Implementation of Task-based approaches to language teaching

Pazhuhesh-e Zabanha-ye Khareji

Volumn , Issue 41, 2008, Pages 45-61

  Rahimpour, Massoud ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TABRIZ   (Iran)

Author keywords

Curriculum; Schools of Syllabus Design; Structure Based Teaching Learning; Syllabus Design; Task based Language Teaching Learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957704295     PISSN: 25884131     EISSN: 25887092     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Breen, M. (1984). Process syllabus for the language classroom. In C. J. Brumfit (Ed.), General English syllabus design ELT Document, 118, Oxford: Pergamon Press, 47-60
2. Breen, M. (1987). Learner contributions to task design. In C. Candlin & D. Murphy (Eds.). Language learning tasks. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-Hall, 23-46
3. Breen, M. P. & Candlin, C., (1980). The essentials of communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1, 89-112
4. Brumfit, G.J. (1984). General English syllabus design. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
5. Candlin, C. N. (1984). Syllabus design as a critical process, ELT Documents, No. 118, London: Pergamon & The British Council, 29-46
6. Candlin, C. N. (1987). Towards task-based language learning. In Candlin, C. & Murphy, D.(Eds.), Lancaster Practical Paper in English Language Education. Vol., Language Learning Tasks (pp.5-22). Englewood Cliff. NJ.: Prentice Hall.
7. Candlin, C.&. Murphy, D (1987). Language learning tasks. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
8. Crookes, G. (1986). Task classification: A cross-disciplinary review. (Tech.Rep. No.4). Honolulu: University of Hawaii at Manoa, Social Research Institute, Center for Second Language Classroom Research.
9. Crookes, G. & Gass. S. (1993). Task in a pedagogic context: Integrating theory and practice. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
10. Crookes, G. & Long, M. (1987). Task-based second language teaching: A brief report. Modern English Teacher (Tokyo), 24,(5) 26-8, and (6), 20-23
11. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Krahnke, K. (1987). Approaches to syllabus design for foreign language learning. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
13. Lennon, P., (1990). Investigating fluency: a quantitative approach. Language Learning, 40 (3), 387-417
14. Long, M., (1991). Measuring classroom language change. Unpublished paper, Honolulu: Department of ESL, University of Hawai'i at Manoa.
15. Long, M. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In Hyltestan, K. & Pienemann, M.(Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters, 77-99
16. Long, M. (1989). Task, group, and task-based interactions. University of Hawaii Working Papers in ESL, 8(2), 1-26
17. Long, M. & Crookes, G. (1987). Intervention points in second language classroom, In Das, B. (Ed.), Patterns in classroom introduction in South Asia. Singapore: Singapore University Press/RELC, 177-203
18. Long, M. & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 27-56
19. Long, M. & Crookes, G. (1993). Units of analysis in syllabus. The case for task. In Crookes, G. & Gass, S. (Eds.), Tasks in pedagogic context: Integrating theory and practice. Clevedon Avon: Multilingual Matters Ltd, 9-54
20. Nation, P. (1989). Improving speaking fluency. System, 17 (3), 377-384
21. Nunan. D. (1993). Syllabus design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Pica, T. Kanagy, R. & Falodun, L. (1993). Choosing and using communicative tasks for second language instruction and research. In Crookes, G. Gass, S. (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice. Clevedon Avon: Multilingual Matters Ltd, 9-34
23. Pienemann, M. (1985). Learnability and syllabus construction. In Hyltenstam & Pienemann (Eds.), Modeling and assessing second language acquisition, Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters, 23-75
24. Prabhu, N. (1984). Procedural syllabus. In Read, T. (Ed.), Trends in language syllabus design. Singapore: Singapore University Press, 272-280
25. Prabhu, N. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Rahimpour, M. (1995a). Interlanguage variation and task performance. Paper presented at SLARF '95 Conference at Cornell University, Ithaca, New York. 29th September-1st October.
27. Rahimpour, M. (1995b) Interlanguage Performance and ask performance: An analysis of accuracy, complexity and fluency of second language speech production. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of ALAA, Australian National University, Canberra, 26-29. September.
28. Rahimpour, M. (1997). Task complexity, task condition and variation in L2 oral discourse. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. The University of Queensland, Brisbane. Australia.
29. Rahimpour, M. (1999). Task complexity and variation in interlanguage. In N. Jungheim & P. Robinson (Eds.), Pragmatics and pedagogy: Proceedings of The 3rd Pacific Second Language Research Forum, Vol 2, Tokyo:PacSLRF, 115-134
30. Rahimpour, M. (2001a) The role of classroom teacher in syllabus design. Paper presented at TDTR 5th international conference 9-11 Sept. 2001 Middle East Technical University of Ankara, Turkey.
31. Rahimpour, M. (2001b). The Acquisition of L2 in instructed & naturalistic settings. Journal of the Faculty of Letters & Humanities. Tabriz University. 1-2, 9-33
32. Rahimpour, M. (2002c). Factors affecting task difficulty. Journal of Faculty of Letters & Humanities. Teachers Training University Tehran. 9, 1-16
33. Rahimpour, M. (2002d) Task-based syllabi. Paper presented at AILA Conference 16-21 December, 2000. Singapore.
34. Rahimpour, M. (2005). The impact of task types on L2 learners' performance. Paper presented at 13th World Conference of applied linguistics. University of Wisconsin. U.S.A.24-29, July.
35. Robinson P. (1995). Task complexity and second language narrative discourse. Language Learning, 45, 1-42
36. Robinson P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27-57
37. Robinson P. (1996). Rahimpour, M. & Urwin, J., Taxonomizing second language task complexity. Paper presented at PacSLARF '96 Conference, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. 30th Jan-2nd Feb.
38. Skehan, P., (2003). Task-based instruction. Language Teaching. 36, 1-14
39. Stern, H.H., (1984). Review and discussion. In C. J. Brumfit.(Ed.). General English syllabus design. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
40. White, R. (1988). The ELT curriculum. Design, innovation and management. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
41. White, R. & Robinson, P. (1995). Current approaches to syllabus design: a discussion with Ron White. Guidelines, 17 (1), 93-101
42. Wilkins, D. (1974). Notional syllabuses and the concept of minimum adequate grammar. In Corder, S.P. & E. Roulet (eds.), Linguistic insights in applied linguistics. Brussels: AIMAV: Didier, 119-128
43. Wilkins, D. (1976). Notional syllabuses. London: Oxford University Press.