Health technology adoption and the politics of governance in the UK

Social Science and Medicine

Volumn 63, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 3102-3112

  Milewa, Timothy ^a  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Health policy; Health technology appraisal; Health technology assessment; NICE; Public involvement; UK

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; DECISION MAKING; DRUG; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; HEALTH CARE; POLITICAL POWER; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION;

ARTICLE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; FUNDING; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; POLITICS; UNITED KINGDOM;

DECISION MAKING; DEMOCRACY; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; POLICY MAKING; POLITICS; STATE MEDICINE; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

ENGLAND; EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WALES; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 33750458688     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.009     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Abacus International. NICE guidance implementation tracking: Data sources, methodology and results, 27 January 2005 (report) (2005), National Institute for Clinical Excellence, London
2. Appleby J., and Alvarez Rosete A. The NHS: Keeping up with public expectations?. In: Park A., Curtice J., Thomson K., Jarvis L., and Bromley C. (Eds). British social attitudes: The 20th report: Continuity and change over two decades (2003), Sage, London
3. Baggott R. A funny thing happened on the way to the forum? Reforming patient and public involvement in the NHS in England. Public Administration 83 3 (2005) 533-551
4. Baggott R., Allsop J., and Jones K. Speaking for patients and carers: Health consumer groups and the policy process (2005), Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke
5. Brown P., Zavestoski S., McCormick S., Mayer B., Morello-Frosch R., and Altman R. Embodied health movements: New approaches to social movements in health. Sociology of Health and Illness 26 1 (2004) 50-80
6. Byrne D. Evidence-based: What constitutes valid evidence?. In: Gray A., and Harrison S. (Eds). Governing medicine: Theory and practice (2004), Open University Press, Maidenhead
7. Calnan M., and Gabe J. From consumerism to partnership? Britain's National Health Service at the turn of the century. International Journal of Health Services 31 1 (2001) 119-131
8. Chalmers T. The impact of controlled trials on the practice of medicine. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine 41 6 (1974) 753-759
9. Cohen J. Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In: Bohman J., and Rehg W. (Eds). Deliberative democracy: Essays on reasoning and politics (1997), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
10. Contandriopoulos D. A sociological perspective on public participation in health care. Social Science & Medicine 58 2 (2004) 321-330
11. Davies C., Wetherell M., Barnett E., and Seymour-Smith S. Opening the box: Evaluating the citizens council of NICE (Report) (2005), School of Health and Social Welfare, Open University, Milton Keynes
12. Department of Health. The new NHS: Modern, dependable, Cm. 3807 (1997), Stationary Office, London
13. Department of Health. Choosing health: Making healthy choices easier, Cm. 6374 (2004), Stationary Office, London
14. Elwyn G., and Edwards A. Evidence-based patient choice?. In: Edwards A., and Elwyn G. (Eds). Evidence-based patient choice: Inevitable or impossible? (2001), Oxford University Press, Oxford
15. Fox J. The role of the expert patient in the management of chronic illness. British Journal of Nursing 14 1 (2005) 25-28
16. Fung A., and Wright E.O. Countervailing power in empowered participatory governance. In: Fung A., and Wright E.O. (Eds). Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance (Real Utopias Project, vol. IV) (2003), Verso, London
17. Gibbons R., Smith S., and Antman E. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association clinical practice guidelines, part II: Evolutionary changes in a continuous quality improvement project. Circulation 107 24 (2003) 3101-3107
18. Gieryn T. Boundaries of Science. In: Jasanoff S., Markle G., Petersen J., and Pinch T. (Eds). Handbook of science and technology studies (1995), Sage, Thousand Oaks
19. Goldsmith S., and Eggers W. Governing by network: The new shape of the public sector (2004), Brookings Institution, Washington, DC
20. Gutmann A., and Thompson D. Why deliberative democracy? (2004), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
21. Hajer M. A frame in the fields: Policymaking and the reinvention of politics. In: Hajer M., and Wagenaar H. (Eds). Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
22. Harrison S. The politics of evidence based medicine. Policy and Politics 26 1 (1998) 15-31
23. Haywood S., and Hunter D. Consultative processes in health policy in the United Kingdom: A view from the centre. Public Administration 60 2 (1982) 143-162
24. Hill S., Garattini S., Loenhout J.v., O'Brien B., and Joncheere K.d. Technology Appraisal Programme of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence: A review by WHO (report) (2003), WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen
25. Innes J., and Booher D. Collaborative policymaking: Governance through dialogue. In: Hajer M., and Wagenaar H. (Eds). Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
26. Jessop B. Multi-level governance and multi-level metagovernance. In: Bache I., and Flinders M. (Eds). Multi-level governance (2004), Oxford University Press, Oxford
27. Kelly G., Mulgan G., and Muers S. Creating public value: An analytical framework for public service reform (report) (2002), Cabinet Office Strategy Unit, London
28. Kennedy I. Learning from Bristol: The report of the public enquiry into children's heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984-1995 (The Kennedy report), Cm. 5207(1) (2001), The Stationary Office, London
29. Lauman E., and Knoke D. The organizational state: Social choice in national policy domains (1987), University of Wisconsin Press, Madison
30. Levine P., Fung A., and Gastil J. Future directions for public deliberation. In: Gastil J., and Levine P. (Eds). The deliberative democracy handbook: Strategies for effective civic engagement in the 21st Century (2005), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
31. Leys M. Health care policy: Qualitative evidence and health technology assessment. Health Policy 65 3 (2003) 217-226
32. Marshall T.H. Citizenship and social class. In: Marshall T.H. (Ed). Sociology at the crossroads and other essays (1963), Heinemann, London [1950]
33. Milewa T. Local participatory democracy in Britain's health service: Innovation or fragmentation of a universal citizenship?. Social Policy and Administration 38 3 (2004) 240-252
34. Milewa T., and Barry C. Health policy and the politics of evidence. Social Policy and Administration 39 5 (2005) 498-512
35. Milewa T., Harrison S., and Dowswell G. Public involvement and democratic accountability in primary care organisations. In: Dowling B., and Glendinning C. (Eds). The new primary care: Modern, dependable, successful? (2003), Open University Press, Buckingham
36. National Health Service Management Executive. Local voices: The views of local people in purchasing for health (report) (1992), National Health Service Management Executive, London
37. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Applicants' Introduction to the Citizens Council (document) (2002), National Institute for Clinical Excellence, London
38. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. A report on a Study to Evaluate Patient/Carer Membership of the first NICE Guideline Development Groups (report) (2004), National Institute for Clinical Excellence, London
39. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. A guide to NICE (document) (2005), National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London
40. Newman J., Barnes M., Sullivan H., and Knops A. Public participation and collaborative governance. Journal of Social Policy 33 2 (2004) 203-223
41. O'Donnell M., and Entwistle V. Consumer involvement in decisions about what health-related research is funded. Health Policy 70 3 (2004) 281-290
42. Offer J. Idealist thought, social policy and the rediscovery of informal care. British Journal of Sociology 50 3 (1999) 467-488
43. Office of Science and Technology. The advisory and regulatory framework for biotechnology: Report for the government's review (1999), Office of Science and Technology, London
44. O'Flynn, J. (2005). Adding Public Value: A new era of contractual governance? (Conference paper). Public administration and management conference, University of Nottingham, 5-7 September 2005.
45. Oliver S., et al. Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: Developing an evidence-based approach (report). Health Technology Assessment 8 15 (2004)
46. Parkinson J. Why deliberate? The encounter between deliberation and new public managers. Public Administration 82 2 (2004) 377-395
47. Petticrew M. Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: Myths and misconceptions. British Medical Journal 322 7278 (2001) 98-201
48. Philips Z., et al. Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytical modelling in health technology assessment (report). Health Technology Assessment 8 36 (2004)
49. Prior L. Belief, knowledge and expertise: The emergence of the lay expert in medical sociology. Sociology of Health and Illness 25 3 (2003) 41-57
50. Quennell P. Getting a word in edgeways? Patient group participation in the appraisal process in the National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Clinical Governance 8 1 (2003) 39-45
51. Rawls J. A theory of justice (revised edition) (1999), Oxford University Press, Oxford
52. Rawls J. The idea of public reason. In: Bohman J., and Rehg W. (Eds). Deliberative democracy: Essays on reasoning and politics (1997), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA [1993, 1996]
53. Salter B. The new politics of medicine (2004), Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke
54. Secretary of State for Wales. NHS Wales: Putting patients first, Cm 3841 (1998), Stationary Office, London
55. Skelcher C. Involvement and empowerment in local public services. Public Money and Management 18 3 (1993) 13-20
56. Skelcher C., Mathur N., and Smith M. The public governance of collaborative spaces: Discourse, design and democracy. Public Administration 83 3 (2005) 573-596
57. Stokes S. Pathologies of deliberation. In: Elster J. (Ed). Deliberative democracy (1998), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
58. Stokkom B.v. Deliberative group dynamics: Power, status and affect in interactive policy making. Policy and Politics 33 3 (2005) 387-409
59. Syrett K. A technocratic fix to the "legitimacy problem"? The Blair government and health care rationing in the United Kingdom. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 28 4 (2003) 715-746
60. Timmermans S., and Berg M. The gold standard: The challenge of evidence-based medicine and standardization in healthcare (2003), Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA
61. Walzer M. Spheres of justice: A defence of pluralism and equality (1983), Blackwell, Oxford
62. Walt G. Health policy: An introduction to process and power (1994), Zed Books, London
63. Webster C. The health service since the war, volume I: Problems of health care: The National Health Service before 1957 (1988), HMSO, London