place preference in mice pre-treated with MDMA or cocaine during adolescence. Addict Biol 14:447-456
49. Do Ribeiro Couto B, Aguilar MA, Rodriguez-Arias M, Minarro J (2005) Cross-reinstatement by cocaine and amphetamine of morphine-induced place preference in mice. Behav Pharmacol 16:253-259
50. Wang B, Luo F, Zhang WT, Han JS (2000) Stress or drug priming induces reinstatement ofextinguished conditioned place preference. Neuroreport 11:2781-2784
51. Romieu P, Meunier J, Garcia D, Zozime N, Martin-Fardon R, Bowen WD, Mau-rice T (2004) The sigma1 (sigma1) recep-tor activation is a key step for the reactiva-tion ofcocaine conditioned place preference bydrugpriming. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 175:154-162
52. Biala G, Budzynska B (2008) Calcium-dependent mechanisms of the reinstatement of nicotine-conditioned place preference by drug priming in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 89:116-125
53. Katz JL, Higgins ST (2003) The validity of the reinstatement model of craving and relapse to drug use. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 168:21-30
54. Epstein DH, Preston KL, Stewart J, Shaham Y (2006) Toward a model of drug relapse: an assessment of the validity of the reinstate-ment procedure. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 189:1-16
55. Sinha R (2001) How does stress increase risk ofdrug abuse and relapse? Psychopharmacology (Berl) 158:343-359
56. Stewart J (2000) Pathways to relapse: the neurobiology of drug-and stress-induced relapse to drug-taking. J Psychiatry Neurosci 25:125-136
57. Shaham Y, Erb S, Stewart J (2000) Stress-induced relapse to heroin and cocaine seek-ing in rats: a review. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 33:13-33
58. Wang J, Fang Q, Liu Z, Lu L (2006) Region-specific effects of brain corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 1 blockade on footshock-stress-or drug-priming-induced reinstatement ofmorphine conditioned place preference in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 185:19-28
59. Ribeiro Do Couto B, Aguilar MA, Man-zanedo C, Rodriguez-Arias M, Armario A, Minarro J (2006) Social stress is as effec-tive as physical stress in reinstating morphine-induced place preference in mice. Psy-chopharmacology (Berl) 185:459-470
60. Ma YY, Chu NN, Guo CY, Han JS, Cui CL (2007) NR2B-containing NMDA recep-tor is required for morphine-but not stress-induced reinstatement. Exp Neurol 203:309-319
61. Lu L, Zhang B, Liu Z, Zhang Z (2002) Reactivation of cocaine conditioned place preference induced by stress is reversed by cholecystokinin-B receptors antagonist in rats. Brain Res 954:132-140
62. Sanchez CJ, Bailie TM, Wu WR, Li N, Sorg BA (2003) Manipulation of dopamine å1-like receptor activation in the rat medial prefrontal cortex alters stress-and cocaine-induced reinstatement of conditioned place preference behavior. Neuroscience 119: 497-505
63. Kreibich AS, Blendy JA (2004) cAMP response element-binding protein is required for stress but not cocaine-induced reinstate-ment. J Neurosci 24:6686-6692
64. Vezina P, Stewart J (1987) Conditioned locomotion and place preference elicited by tactile cues paired exclusively with morphine in an open field. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 91:375-380
65. Bardo MT, Bevins RA (2000) Conditioned place preference: what does it add to our pre-clinical understanding of drug reward? Psy-chopharmacology (Berl) 153:31-43
66. Mark GP, Hajnal A, Kinney AE, Keys AS (1999) Self-administration of cocaine increases the release of acetylcholine to a greater extent than response-independent cocaine in the nucleus accumbens of rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 143: 47-53
67. Hemby SE, Co C, Koves TR, Smith JE, Dworkin SI (1997) Differences in extracel-lular dopamine concentrations in the nucleus accumbens during response-dependent and response-independent cocaine administra-tion in the rat. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 133:7-16
68. Costa VC, Xavier GF (2007) Atropine-induced, state-dependent learning for spatial information, but not for visual cues. Behav Brain Res 179:229-238
69. Shulz DE, Sosnik R, Ego V, Haidarliu S, Ahissar E (2000) A neuronal analogue of state-dependent learning. Nature 403: 549-553
70. Izquierdo I, Dias RD (1983) Memory as a state dependent phenomenon: role of ACTH and epinephrine. Behav Neural Biol 38: 144-149
71. Gauvin DV, Briscoe RJ, Goulden KL, Hol-loway FA (1994) Aversive attributes of ethanol can be attenuated by dyadic social interaction in the rat. Alcohol 11:247-251
72. Thiel KJ, Okun AC, Neisewander JL (2008) Social reward-conditioned place preference: a model revealing an interaction between cocaine and social context rewards in rats. Drug Alcohol Depend 96:202-212
73. Piazza PV, Deroche-Gamonent V, Rouge-Pont F, Le Moal M (2000) Vertical shifts in self-administration dose-response func-tions predict a drug-vulnerable phenotype predisposed to addiction. J Neurosci 20: 4226-4232
74. Piazza PV, Deminiere JM, Le Moal M, Simon H (1989) Factors that predict indi-vidual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science 245:1511-1513
75. Orsini C, Buchini F, Piazza PV, Puglisi-Allegra S, Cabib S (2004) Susceptibility to amphetamine-induced place preference is predicted by locomotor response to novelty and amphetamine in the mouse. Psychophar-macology (Berl) 172:264-270
76. Gong W, Neill DB, Justice JB Jr (1996) Locomotor response to novelty does not pre-dict cocaine place preference conditioning in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 53:191-196
77. Erb SM, Parker LA (1994) Individual differ-ences in novelty-induced activity do not pre-dict strength of amphetamine-induced place conditioning. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 48:581-586
78. Allen RM, Everett CV, Nelson AM, Gul-ley JM, Zahniser NR (2007) Low and high locomotor responsiveness to cocaine predicts intravenous cocaine conditioned place prefer-ence inmale Sprague-Dawley rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 86:37-44
79. Shimosato K, Watanabe S (2003) Concur-rent evaluation of locomotor response to novelty and propensity toward cocaine con-ditioned place preference in mice. J Neurosci Methods 128:103-110
80. Pelloux Y, Costentin J, Duterte-Boucher D (2009) Anxietyincreases the place condition-ing induced by cocaine in rats. Behav Brain Res 197:311-316