Design and characterization of a laminar flow-through dissolution apparatus: Comparison of hydrodynamic conditions to those of common dissolution techniques

Pharmaceutical Development and Technology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 75-87

  Greco, Kristyn ^a   Bergman, Theodore L ^a   Bogner, Robin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

Dissolution apparatus; Flow through; Raman; Rotating disk; Salt form; Solution mediated phase transformation

Indexed keywords

2 NAPHTHOIC ACID; KETOPROFEN; TRIAMTERENE;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISSOLUTION; DRUG FORMULATION; DRUG SCREENING; FLOW THROUGH DISSOLUTION APPARATUS; FLUID FLOW; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; HYDRODYNAMICS; LABORATORY APPARATUS, EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; LAMINAR FLOW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAMAN SPECTROMETRY; STEREOMICROSCOPY;

CARBOXYLIC ACIDS; CHROMATOGRAPHY, HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID; DRUG DISCOVERY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HYDRODYNAMICS; KETOPROFEN; MODELS, CHEMICAL; NAPHTHALENES; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS; PHASE TRANSITION; ROTATION; SOLUBILITY; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS, RAMAN; TRIAMTERENE;

EID: 77957741630     PISSN: 10837450     EISSN: 10979867     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/10837450903499341     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Lobenberg R, Amidon GL. Modern bioavailability, bioequivalence and biopharmaceutics classification system. New scientific approaches to international regulatory standards. Eur J Pharmaceut Biopharmaceut 2000;50(1):3-12.
2. Yu LX, Carlin AS, Amidon GL, Hussain AS. Feasibility studies of utilizing disk intrinsic dissolution rate to classify drugs. Int J Pharm 2004;270(1-2):221-227.
3. Emami J. In vitro-in vivo correlation: From theory to applications. J Pharm Pharmaceut Sci 2006;9(2):169-189.
4. The United States Pharmacopeia (USP). 32nd ed. Rockville: United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc; 2009.
5. Baxter JL, Kukura J, Muzzio FJ. Hydrodynamics-induced variability in the USP apparatus II dissolution test. Int J Pharmaceut 2005;292(1-2):17-28.
6. Kukura J, Baxter JL, Muzzio FJ. Shear distribution and variability in the USP Apparatus 2 under turbulent conditions. Int J Pharmaceut 2004;279(1-2):9-17.
7. Bird RB, Stewart WE, Lightfoot EN. Transport phenomena. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2002. p 895.
8. Dressman J, Kraemer J, editors. Pharmaceutical dissolution testing. London: Taylor & Francis; 2005. p 429.
9. Probstein RF. Physicochemical hydrodynamics. An introduction. Boston, MA: Butterworths; 1989. p 368.
10. Abrahamsson B, Pal A, Sjoeberg M, Carlsson M, Laurell E, Brasseur JG. A novel in vitro and numerical analysis of shear-induced drug release from extended-release tablets in the fed stomach. Pharmaceut Res 2005;22(8):1215- 1226.
11. Panton R. Incompressible flow. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1996. p 837.
12. Geankoplis CJ. Transport processes and unit operations.New York: Allyn and Bacon; 1978. p 650.
13. Pal A, Indireshkumar K, Schwizer W, Abrahamsson B, Fried M, Brasseur James G. Gastric flow and mixing studied using computer simulation. Proceedings Biological sciences/The Royal Society 2004;271(1557):2587-2594.
14. Levich VG. Physicochemical hydrodynamics. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1962. p 700.
15. Avdeef A, Tsinman O. Miniaturized rotating disk intrinsic dissolution rate measurement: Effects of buffer capacity in comparisons to traditional Wood's apparatus. Pharmaceut Res 2008;25(11):2613-2627.
16. Shah AC, Nelson KG. Evaluation of a convective diffusion drug dissolution rate model. J Pharmaceut Sci 1975;64(9):1518-1520.
17. Neervannan S, Reinert JD, Stella VJ, Southard MZ. A numerical convective-diffusion of neutral compounds under laminar flow conditions. Int J Pharmaceut 1993;96(1-3):167-174.
18. Constantinescu VN. Laminar viscous flow. New York: Springer; 1995. p 488.
19. White F. Fluid mechanics. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1979. p 701.
20. Brazel CS, Peppas NA. Mechanisms of solute and drug transport in relaxing, swellable, hydrophilic glassy polymers. Polymer 1999;40(12):3383-3398.
21. Grijseels H, De Blaey CJ. Dissolution at porous interfaces. V. Pore effects in a parallel-plate dissolution cell. Int J Pharmaceut 1983;16(3):295-304.
22. Sun W, Larive CK, Southard MZ. A mechanistic study of danazol dissolution in ionic surfactant solutions. J Pharmaceut Sci 2003;92(2):424-435.
23. Wurster DE, Seitz JA. Drug release from solids. III. Effect of a changing surface-weight ratio on the dissolution rate. J Am Pharmaceut Assoc, Sci Ed 1960;49:335-338.
24. McNamara DP, Amidon GL. Dissolution of acidic and basic compounds from the rotating disk: Influence of convective diffusion and reaction. J Pharmaceut Sci 1986;75(9):858-868.
25. Dittert LW, Higuchi T, Reese DR. Phase solubility technique in studying the formation of complex salts of triamterene. J Pharmaceut Sci 1964;53(11):1325-1328.
26. Southard MZ, Green DW, Stella VJ, Himmelstein KJ. Dissolution of ionizable drugs into unbuffered solution: A comprehensive model for mass transport and reaction in the rotating disk geometry. Pharmaceut Res 1992; 9 (1): 58-69.