Reliability and validity study of the technology proficiency self-assessment scale

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 2863-2867

  Gençtürk, Ebru ^a   Gökçek, Tuba ^a   Güneş, Gönül ^a  

^a KARADENIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

primary teacher; relability; Technology self efficacy; validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957703255     PISSN: 18770428     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.429     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Albion, P. R. (1999). Self-efficacy beliefs as an indicator of teachers' preparedness for teaching with technology. Technology and Teacher Education Annual (Society for Information Technology&Teacher Education). Retrieved September 27, 2009 from http://www.usq.edu.au/users/albion/papers/site99/1345. html
2. Ataünal, A. (2003). Niçin ve Nasil Bir Öǧretmen. Ankara: Milli Eǧitim Vakfi Yayinlari. No:4.
3. Bandura, A., (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward A Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review. 84 (2), 191-215.
4. Bandura, A., (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi Elkitabi, PegemAYayincilik, Ankara.
6. Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2001). Equity and diversity in K-12 applications of information technology (Key instructional design strategies: KIDS project findings for 2000-2001). Denton, TX: University of North Texas, Institute for the Integration of Technology into Teaching and Learning.
7. Collins, A. (1996). The Role of Computer Technology in Restructing Schools, Retrieved September 2, 2006 from http://www.edc.org/CCT/ccthome/ reports/tr9.html
8. Devlet Planlama Teşkilati (Prime Ministry State Planning Organization) (2006). Bilgi Toplumu Stratejisi 2006-2010. Retrieved from www.bilgitoplumu.gov.tr (01.09.2008)
9. Dusick, D. M. (1998). What social cognitive factors influence faculty members' use of computers for teaching? A literature review. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31 (2). Retrieved November 2, 2002 from EBSCOHost.
10. Haddad, W. D. & Jurich, S. (2002). ICT for Education: Prerequisites and Constraints. In Haddad, W. D. and Draxler, A. (Eds.). Technologies for Education: Potentials, Parameters, and Prospects. Paris & Washington: UNESCO & Academy for Educational Development, 28-41.
11. ISTE. (2000). National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers. Retrieved October, 10, 2009 from http://www.iste.org/ Content/NavigationMenu/NETS/ForTeachers/2008Standards/NETS-T-Standards-Final.pdf
12. Kline, P. (1994). An Easy Guide To Factor Analysis. London: Routledge.
13. Marcinkiewicz, H. R. (1994). Computers and teachers: Factors affecting computer use in the classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26 (2), 220-237.
14. Morales, C., Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2008). Self-Efficacy Ratings of Technology Proficiency Among Teachers in Mexico and Texas, Computers in the Schools, 25 (1), 126-144.
15. Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS Survival Manual. A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows Philadelphia. Open University Press.
16. Ropp, M. (1999). Exploring individual characteristics associated with learning to use computers in preservice teacher preparation. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(4), 402-424.
17. Swan, K., & Mitrani, M. (1993). The changing nature of teaching and learning in computer-based classrooms. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26 (1), 40+ Retrieved April 10, 2002 from EBSCO Host.
18. Tuckman, B. W. and Sexton, T. L. (1990). The Relationship Between Self- Beliefs And Self- Regulated Performance.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 465-472.