Miss to the right: The effect of attentional asymmetries on goal-kicking

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 8, 2010, Pages

  Nicholls, Michael E R ^a   Loetscher, Tobias ^b   Rademacher, Maxwell ^b  

^a FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATHLETE; AUSTRALIA; BIOSENSOR; BRAIN ASYMMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FOOTBALL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEFT HEMISPHERE; LIGHT EMITTING DIODE; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SCORING SYSTEM; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; SPORTS ORGANIZATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPORT;

ATTENTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SOCCER;

EID: 77957879207     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012363     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Heilman KM, Watson RT, Valenstein E (1993) Neglect and related disorders. In: Heilman KM, Valenstein E, eds. New York: Oxford University Press. pp 279-336.
2. Tromp E, Dinkla A, Mulder T (1995) Walking through doorways: An analysis of navigation skills in patients with neglect. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 5: 319-331.
3. Webster JS, Rapport LJ, Godlewski MC, Abadee PS (1994) Effect of attentional bias to right space on wheelchair mobility. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 16: 129-137.
4. Webster JS, Roades LA, Morrill B, Rapport LJ, Abadee PS, et al. (1995) Rightward orienting bias, wheelchair maneuvering, and fall risk. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 76: 924-928.
5. Nichelli P, Rinaldi M, Cubelli R (1989) Selective spatial attention and length representation in normal subjects and in patients with unilateral spatial neglect. Brain and Cognition 9: 57-70.
6. McCourt ME (2001) Performance consistency of normal observers in forced-choice tachistoscopic visual line bisection. Neuropsychologia 39: 1065-1076.
7. Bowers D, Heilman KM (1980) Pseudoneglect - effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia 18: 491-498.
8. Bjoertomt O, Cowey A, Walsh V (2002) Spatial neglect in near and far space investigated by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain 125: 2012-2022.
9. Foxe JJ, McCourt ME, Javitt DC (2003) Right hemisphere control of visuospatial attention: line-bisection judgments evaluated with high-density electrical mapping and source analysis. Neuroimage 19: 710-726.
10. Waberski TD, Gobbelé R, Lamberty K, Buchner H, Marshall JC, et al. (2008) Timing of visuo-spatial information processing: Electrical source imaging related to line bisection judgements. Neuropsychologia 46: 1201-1210.
11. McCourt ME, Jewell G (1999) Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia 37: 843-855.
12. Loftus AM, Nicholls MER, Mattingley JB, Bradshaw JL (2008) Left to right: Representational biases for numbers and the effect of visuomotor adaptation. Cognition 107: 1048-1058.
13. Loftus AM, Vijayakumar N, Nicholls MER (2009) Prism adaptation overcomes pseudoneglect for the greyscales task. Cortex 45: 537-543.
14. Bultitude JH, Aimola Davies AM (2006) Putting attention on the line: investigating the activation-orientation hypothesis of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia 44: 1849-1858.
15. Corbetta M, Miezin FM, Shulman GL, Petersen SE (1993) A PET study of visuospatial attention. Journal of Neuroscience 13: 1202-1226.
16. Colby CL (1998) Action-oriented spatial reference frames in cortex. Neuron 20: 15-24.
17. Weiss PH, Marshall JC, Wunderlich G, Tellmann L, Halligan PW, et al. (2000) Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: A physiological basis for clinical dissociations. Brain 123: 2531-2541.
18. Longo MR, Lourenco SF (2006) On the nature of near space: Effects of tool use and the transition to far space. Neuropsychologia 44: 977-981.
19. Iriki A, Tanaka M, Iwamura Y (1996) Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. Neuroreport 7: 2325-2330.
20. Berti A, Frassinetti F (2000) When far becomes near: Remapping of space by tool use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12: 415-420.
21. Turnbull OH, McGeorge P (1998) Lateral bumping: A normal-subject analog to the behaviour of patients with hemispatial neglect? Brain and Cognition 37: 31-33.
22. Nicholls MER, Loftus A, Mayer K, Mattingley JB (2007) Things that go bump in the right: The effect of unimanual activity on rightward collisions. Neuropsychologia 45: 1122-1126.
23. Nicholls MER, Loftus AM, Orr CA, Barre N (2008) Rightward collisions and their association with pseudoneglect. Brain and Cognition 68: 166-170.
24. Nicholls MER, Hadgraft NT, Loftus AM, Robertson J, Bradshaw JL (in press) A hit and miss investigation of asymmetries in wheelchair navigation. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics.
25. Roberts R, Turnbull OH (2010) Putts that get missed on the right: Investigating lateralized attentional biases and the nature of putting errors in golf. Journal of Sports Sciences 28: 369-374.
26. Jewell G, McCourt ME (2000) Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia 38: 93-110.
27. Luh KE (1995) Line bisection and perceptual asymmetries in normal individuals: What you see is not what you get. Neuropsychology 9: 435-448.
28. Provins KA, Cunliffe P (1972) The reliability of some motor performance tests of handedness. Neuropsychologia 10: 199-206.
29. Coren S, Porac C, Duncan P (1979) A behaviorally validated self-report inventory to assess four types of lateral preference. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology 1: 55-64.
30. Gamberini L, Seraglia B, Priftis K (2008) Processing of peripersonal and extrapersonal space using tools: Evidence from visual line bisection in real and virtual environments. Neuropsychologia 46: 1298-1304.