Relationship between reading comprehension strategy use and daily free reading time

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 4752-4756

  Kirmizi, Fatma Susar ^a  

^a PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

primary education; Reading comprehension strategies; relationship; time spent reading

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957741694     PISSN: 18770428     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.763     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Aarnoutse, C., & Leeuwe, J. V. (1998). Relation between reading comprehension, vocabulary, reading pleasure, and reading frequency. Educational Research and Evaluation, 4, no. 2: 143-166.
2. Abu-Rabia, S. (1996). Attitudes and cultural background and their relationship to reading comprehension in a second language: a comparison of three different social contexts. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6, no. 1: 81-107.
3. Allen, S. (2003). An analitic comparison of three models of reading strategy instruction, Internal Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 41, no. 4: 319.
4. Baştürk, R. (2009). Eǧitim bilimlerinde yöntem [Methodology in educational sciences]. In Eǧitim bilimine giriş (170-184). Ankara. Ani Yayicilik.
5. Baykul, Y. (1999). İstatistik metotlar ve uygulamalar [Statistical methods and practices]. Ankara. Ani Yayincilik.
6. Block, C., & Pressley, M. (2002). Comprehension instruction: research-based best practices. New York: Guilford Press.
7. Block, C. C., Rodgers, L.L. &Johnson, R.B. (2006). Comprehension process instruction-creating reading succes in grades K-3. New York-London: The Guilford Press.
8. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi elkitabi: istatistik, araştirma deseni, spss uygulamalari ve yorum[Handbook of data analysis for social studies: statistics, reseach design, SPSS procedures, and interpretation].. Ankara: Pegem Yayincilik.
9. Harris, T. L. & Hodges, R.E. (1995). The literacy dictionary: The vocabulary of reading and writing, Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
10. Harvey, S. & Goodvis, A. (2002). Strategies that work: teaching comprehension to enhance understanding. York ME: Stenhouse Publisher.
11. In: Allen S. 2003. An analytic comparison of three models of reading strategy instruction. Internal Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), ProQuest Education Journals, 41, no. 4: 319.
12. Karasar, N. (2005). Bilimsel araştirma yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayincilik.
13. Keer, H. V. & Verhaeghe J. P. (2005). Effects of explicit reading strategies instruction and peer tutoring on second and fifth graders' reading comprehension and self-efficiency perception. The Journal of Experimental Education, 73, no. 4: 291-329.
14. Learning Point Associates, (2004). A closer look at the five essential components of effective reading instruction: a review of scientifically based reading research for teachers. Retriewed on December 13, 2007 from http://www.learningpt.org
15. Lenski, S.& Lewis, J. (2008). Reading success for struggling adolescent learners. New York-London: The Guilford Press.
16. Lories, G., Dardenne, B., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (1998). From social cognition to metacognition. In V. Y. Yzerbyt, G. Lories, & B. Dardenne (Eds.), Metacognition. Cognitive and social dimensions. London: Sage Publication.
17. McNamara, D.S. (2007). Reading comprehension strategies. Theories, interventions and technologies. New York-London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates-Taylor & Francis Group.
18. Meissner , J. & Yun, T.C. (2008). Verbal solution guide. Manhattan: Manhattan Review
19. Salinger, T. & Fleischman, S. (2005). Teaching students to interact with text. Educational Leadership, 63, no. 2: 90-92.
20. Senemoǧlu, N. (2001). Gelişim öǧrenme ve öǧretim kuramdan uygulamaya [Development, learning and teaching from theory to practice]. Ankara: Ethem Publication.
21. Snider, V.E. (1989). Reading comprehension performance of adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 12, 87-96.
22. th grade students at primary school] . Unpublished PhD. İzmir: Dokuz Eylül University.
23. Sweet, E.P. & Snow, C.E. (2003). Rethinking reading comprehension. New York: The Guilford Press.
24. Tankersley, K. (2003). The threads of reading strategies for literacy development. Virginia USA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum. Development (ASCD) Publication.
25. Wormeli, R. (2004). Summarization in any subject: 50 techniques to improve student learning. Alexandria, VA, USA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
26. Vacca, R. & Vacca J. (1986). Content area reading (2. Ed). Little and Brown, pre reading.