Prospective teachers' opinions on the value of PowerPoint presentations in lecturing

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 2051-2059

  Uz, Çiǧdem ^a   Orhan, Feza ^a   Bilgiç, Gülşah ^a  

^a YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

lecturing; PowerPoint presentations; prospective teachers

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957712123     PISSN: 18770428     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.280     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Akdaǧ, M.; Tok, H. (2004). Geleneksel Öǧretim ile PowerPoint Sunum Destekli Öǧretimin Öǧrenci Erişisine Etkisi. Ulusal Eǧitim Bilimleri Kurultayi(13).
2. Apperson, J.M.;Laws, E.L.;Scepansky,J.A(2008). An assessment of student preferences for PowerPoint presentation structure in undergraduate courses.Computers&Education(50),148-153.
3. Bartsch,R.A.;Cobern,K.M. (2003).Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in lectures. Computers&Education,41,77-86.
4. Farkas, D.K. (2006). A Heuristic for Reasoning about PowerPoint Deck Design. Proceedings of the 2008 International Professional Communication Conference, Montreal, Canada, July 13-16.
5. Frey, B.A.;Birnbaum,D.J. (2002).Learners' perceptions on the value of PowerPoint in lectures. Pittsburgh:University of Pittsburg (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED467192).
6. Holzl, J. (1997). Twelve tips for effective PowerPoint presentations for the technologically challenged. Medical Teacher, 19(3), 175-179.
7. Matveyev, A.; Zhuravlyov,V.A.(2001).Higher Education and Information Technology: The Russian Federation State Policy.Educational Research and Development,45(4),97-107.
8. Mayer, M.E.(1997).Multimedia Learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist,32(1),1-19.
9. Moreno, R.;Mayer R.A. (1998) Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning: Implications of Design Principles. ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors İn Computing Systems; Los Angeles, CA.
10. Perry,T.; Perry,L.A(1998). University students' attitudes towards multimedia presentations.British Journal of Educational Technology,29,375-377.
11. Reiser, R.A. (2001). A History of Instructional Design and Technology: Part I: A History of Instructional Media. Educational Technology Research and Development , 49 (1), 53-64.
12. Rickman,J.;Grudzinzki,M.(2000).Student expectations of information technology use in the classroom.Educause Quaterly,1,24-30.
13. Rocklin, T.(1997). PowerPoint is not evil.The National Teaching and Learning Forum 6, http://www.ntfl.com/html/sf/notevil.html web site has been reached.
14. Rosenthal, G.T; Soper, B.;Mcknight, R.; Barr,J.; Wilkinsin,J.; Bergen,C.W. (2003). Multimedia. It's how you use it.Computers in the School,26,77-86.
15. Savoy,A.; Proctor, R. W.; Salvendy,G. (2009). Information retention from PowerPoint™ and traditional lectures Computers& Education, 52 (4), 858-86.
16. Seaman, M. A. (1998). Developing visual displays for lecture-based courses. Teaching of Psychology, 25, 141-145.
17. Susskind, J.E.(2005).PowerPoints power in the classroom: Enhancing students' self-efficacy and attitudes. Computers and Education, 45(2).203-215.
18. Susskind, J.E.(2008). Limits of PowerPoints' Power:Enhancing Students'self-efficacy and attitudes but not their behavior. Computers&Education(50),1228-1239.
19. Szabo, A.; Hastings,N.(2000).Using IT in the undergraduate classroom: Should we replace the blackboard with PowerPoint?. Computers&Education,35, 175-187.
20. Yalin, H.İ. (2003).Öǧretim Teknolojileri ve Materyal Geliştirme. Ankara; Nobel Yayincilik.