Declarative and procedural working memory: Common principles, common capacity limits?

Psychologica Belgica

Volumn 50, Issue 3-4, 2010, Pages 277-308

  Oberauer, Klaus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957838447     PISSN: 00332879     EISSN: 2054670X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5334/pb-50-3-4-277     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Alvarez, G. A., & Cavanagh, P. (2004). The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychological Science, 15, 106-111.
2. Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, N. J.: Erlbaum.
3. Awh, E., Barton, B., & Vogel, E. K. (2007). Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity. Psychological Science, 18, 622-628.
4. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
5. Bertelson, P. (1965). Serial choice reaction-time as a function of response versus signal-and-response repetition. Nature, 2006, 217-218.
6. Botvinick, M. M., & Bylsma, L. M. (2005). Regularization in short-term memory for serial order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 31, 351-358.
7. Bryck, R. L., & Mayr, U. (2005). On the role of verbalization during task set selection: Switching or serial order control? Memory & Cognition, 33, 611-623.
8. Burgess, N., & Hitch, G. J. (2005). Computational models of working memory: putting long-term memory into context. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 535-541.
9. Burgess, N., & Hitch, G. J. (2006). A revised model of short-term memory and longterm learning of verbal sequences. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 627-652.
10. Chen, Z., & Cowan, N. (2005). Chunk limits and length limits in immediate recall: a reconciliation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 31, 1235-1249.
11. Cohen-Kdoshay, O., & Meiran, N. (2009). The representation of instructions operaties like a prepared reflex: flanker compatibility effects found in first trial following S-R instructions. Experimental Psychology, 56, 128-133.
12. Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87-185.
14. Cowan, N. (2005). Working memory capacity. New York: Psychology Press.
15. Delaney, P. F., & Sahakyan, L. (2007). Unexpected costs of high working memory capacity following directed forgetting and contextual change manipulations. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1074-1082.
16. Druey, M., & Hübner, R. (2008). Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: Evidence from repetition effects under task switching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1573-1600.
17. Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., & Chee, A. E. H. (2010). The components of working memory updating: An experimental decomposition and individual differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 170-189.
18. Ellenbogen, R., & Meiran, N. (2008). Working memory involvement in dual taks performance Evidence from the backward compatibility effect. Memory & Cognition, 36, 968-978.
19. Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 101-131.
20. Gade, M., Druey, M., & Oberauer, K. (2010). Analogous mechanisms of selection in declarative and procedural working memory: Benefits and costs of object repetition mirror those of response repetition: University of Zurich, Department of Psychology.
21. Garavan, H. (1998). Serial attention within working memory. Memory & Cognition, 26, 263-276.
22. Halford, G. S., Baker, R., McCredden, J. E., & Bain, J. D. (2004). How many variables can humans process? Psychological Science, 16, 70-76.
23. Hazeltine, E., Ruthruff, E., & Remington, R. W. (2006). The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: Evidence for content-dependent central interference. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 291-345.
24. Hick, W. E. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 11-26.
25. Hitch, G. J., Fastame, M. C., & Flude, B. (2005). How is the serial order of a verbal sequence coded? Some comparisons between models. Memory, 13, 247-258.
26. Hommel, B. (1998a). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1368-1384.
27. Hommel, B. (1998b). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183-216.
28. Hommel, B. (2000). The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and Performance XVIII: Control of Cognitive Processes (pp. 247-273). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Hommel, B., & Eglau, B. (2002). Control of stimulus-response translation in dualtask performance. Psychological Research, 66, 260-273.
30. Horner, A. J., & Henson, R. A. (2009). Bindings between stimuli and multiple response codes dominate long-lag repetition priming in speeded classification tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 757-779.
31. Hübner, M., Kluwe, R. H., Luna-Rodriguez, A., & Peters, A. (2004). Response selection difficulty and asymmetrical costs of switching between tasks and stimuli: No evidence for an exogenous component of task-set reconfiguration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 1043-1063.
32. Hulme, C., Roodenrys, S., Brown, G., & Mercer, R. (1995). The role of long-term memory mechanisms in memory span. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 527-536.
33. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
34. Kessler, Y., & Meiran, N. (2006). All updateable objects in working memory are updated whenever any of them are modified: Evidence from the memory updating paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 32, 570-585.
35. Kessler, Y., & Meiran, N. (2008). Two dissociable updating processes in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1339-1348.
36. Kessler, Y., & Meiran, N. (in press). The reaction-time task-rule congruency effect is not affected by working memory load: further support for the activated longterm memory hypothesis. Psychological Research.
37. Kübler, A., Murphy, K., Kaufman, J., Stein, E. A., & Garavan, H. (2003). Co-ordination within and between verbal and visuospatial working memory: network modulation and anterior frontal recruitment. Neurolmage, 20, 1298-1308.
38. Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., & Brown, G. D. A. (2009). No temporal decay in verbal short-term memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 120-126.
39. Liefooghe, B., Barrouillet, P., Vandierendonck, A., & Camos, V. (2008). Working memory costs of task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 478-494.
40. Liefooghe, B., Vandierendonck, A., Muyllaert, I., Verbruggen, R., & Vanneste, W. (2005). The phonological loop in task alternation and task repetition. Memory, 13, 550-560.
41. Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91, 295-327.
42. Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279-281.
43. Majerus, S., van der Linden, M., Mulder, L., Meulemans, T., & Peters, F. (2004). Verbal short-term memory reflects the sublexical organization of the phonological language network: Evidence from an incidental phonotactic learning paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 297-306.
44. Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2000). Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1124-1140.
45. McElree, B. (2006). Accessing recent events. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 46, pp. 155-200). San Diego: Academic Press.
46. Meiran, N., & Kessler, Y. (2008). The task-rule congruency effect in task switching reflects activated long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 137-157.
47. Miyake, A., Emerson, M. J., Padilla, F., & Ann, J. (2004). Inner speech as a retrieval aid for task goals: the effects of cue type and articulatory suppression in the random task cuing paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 115, 123-142.
48. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "frontal lobe" tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100.
49. Monsell, S. (1978). Recency, immediate recognition memory, and reaction time. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 465-501.
50. Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134-140.
51. Oberauer, K. (2001). Removing irrelevant information from working memory. A cognitive aging study with the modified Sternberg task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 948-957.
52. Oberauer, K. (2002). Access to information in working memory: Exploring the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 411-421.
53. Oberauer, K. (2003). Selective attention to elements in working memory. Experimental Psychology, 50, 257-269.
54. Oberauer, K. (2005). Control of the contents of working memory - a comparison of two paradigms and two age groups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 714-728.
55. Oberauer, K. (2009). Design for a working memory. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 51, 45-100.
56. Oberauer, K., & Kliegl, R. (2004). Simultaneous execution of two cognitive operations - Evidence from a continuous updating paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 689-707.
57. Oberauer, K., & Risse, S. (2006). Is the focus of attention in working memory domain general? Unpublished manuscript, University of Potsdam.
58. Oberauer, K., & Risse, S. (in press). Selection of objects and tasks in working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
59. Oberauer, K., SUB, H.-M., Wilhelm, O., & Wittmann, W. W. (2008). Which working memory functions predict intelligence? Intelligence, 36, 641-652.
60. Oberauer, K., & Vockenberg, K. (2009). Updating of working memory: Lingering bindings. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 967-987.
61. Oberauer, K., Weidenfeld, A., & Hornig, R. (2006). Working memory capacity and the construction of spatial mental models in comprehension and deductive reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 426-447.
62. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
63. Posse, B., Waszak, R., & Hommel, B. (2006). Do stimulus-response bindings survive a task switch? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15, 640-651.
64. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 50-109.
65. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
66. Rubin, O., & Meiran, N. (2005). On the origins of the task mixing cost in the cuing task-switching paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1477-1491.
67. Schmiedek, F., Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O., Süß, H. M., & Wittmann, W. W. (2007). Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 414-429.
68. Szmalec, A., Duyck, W., Vandierendonck, A., Mata, A. B., & Page, M. P. A. (2009). The Hebb repetition effect as a laboratory analogue of novel word learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 435-443.
69. Szmalec, A., Vandierendonck, A., & Kemps, E. (2005). Response selection involves executive control: Evidence from the selective interference paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 33, 531-541.
70. Szmalec, A., verbruggen, R., Vandierendonck, A., & Kemps, E. (in press). Control of interference during working memory updating. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
71. Tehan, G., & Humphreys, M. S. (1995). Transient phonemic codes and immunity to proactive interference. Memory & Cognition, 23, 181-191.
72. Vandierendonck, A., Christiaens, E., & Liefooghe, B. (2008). On the representation of task information in task switching: Evidence from task and dimension switching. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1248-1261.
73. Vandierendonck, A., & De Vooght, G. (1996). Evidence for mental-model-based reasoning: A comparison of reasoning with time and space concepts. Thinking & Reasoning, 2, 249-272.
74. Vandierendonck, A., De Vooght, G., & Van der Goten, K. (1998). Interfering with the central executive by means of a random interval repetition task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51 A, 197-218.
75. Vandierendonck, A., Deschuyteneer, M., Depoorter, A., & Drieghe, D. (2008). Input monitoring and response selection as components of executive control in prosaccades and anti-saccades. Psychological Research, 72, 1-11.
76. Vandierendonck, A., Dierckx, V., & De Vooght, G. (2004). Mental model construction in linear reasoning: Evidence for the construction of initial annotated models. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 1369-1391.
77. Verbruggen, F., Logan, G. D., Liefooghe, B., & Vandierendonck, A. (2008). Shortterm aftereffects of response inhibition: Repetition priming or between-trial control adjustments? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 413-426.
78. Wagenmakers, E.-J., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2007). An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 3-22.
79. Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361-413.
80. Waszak, F., Wenke, D., & Brass, M. (2008). Cross-talk of instructed and applied arbitrary visuomotor mappings. Acta Psychologica, 127, 30-35.
81. Wickens, D. D., Moody, M. J., & Dow, R. (1981). The nature and timing of the retrieval process and of interference effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 1-20.
82. Wilhelm, O., & Oberauer, K. (2006). Why are reasoning ability and working memory capacity related to mental speed? An investigation of stimulus-response compatibility in choice-reaction-time tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 18-50.
83. Yntema, D. B., & Mueser, G. E. (1962). Keeping track of variables that have few or many states. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 391-395.