Protocol for population testing of an Internet-based Personalised Decision Support system for colorectal cancer screening

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Wilson, Carlene J ^a,b   Flight, Ingrid H K ^c   Zajac, Ian T ^c   Turnbull, Deborah ^d   Young, Graeme P ^a   Cole, Stephen R ^a,e   Gregory, Tess ^a  

^a FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b CANCER COUNCIL SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^c CSIRO   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^e REPATRIATION GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COLORECTAL TUMOR; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SAMPLE SIZE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

AUSTRALIA; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERNET; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SELECTION; SAMPLE SIZE;

EID: 77957734481     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-50     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. National Bowel Cancer Screening Program monitoring report. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare & Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra: AIHW 2009
2. National Bowel Cancer Screening Program monitoring report. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare & Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra: AIHW 2008
3. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. JS Mandel JH Bond TR Church DC Snover GM Bradley LM Schuman F Ederer, New England Journal of Medicine 1993 328 19 1365 1371 10.1056/NEJM199305133281901 8474513
4. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. JD Hardcastle JO Chamberlain MHE Robinson SM Moss SS Amar TW Balfour PD James CM Mangham, Lancet 1996 348 1472 1477 10.1016/S0140-6736(96) 03386-7 8942775
5. Randomized study of biennial screening with a faecal occult blood test: results after nine screening rounds. O Kronborg OD Jorgensen C Fenger M Rasmussen, Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 2004 39 9 846 851 10.1080/00365520410003182 15513382
6. The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer. JS Mandel TR Church JH Bond F Ederer MS Geisser SJ Mongin DC Snover LM Schuman, New England Journal of Medicine 2000 343 22 1603 1607 10.1056/NEJM200011303432203 11096167
7. Population screening for colorectal cancer: the implications of an ageing population. DAL Macafee M Waller DK Whynes S Moss JH Scholefield, British Journal of Cancer 2008 99 1991 2000 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604788 19034277
8. Underestimation of breast cancer risk: influence on screening behavior. MC Katapodi MJ Dodd KA Lee NC Facione, Oncology Nursing Forum 2009 36 306 314 10.1188/09.ONF.306-314 19403452
9. Attitudes towards and beliefs about colorectal cancer and screening using the faecal occult blood test within the Italian-Australian community. J Severino C Wilson D Turnbull A Duncan T Gregory, Asia-Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 2009 10 387 394
10. Colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing: community intention, knowledge, beliefs and behaviour. S Tong K Hughes BB Oldenburg CD Mar, Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health 2006 18 16 23 10.1177/ 10105395060180010401 16629434
11. Exploratory study examining barriers to participation in colorectal cancer screening. JS Paddison MJ Yip, Australian Journal of Rural Health 2010 18 11 15 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2009.01114.x 20136809
12. A randomised trial of the impact of new faecal haemoglobin test technologies on population participation in screening for colorectal cancer. SR Cole GP Young A Esterman B Cadd J Morcom, Journal of Medical Screening 2003 10 117 122 10.1258/096914103769011003 14561262
13. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. AM O'Connor CL Bennett D Stacey M Barry NF Col KB Eden VA Entwistle V Fiset M Holmes-Rovner S Khangura, et al. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009 8 3
14. Development and initial testing of a computer-based patient decision aid to promote colorectal cancer screening for primary care practice. J Kim A Whitney S Hayter C Lewis M Campbell L Sutherland B Fowler S Googe R McCoy M Pignone, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2005 5 36 10.1186/1472-6947-5-36 16313676
15. Are cancer-related decision aids effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis. MA O'Brien TJ Whelan M Villasis-Keever A Gafni C Charles R Roberts S Schiff W Cai, Journal of Clinical Oncology 2009 27 974 985 10.1200/JCO.2007.16.0101 19124808
16. Stage theories of health behaviour: conceptual and methodological issues. N Weinstein A Rothman S Sutton, Health Psychology 1998 17 290 299 10.1037/0278-6133.17.3.290 9619480
17. Predicting health behavior: Research and practice with social cognition models. M Conner P Norman, Philadelphia: Open University Press 1999
18. Factorial validity and invariance of a survey measuring psychosocial correlates of colorectal cancer screening among African Americans and Caucasians. JA Tiro SW Vernon T Hyslop RE Myers, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 2005 14 2855 2861
19. Development and validation of an instrument to measure factors related to colorectal cancer screening adherence. SW Vernon RE Myers BC Tilley, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 1997 6 825 832
20. Cross-cultural validation of the Preventive Health Model for colorectal cancer screening: An Australian study. IH Flight CJ Wilson J McGillivray RE Myers, Health Education and Behavior
21. The precaution adoption process. ND Weinstein, Health Psychology 1988 7 355 386 10.1037/0278-6133.7.4.355 3049068
22. Tailored messaging in colorectal cancer screening. RE Myers R Sifri T Hyslop M Rosenthal R Wender S Vernon, Proceedings of Toward Better Theories of Health Behavior Conference Santa Fe, New Mexico: National Cancer Institute Behavioral Research Program 2002 http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/brp/ presentations-1/PDFs/myers-presentation-final.pdf Accessed 15 June 2010
23. How effective is tailored print communication? CS Skinner MK Campbell BK Rimer S Curry JO Prochaska, Annals of Behavioral Medicine 1999 21 290 298 10.1007/BF02895960 10721435
24. Screening with faecal occult blood test (FOBT) for colorectal cancer: assessment of two methods that attempt to improve compliance. L Ore L Hagoel I Lvi G Rennert, European Journal of Cancer Prevention 2001 10 251 256 10.1097/00008469-200106000-00008 11432712
25. The effectiveness of web-based versus non-web-based interventions: A meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes. DJ Wantland P CJ WL Holzemer R Slaughter EM McGhee, Journal of Medical Internet Research 2004 6.40 10.2196/jmir.6.4.e40
26. Consumer Information Booklet. National Bowel Cancer Screening Program, Department of Health and Ageing Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia 2009
27. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. J Ritchie L Spencer, Analysing qualitative data London: Routledge, Bryman A, Burgess R, 1994 173 194 full-text
28. The philosophical framework of measurement. A Bowling, Bowling Research Methods in Health: Investigating Health and Health Services Buckingham, U.K.: Open University Press 1997 101 116
29. Internet access for delivery of health information to South Australians older than 50. C Wilson I Flight E Hart D Turnbull S Cole G Young, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 2008 32 174 176 10.1111/j.1753-6405. 2008.00196.x 18412690
30. Remoteness of residence and survival from cancer in New South Wales. KE Jong DP Smith QY Xue DL O'Connell D Goldstein BK Armstrong, Medical Journal of Australia 2004 180 618 622 15200358
31. Costs of accessing surgical specialists by rural and remote residents. SL Rankin W Hughes-Anderson AK House DI Heath RJ Aitken J House, Australia and New Zealand Journal of Surgery 2001 71 544 547 10.1046/j.1440-1622.2001.02188.x (Pubitemid 32848247)
32. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. A O'Connor, Journal of Medical Decision Making 1995 15 25 30 10.1177/0272989X9501500105
33. Validating the theoretical structure of the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ) across three different health behaviors. CS Levesque GC Williams D Eliot MA Pickering B Bodenhamer PJ Finlay, Health Education Research 2007 22 691 702 10.1093/her/cyl148 17138613