Ethics of health research in communities: Perspectives from the Southwestern United States

Annals of Family Medicine

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 433-439

  Williams, Robert L ^a   Willging, Cathleen E ^c   Quintero, Gilbert ^d   Kalishman, Summers ^b   Sussman, Andrew L ^a   Freeman, William L ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

^c Behavioral Health Research Center of the Southwest   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

^e Northwest Indian College   (United States)

Author keywords

Community based participatory research; Confidentiality; Principle based ethics; Privacy; Third party consent

Indexed keywords

AMERICAN INDIAN; ARTICLE; CONFIDENTIALITY; ETHICS; FEMALE; HISPANIC; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; PRIVACY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

COMMUNICATION; COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; CONFIDENTIALITY; FEMALE; HISPANIC AMERICANS; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; INDIANS, NORTH AMERICAN; MALE; NEW MEXICO; PRIVACY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

EID: 77957747497     PISSN: 15441709     EISSN: 15441717     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1370/afm.1138     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Graham DG, Spano MS, Stewart TV, Staton EW, Meers A, Pace WD. Strategies for planning and launching PBRN research studies: a project of the Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network (AAFP NRN). J Am Board Fam Med. 2007;20(2):220-228.
2. Mold JW, Peterson KA. Primary care practice-based research networks: working at the interface between research and quality improvement. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3(Suppl 1):S12-S20.
3. Gilbert GH, Williams OD, Rindal DB, Pihlstrom DJ, Benjamin PL, Wallace MC; DPBRN Collaborative Group. The creation and development of the dental practice-based research network. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139(1):74-81.
4. Westfall JM, Mold J, Fagnan L. Practice-based research-"Blue Highways" on the NIH roadmap. JAMA. 2007;297(4):403-406.
5. Binns HJ, Lanier D, Pace WD, et al; Primary Care Network Survey (PRINS) Participants. Describing primary care encounters: the Primary Care Network Survey and the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5(1):39-47.
6. Minkler M, Wallerstein N, eds. Community Based Participatory Research for Health. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley and Sons; 2003.
7. National Institutes of Health. NCMHD Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) Initiative in Reducing and Eliminating Health Disparities. Intervention Research Phase (R24). May 2007. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-MD-07-003.html. Accessed Sep 29, 2008.
8. National Institutes of Health. Fact Sheet NCRR. Clinical and Translational Science Awards. May 2008. http://www.ncrr.nih.gov/publications/clinicaldiscipline/CTSA_FactSheet.pdf, Accessed Sep 29, 2008.
9. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Office of the Secretary, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Regulations and Ethical Guidelines. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. April 1979.http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.htm. Accessed Jan 28, 2010.
10. Sharp RR, Foster MW. Community involvement in the ethical review of genetic research: lessons from American Indian and Alaska Native populations. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110(Suppl 2):145-148.
11. Gbadegesin S, Wendler D. Protecting communities in health research from exploitation. Bioethics. 2006;20(5):248-253.
12. Weijer C, Anderson JA. A critical appraisal of protections for aboriginal communities in biomedical research. Jurimetrics. 2002;42(2):187-198.
13. Weijer C. Protecting communities in research: philosophical and pragmatic challenges. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1999;8(4):501-513.
14. Weijer C, Goldsand G, Emanuel EJ. Protecting communities in research: current guidelines and limits of extrapolation. Nat Genet. 1999;23(3):275-280.
15. Rubin P. Indian givers. Phoenix New Times. May 27, 2004. http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/2004-05-27/news/indian-givers. Accessed Feb 1, 2010.
16. Dalton R. When two tribes go to war. Nature. 2004;430(6999):500-502.
17. Goldzieher JW, Moses LE, Averkin E, Scheel C, Taber BZ. A placebocontrolled double-blind crossover investigation of the side effects attributed to oral contraceptives. Fertil Steril. 1971;22(9):609-623.
18. Goldzieher JW, Moses LE, Averkin E, Scheel C, Taber BZ. Nervousness and depression attributed to oral contraceptives: a double-blind, placebo- controlled study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1971;111(8):1013-1020.
19. Levine RJ. Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research. 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Urban and Schwarzenberg; 1986. Chapter 4:71-72.
20. New Mexico by Place. GCT-PH1. Population, Housing Units, Area, and Density: 2000. http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/GCTTable?_bm=y&-context=gct&-ds_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U&-mt_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U_GCTPH1_ST1&-tree_id=4001&-redoLog=false&-_caller=geoselect&-geo_id=04000US35&-format=ST-7{pipe}ST-7S&-_lang=en. Accessed Mar 26, 2009.
21. NVivo. http://www.qsrinternational.com. QSR International, Sept 2008. Accessed Sept 29, 2008.
22. Flicker S, Travers R, Guta A, McDonald S, Meagher A. Ethical dilemmas in community-based participatory research: recommendations for institutional review boards. J Urban Health. 2007;84(4):478-493.
23. Darou WG, Hum A, Kurtness J. An investigation of the impact of psychosocial research on a Native population. Prof Psychol Res Pr. 1993;24(3):325-329.
24. Weijer C, Miller PB. Protecting communities in pharmacogenetic and pharmacogenomic research. Pharmacogenomics J. 2004;4(1):9-16.
25. Manson S, ed. Am Indian Alsk Native Ment Health Res. [entire issue] 1989;2(3):5-90.
26. Davis SM, Reid R. Practicing participatory research in American Indian communities. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69(4)(Suppl):755S-759S.
27. Freeman WL, Romero FC, Kanade S. Community consultation to assess and minimize group harms. In: Amdur RJ, Bankert EA (eds). Institutional Review Board: Management and Function. 2nd ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2006:Chapter 5-4,134-139.
28. Weijer C. Benefit-sharing and other protections for communities in genetic research. Clin Genet. 2000;58(5):367-368.
29. Weijer C, Goldsand G, Emanuel EJ. Protecting communities in research: current guidelines and limits of extrapolation. Nat Genet. 1999;23(3):275-280.
30. Hueston WJ, Mainous AG III, Weiss BD, Macaulay AC, Hickner J, Sherwood RA; North American Primary Care Research Group; Society of Teachers of Family Medicine. Protecting participants in family medicine research: a consensus statement on improving research integrity and participants' safety in educational research, community- based participatory research, and practice network research. Fam Med. 2006;38(2):116-120.
31. Quinn SC. Ethics in public health research: protecting human subjects: the role of community advisory boards. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(6):918-922.
32. National Health & Medical Research Council. Values and Ethics: Guidelines for Ethical Conduct in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Research. Canberra, ACT, Australia: National Health & Medical Research Council, 2003. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/file/health_ethics/human/conduct/guidelines/e52.pdf. Accessed Dec 24, 2009.
33. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. CIHR Guidelines for Health Research Involving Aboriginal People. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, 2007. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/documents/ethics_aboriginal_guidelines_e.pdf. Accessed Dec 24, 2009.
34. Health Research Council of New Zealand. Guidelines for Researchers on Health Research Involving Ma-ori. Auckland, New Zealand: Health Research Council of New Zealand, 2008. http://www.hrc.govt.nz/assets/pdfs/publications/MHGuidelines%202008%20FINAL.pdf. Accessed Jan 4, 2010.
35. Quigley D. A review of improved ethical practices in environmental and public health research: case examples from native communities. Health Educ Behav. 2006;33(2):130-147.
36. Weijer C, Emanuel EJ. Ethics. Protecting communities in biomedical research. Science. 2000;289(5482):1142-1144.
37. Watkins BX, Shepard PM, Corbin-Mark CD. Completing the circle: a model for effective community review of environmental health research. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(Suppl 3):S567-S577.
38. Wallwork E. Ethical analysis of research partnerships with communities. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2008;18(1):57-85.
39. Macaulay AC, Commanda LE, Freeman WL, et al.; North American Primary Care Research Group. Participatory research maximises community and lay involvement. BMJ. 1999;319(7212):774-778.
40. Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C. An ethical framework for biomedical research. In: Emanuel EJ, Grady C, Crouch RA, et al (Eds). The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2008:123-135.
41. Brugge D, Missaghian M. Protecting the Navajo People through tribal regulation of research. Sci Eng Ethics. 2006;12(3):491-507.
42. Native American Law Center. Model Tribal Research Code. 3rd ed. Albuquerque, NM: Native American Law Center; 1999.
43. McGrath MM, Fullilove RE, Kaufman MR, Wallace R, Fullilove MT. The limits of collaboration: a qualitative study of community ethical review of environmental health research. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(8):1510-1514.
44. Williams RL, Shelley BM, Sussman AL; RIOS Net clinicians. The marriage of community-based participatory research and practice- based research networks: can it work? A Research Involving Outpatient Settings Network (RIOS Net) study. J Am Board Fam Med. 2009;22(4):428-435.