Are creative students really welcome in the classrooms? Implicit theories of "good" and "creative" student' personality among polish teachers

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 1233-1237

  Karwowski, Maciej ^a  

^a THE MARIA GRZEGORZEWSKA UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Creativity; implicit theories; Poland

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957707354     PISSN: 18770428     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.179     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. Chan, D. W., Chan, L. (1999. Implicit theories of creativity: teachers' perception of students characteristics in Hong-Kong. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 185-195.
2. Karwowski, M. (2007). Teachers' nominations of students' creativity: Should we believe them? Are the nominations valid? The Social Sciences, 2, 264-269.
3. Ng, A. K., Smith, I. (2004). The paradox of promoting creativity in the asian classroom: an empirical investigation. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 130, 307-330.
4. Reiter-Palmon, Illies, J. J., & Kobe-Cross, L. M. (2009). Conscientiousness is not always a good predictor of performance: the case of creativity. International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 19, 27-45.
5. Runco, M. A., Johnson, D. J. (1993). Parents' and teachers' implicit theories of children's creativity. Child Study Journal, 23, 91-113.
6. Szarota, P. (1995). Polska Lista Przymiotnikowa (PLP): Narzȩdzie do diagnozy piȩciu wielkich czynników osobowoşci. Studia Psychologiczne, 33, 227-255.
7. Westby, E. L., Dawson, V. L. (1995). Creativity: asset or burden in the classroom? Creativity Research Journal, 8, 1-10.
8. Wiechnik, R. (2000). Obraz ucznia idealnego w percepcji nauczycieli szkół podstawowych. Psychologia Rozwojowa, 3-4, 255-267.