Patch-testing with plastics and glues series allergens

Dermatitis

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 269-274

  Shmidt, Eugenia ^a   Farmer, Sara A ^a   Davis, Mark D P ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

2 HYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE; ACRYLIC ACID 2 HYDROXYETHYL ESTER; ALLERGEN; BENZOYL PEROXIDE; BIS(2 DIMETHYLAMINOETHYL)ETHER; BISPHENOL F; EPOXY RESIN; GLUE; PLASTIC; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; AGED; ALLERGIC REACTION; ALLERGY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATCH TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SKIN IRRITATION; SKIN MANIFESTATION; SKIN TEST;

ADHESIVES; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALLERGENS; CHILD; DERMATITIS, CONTACT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATCH TESTS; PLASTICS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957671667     PISSN: 17103568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2310/6620.2010.10024     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Davis MD, Scalf LA, Yiannias JA, et al. Changing trends and allergens in the patch test standard series: a Mayo Clinic 5-year retrospective review, January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2005. Arch Dermatol 2008;144:67-72.
2. Bjorkner B, Niklasson B, Persson K. The sensitizing potential of di- (meth)acrylates based on bisphenol A or epoxy resin in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 1984;10:286-304.
3. Dutree-Meulenberg RO, Kozel MM, van Joost T. Burning mouth syndrome: a possible etiologic role for local contact hypersensitivity. J Am Acad Dermatol 1992;26:935-40.
4. Erikstam U, Bruze M, Goossens A. Degradation of triglycidyl isocyanurate as a cause of false-negative patch test reaction. Contact Dermatitis 2001;44:13-7.
5. Estlander T, Kostiainen M, Jolanki R, Kanerva L. Active sensitization and occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by paratertiary-butylcatechol. Contact Dermatitis 1998;38:96-100. (Pubitemid 28065986)
6. Foussereau J, Herve-Bazin B, Meynadier J, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis to plastic table cloth and phenyl indole. Contact Dermatitis 1982;8:73.
7. Geier J, Lessmann H, Hillen U, et al. An attempt to improve diagnostics of contact allergy due to epoxy resin systems: first results of the multicentre study EPOX 2002. Contact Dermatitis 2004;51: 263-72.
8. Holness DL, Nethercott JR. Results of patch testing with a specialized collection of plastic and glue allergens. Am J Contact Dermat 1997;8:121-4.
9. Kanerva L, Jolanki R, Alanko K, Estlander T. Patch-test reactions to plastic and glue allergens. Acta Derm Venereol 1999;79:296-300.
10. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R. Allergic contact dermatitis from dental composite resins due to aromatic epoxy acrylates and aliphatic acrylates. Contact Dermatitis 1989;20:201-11.
11. Tarvainen K. Analysis of patients with allergic patch test reactions to a plastics and glues series. Contact Dermatitis 1995;32:346-51.
12. Tosti A, Bardazzi F, Valeri F, Russo R. Contact dermatitis from butylated hydroxyanisole. Contact Dermatitis 1987;17:257-8.
13. Turner TW. Dermatitis from butylated hydroxy anisole. Contact Dermatitis 1977;3:282.
14. White IR, Lovell CR, Cronin E. Antioxidants in cosmetics. Contact Dermatitis 1984;11:265-7.
15. Ballantyne B, Depass LR, Fowler EH, et al. Dermatotoxicology of BIS[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl) ether. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 1986;5: 3-33.