The effects of gender, perceived social support and sociometric status on academic success

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 3801-3805

  Bahar, Hüseyin Hüsnü ^a  

^a ERZINCAN UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

academic success; gender; Perceived social support; sociometric status; teacher education

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957716572     PISSN: 18770428     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.593     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Alpar, R. (1997). Uygulamali Çok Deǧişkenli İstatistiksel Yöntemlere Giriş-I (1st ed)., Ankara: Baǧirgan Yayinevi.
2. Adler, P. A., Kless, S. J., & Adler, P. (1992). Socialization to gender roles: popularity among elementary school boys and girls. Sociology of Education, 65, 169-187.
3. Austin, A.B. & Draper, D.C., (1984). The relationship among peer acceptance, social impact, and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 21(3),597-604.
4. Bahar, H. H. (2006). KPSS puanlarinin akademik başari ve cinsiyet açisindan deǧerlendirilmesi, Eǧitim ve Bilim, 31(140), 68-74.
5. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2008). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabi, Ankara: Perem-A Yayinevi.
6. Chen, X., Chang, L., Liu, H. & He, Y. (2008), Effects of the peer group on the development of social functioning and academic achievement: a longitudinal study in chinese children. Child Development, 79(2): 235-251.
7. Cutrano, C.E., Cole, V., Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. & Russel, D. (1994)., Perceived parent social support and academic-achievement an attachment theory perspective, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66 (2), 369-378.
8. Cüceloǧlu, D. (1996). İnsan ve Davranişi, İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
9. Çetin,F., Bilbay, A.A. & Kaymak, D.A. (2003). Araştirmadan Uygulamaya Çocuklarda Sosyal Beceriler-Grup Eǧitimi, İstanbul: Epsilon Yayincilik.
10. Duckworth, A.L., Seligman, M. E. (2006). Self-discipline gives girls the edge: gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98 (1), 198-208.
11. Dökmen, Ü. (1987). Empati kurma becerisi ile sosyometrik statü arasindaki ilişki, Ankara Üniversitesi Eǧitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 20 (1), 183-207.
12. Eccles, J. S. (2007). Families, schools, and developing achievement-related motivations and engagement. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of Socialization (pp. 665-691). New York: The Guilford Press.
13. Eker, D., Arkar, H. & Yaldiz, H. (2001). Çok boyutlu algilanan sosyal destek ölçeǧinin gözden geçirilmiş formunun faktör yapisi geçerlik ve güvenirliǧi. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 12 (1), 17-25.
14. Felmlee, D. H. (2003). Interaction in social networks. In J. Delameter (Ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers (pp. 389-409).
15. Hopmeyer Gorman, A., Kim, J., & Schimmelbusch, A. (2002). The attributes adolescents associate with peer popularity and teacher preference. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 143-165.
16. Kaya, A. & Siyez, D. M. (2008). Sociometric status and life satisfaction among turkish elementary school students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 32, 69-82.
17. Kongar, E. (2002). Toplumsal Deǧişme Kuramlari ve Türkiye Gerçeǧi, İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
18. LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2002). Children's perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multimethod assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38, 635-647.
19. Lubbers, M.J., Van Der Werf, M.P.C., Snijders, T.A.B., Bert P.M. Creemers, B.P.M. & Kuyper, H. (2006). The impact of peer relations on academic progress in junior high. Journal of School Psychology, 44 (6), 491-512.
20. Mau, W. C. & Lynn, R. (2001). Gender differences on the scholastic aptitude test the American college test and college grades. Educational Psychology, 21 (2), 133-136. (Pubitemid 33282102)
21. Öztürk, E. (2007). Çoklu Doǧrusal Regresyon Modeli, In Ş. Kalayci (Ed.), SPSS Uygulamali Çok Deǧişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri, Ankara: Asil Yayin Daǧitim, (pp. 259-272).
22. Parkhurst, J. T., & Hopmeyer, A. G. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 18, 125-144. (Pubitemid 128064794)
23. Peker, R. (2003)., Uludaǧ üniversitesi eǧitim fakültesi beden eǧitimi ve spor bölümü öǧrencilerinin genel akademik başarilarinin bazi deǧişkenlere göre incelenmesi, Uludaǧ Üniversitesi Eǧitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17 (1), 161-171.
24. Pomerantz, E.M., Altermatt, E. R., & Saxson, J. L. (2002). Making the grade but feeling distressed: gender differences in academic performance and internal distress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94 (2), 396-404.
25. Roeser, R. W., Eccles, J. S., & Sameroff, A. J. (2000). School as a context of early adolescents' academic and social-emotional development: A summary of research findings. The Elementary School Journal, 100, 443-471.
26. Rosenfeld, L. B., Richman, J. M., & Bowen, G. L. (2000). Social support networks and school outcomes: The centrality of the teacher. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 17, 205-226.
27. Szabo, A.G; (1994)., Personal relationship and social support, The Journal of Contemporary Human Services. 75 (2), 123-125.
28. Yildirim, İ. (1997). Algilanan sosyal destek ölç eǧinin geliştirilmesi güvenirliǧi ve geçerliǧi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eǧitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13, 81-87.
29. Yildirim, İ. (2007). Akademik başarinin yordayicisi olarak gündelik sikintilar ve sosyal destek. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eǧitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30, 258-267.
30. Wentzel, K. R. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: the role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 202-209. (Pubitemid 128092627)
31. Zimet G.D., Dahlem N.W,, Zimet S.G. & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 30-41.