Interactions between spider silk and cells - NIH/3T3 fibroblasts seeded on miniature weaving frames

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 8, 2010, Pages

  Kuhbier, Joern W ^a   Allmeling, Christina ^a   Reimers, Kerstin ^a   Hillmer, Anja ^a   Kasper, Cornelia ^b   Menger, Bjoern ^a   Brandes, Gudrun ^a   Guggenheim, Merlin ^c   Vogt, Peter M ^a  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^b LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; COLLAGEN; FIBRONECTIN; STEEL; TRYPSIN; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ARTICLE; BIOTECHNOLOGICAL PRODUCTION; CELL ADHESION; CELL COUNT; CELL GROWTH; CELL INTERACTION; CELL KINETICS; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRAIN 3T3; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS; INSTRUMENT STERILIZATION; MECHANICS; NONHUMAN; SILK; SPIDER; TISSUE ENGINEERING; ANIMAL; CELL MOTION; CELL SURVIVAL; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECT; FIBROBLAST; METABOLISM; MOUSE;

ANIMALIA; ARANEAE; BOMBYX MORI;

ANIMALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL MOVEMENT; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FIBROBLASTS; MICE; NIH 3T3 CELLS; SILK; SPIDERS; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 77957887469     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012032     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Brown RA, Phillips JB (2007) Cell responses to biomimetic protein scaffolds used in tissue repair and engineering. Int Rev Cytol 262: 75-150.
2. Evans GRD, Brandt K, Widmer MS, Lu L, Meszlenyi RK, et al. (1999) In vivo evaluation of poly(L-lactic acid) porous conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration. Biomaterials 20(11): 1109-1115.
3. Widmer MS, Gupta PK, Lu L, Meszlenyi RK, Evans GRD, et al. (1998) Manufacture of porous biodegradable polymer conduits by an extrusion process for guided tissue regeneration. Biomaterials 19(21): 1945-1955.
4. Riesle J, Hollander AP, Langer R, Freed LE, Vunjak-Novakovic G (1998) Collagen in tissue-engineered cartilage: types, structure, and crosslinks. J Cell Biochem 71: 313-327.
5. van Luyn MJ, van Wachem PB, Damink LO, Dijkstra PJ, Feijen J, et al. (1992) Relations between in vitro cytotoxicity and crosslinked dermal sheep collagens. J Biomed Mater Res 26: 1091-1110.
6. Minoura N, Aiba S, Higuchi M, Gotoh Y, Tsukada M, et al. (1995) Attachment and growth of fibroblast cells on silk fibroin. Biochem Biophysl Res Comm 208(2): 511-516.
7. Altmann GH, Diaz F, Jakuba C, Calabro T, Horan RL, et al. (2003) Silk-based biomaterials. Biomaterials 24: 401-416.
8. Yang Y, Chen X, Ding F, Zhang P, Liu J, et al. (2007) Biocompatibility evaluation of silk fibroin with peripheral nerve tissues and cells in vitro. Biomaterials 28: 1643-1652.
9. MacIntosh AC, Kearns VR, Crawford A, Hatton PV (2008) Skeletal tissue engineering using silk biomaterials. J Tissue Eng Regenerat Med 2: 71-80.
10. Rising A, Nimmervoll H, Grip S, Fernandez-Arias A, Storckenfeldt E, et al. (2005) Spider silk proteins-mechanical property and gene sequence. Zool Sci 22(3): 273-281.
11. Vollrath F (2000) Strength and structure of spiders' silks. J Biotechnol 74(2): 67-83.
12. Wong P, Foo C, Kaplan DL (2002) Genetic engineering of fibrous proteins: spider dragline silk and collagen. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 54(8): 1131-1143.
13. Cunniff PM, Fossey SA, Auerbach MA, Song JW, Kaplan DL, et al. (1995) Mechanical and thermal properties of dragline silk from the spider Nephila clavipes. Polym Adv Technol 5: 401-410.
14. Work R (1976) The force elongation behaviour of web fibers and silks forcibly obtained from orb-web-spinning spiders. Textile Res J 46: 485-492.
15. Bell FI, McEwen IJ, Viney C (2002) Fibre science: Supercontraction stress in wet spider dragline. Nature 416: 37.
16. Sponner A, Vater W, Monajembashi S, Unger E, Grosse F, et al. (2007) Compostion and Hierarchical Organisation of a spider silk. PLOS one 10(e998): 1-8.
17. Vollrath F, Knight DP (2001) Liquid crystalline spinning of spider silk. Nature 410(6228): 541-548.
18. Vendrely C, Scheibel T (2007) Biotechnological production of spider-silk protein enables new application. Macromol Biosc 7: 401-409.
19. Brini E, Foo CW, Huang J, Karageorgiou V, Kitchel B, et al. (2006) RGDFunctionalized Bioengineered Spider Dragline Silk. Biomaterial Biomacromol 7(11): 3139-3145.
20. Gellnyck K, Verdonk PMC, Van Nimmen E, Almqvist KF, Gheysens T, et al. (2008) Silkworm and spider silk scaffolds for chondrocyte support. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 19: 3399-3409.
21. Allmeling C, Jokuszies A, Reimers K, Kall S, Vogt PM (2006) Use of spider silk fibres as an innovative material in a biocompatible artificial nerve conduit. J Cell Mol Med 10(3): 770-777.
22. Allmeling C, Jokuszies A, Reimers K, Kall S, Choi CY, et al. (2008) Spider silk fibres in artificial nerve constructs promote peripheral nerve regeneration. Cell Prolif 41(3): 408-420.
23. Vollrath F, Barth P, Basedow A, Engstrom W, List H (2002) Local tolerance to spider silks and protein polymers in vivo. In Vivo Dev 16: 229-234.
24. Gellnyck K, Verdonk P, Forsynth R, Almqvist KF, Van Nimmen E, et al. (2008) Biocompatibility and biodegradability of spider egg sac silk. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 19: 2963-2970.
25. Scheller J, Henggeler D, Viviani A, Conrad U (2004) Purification of spider silkelastin from transgenic plants and application for human chondrocyte proliferation. Transgen Res 13: 51-57.
26. Hakimi O, Gheysens T, Vollrath F, Grahn MF, Knight DP, et al. (2010) Modulation of cell growth on exposure to silkworm and spider silk fibers. J Biomed Mater Res A 92(4): 1366-1372.
27. Hakimi O, Knight DP, Vollrath F, Vadgama P (2007) Spider and mulberry silkworm silks as compatible biomaterials. Composites Part B 38(3): 324-337.
28. Gumbiner BM (1996) Cell adhesion: the molecular basis of tissue architecture and morphogenesis. Cell 84: 345-357.
29. Lauffenburger DA, Horwitz AF (1996) Cell migration: a physically integrated molecular process. Cell 84: 359-369.
30. Liu CH, Hu YY, Wang XL, Liu P, Xu LM (2000) Effects of salvianolic acid-A on NIH3T3 fibroblast proliferation, collagen synthesis and gene expression. World J Gastroenterol 6(3): 361-364.
31. Michal CA, Simmons A, Chew BGM, Zax DB, Jelinski LW (1995) Presence of phosphorus in Nephila clavipes dragline silk. Biophys J 70: 489-493.
32. Jackson C, O'Brien J (1995) Molecular weight distribution of Nephila clavipes dragline silk. Macromolecules 28: 5975-5977.
33. Pierschbacher MD, Ruoslahti E (1987) New perspectives in cell adhesion: RGD and integrins. Science 238: 491-497.
34. Ruoslahti E (1996) RGD and other recognition sequences for integrins. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 12: 697-715.
35. Michishita M, Videm V, Arnaout MA (1993) A novel divalent cation-binding site in the A domain of the b2 integrin CR3 (CD11b/CD18) is essential for ligand binding. Cell 72: 857-867.
36. Maheshwari G, Brown G, Lauffenburger DA, Wells A, Griffith LG (2000) Cell adhesion and motility depend on nanoscale RGD clustering. J Cell Sci 113: 1677-1686.
37. Pierschbacher MD, Ruoslahti E (1984) Cell attachment activity of fibronectin can be duplicated by small synthetic fragments of the molecule. Nature 309(5963): 30-33.
38. Nazarov R, Jin HJ, Kaplan DL (2004) Porous 3-D scaffolds from regenerated silk fibroin. Biomacromolecules 5: 718-726.
39. Kim UJ, Park J, Kim HJ, Wada M, Kaplan DL (2005) Three-dimensional aqueous-derived biomaterial scaffolds from silk fibroin. Biomaterials 26: 2775-2785.
40. Mandal BB, Kundu SC (2009) Cell proliferation and migration in silk fibroin 3D scaffolds. Biomaterials 30: 2956-2965.
41. Salthouse TN (1980) Biologic response to sutures. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 88(6): 658-664.
42. Wen CM, Ye ST, Zhou LX, Yu Y (1990) Silk-induced asthma in children: a report of 64 cases. Ann Allergy 65: 375-378.
43. Santin M, Motta A, Freddi G, Cannas M (1999) In vitro evaluation of the inflammatory potential of the silk fibroin. J Biomed Mater Res 46: 382-389.
44. Panilaitis B, Altman GH, Chen J, Jin HJ, Karageorgiou V, et al. (2003) Macrophage responses to silk. Biomaterials 24: 3079-3085.
45. Li MZ, Lu SZ, Wu ZY (2001) Study on porous silk fibroin materials 1: fine structure of freeze-dried silk fibroin. J Appl Polym Sci 79: 2185-2191.
46. Li MZ, Wu ZY, Zhang C, Lu SZ, Yan H, et al. (2001) Study on porous silk fibroin materials II: Preparation and characteristics of spongy porous silk fibroin materials. J Appl Polym Sci 79: 2192-2199.
47. Fahnestock SR, Yao Z, Bedzyk LA (2000) Microbial production of spider silk proteins. J Biotechnol 74(2): 105-119.
48. Huemmerich D, Scheibel T, Vollrath F, Cohen S, Gat U, et al. (2004) Novel assembly properties of recombinant spider dragline silk proteins. Curr Biol 14(22): 2070-2074.
49. Scheller J, Guhrs KH, Grosse F, Conrad U (2001) Production of spider silk proteins in tobacco and potato. Nat Biotechnol 19(6): 573-577.
50. Lazaris A, Arcidiacono S, Huang Y, Zhou JF, Duguay F, et al. (2002) Spider silk fibers spun from soluble recombinant silk produced in mammalian cells. Science 295(5554): 472-476.
51. Tan JL, Liu W, Nelson CM, Raghavan S, Chen CS (2004) Simple approach to Micropattern Cells on Common Culture Substrates by Tuning Substrate Wettability. Tissue E 10(5-6): 865-872.
52. Work RW, Emerson PD (1982) An apparatus for the forcible silking of spiders. J Arachnol 10: 1-10.
53. Riekel C, Rössle M, Sapede D, Vollrath F (2004) Influence of CO2 on the micro-structural properties of spider dragline silk: X-ray microdiffraction results. Naturwissenschaften 91: 30-33.
54. Gebert A, Preiss G (1998) A simple method for the acquisition of high-quality images from analogue scanning electron microscopes. J Microsc 191(3): 297-302.