Rényi entropy of a line in two-dimensional Ising models

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 82, Issue 12, 2010, Pages

  Stephan J M ^a   Misguich, G ^a   Pasquier, V ^a  

^a DIF   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957730272     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.125455     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. L. Amico, R. Fazio, A. Osterloh, and V. Vedral, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 517 (2008). 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.517
2. S. Furukawa and G. Misguich, Phys. Rev. B 75, 214407 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.214407
3. D. S. Rokhsar and S. A. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2376 (1988). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2376
4. C. L. Henley, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16, S891 (2004). 10.1088/0953-8984/16/11/045
5. J.-M. Stéphan, S. Furukawa, G. Misguich, and V. Pasquier, Phys. Rev. B 80, 184421 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.184421
6. This quantum/classical correspondence works in a rather straightforward way for simple constrained models (such as dimer models or vertex models). For other models, such as the Ising model considered in this paper, some additional care is needed to define the geometry of the A / B boundary at the microscopic level. In the particular case of 2D classical Ising models, the spins living at the frontier between A and B have to be "duplicated" to insure that the decomposition induced by the classical spin configurations is indeed a proper Schmidt decomposition of the RK state. See Ref. for more details.
7. E. Fradkin and J. E. Moore, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 050404 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.050404
8. B. Hsu, M. Mulligan, E. Fradkin, and E.-A. Kim, Phys. Rev. B 79, 115421 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.115421
9. In the quantum point of view, where one studies the entanglement in a RK wave function, the dominant (∼ L) contribution is the boundary (also called "area") law.
10. The field-theory prediction of Ref. is r 1 (T = T c) = ln (2) and does not agree with our numerical calculations. Remark: r 1 corresponds to S 0 (x) in the notations of Ref..
11. I. Affleck and A. W. W. Ludwig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 161 (1991). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.161
12. T c = 2 / ln (1 + √ 2) on the square lattice (Refs.) and T c = 4 / ln (3) on the triangular lattice (Ref.).
13. H. A. Kramers and G. H. Wannier, Phys. Rev. 60, 252 (1941). 10.1103/PhysRev.60.252
14. We also use the property that, for periodic boundary conditions, i σ i z = 1 in the ground state | G. Since we work in the σ z basis, this reduces by another factor two the number of probabilities to compute.
15. J. Sawada, SIAM J. Comput. 31, 259 (2001). 10.1137/S0097539700377037
16. In fact, the analysis of Sec. suggests that r n (μ c) flows to its ferromagnetic boundary condition limit, ln(2), as soon as n > 1.
17. L. Campos Venuti, H. Saleur, and P. Zanardi, Phys. Rev. B 79, 092405 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.092405
18. R. J. Baxter, Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Mechanics (Dover, Mineola, 1982).
19. S. Katsura, Phys. Rev. 127, 1508 (1962). 10.1103/PhysRev.127.1508
20. M. Levin and X.-G. Wen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 110405 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.110405
21. A. Kitaev and J. Preskill, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 110404 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.110404
22. J. L. Cardy, Nucl. Phys. B 324, 581 (1989). 10.1016/0550-3213(89)90521-X
23. J. Dubail, J. L. Jacobsen, and H. Saleur, Nucl. Phys. B 834, 399 (2010). 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.02.016
24. M. A. Metlitski, C. A. Fuertes, and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 80, 115122 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.115122
25. F. Gliozzi and L. Tagliacozzo, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. (2010), P01002. 10.1088/1742-5468/2010/01/P01002
26. The Rényi entropy can be computed for complex values of n and one can detect possible singularities by analyzing the locations of the its zeros in the complex plane, as was done in Ref. for a different model. However, in our case, such an approach does not seem to shed more light on the n = 1 issue than the real-axis analysis presented here.
27. ) 2, where the field is compactified on a circle of radius R: φ = φ + 2 π R.
28. Mo. Oshikawa, arXiv:1007.3789 (unpublished).
29. P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. (2004), P06002. 10.1088/1742-5468/2004/06/P06002
30. C. Holzhey, F. Larsen, and F. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. B 424, 443 (1994). 10.1016/0550-3213(94)90402-2
31. V. B. Petkova and J.-B. Zuber, Phys. Lett. B 504, 157 (2001). 10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00276-3
32. M. Oshikawa and I. Affleck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2604 (1996). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2604
33. L. Onsager, Phys. Rev. 65, 117 (1944). 10.1103/PhysRev.65.117
34. R. Houtappel, Physica (Amsterdam) 16, 425 (1950). 10.1016/0031-8914(50) 90130-3