Device for improving quantification of reading acuity and reading speed

Journal of Refractive Surgery

Volumn 26, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 682-688

  Dexl, Alois K ^a   Schlögel, Horst ^a   Wolfbauer, Michael ^a   Grabner, Günther ^a  

^a PARACELSUS MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HUMAN; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PRESBYOPIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; READING DISTANCE; READING SPEED; RELIABILITY; SALZBURG READING DESK DEVICE; VALIDATION PROCESS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; INSTRUMENTATION; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PRESBYOPIA; READING; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 77957656770     PISSN: 1081597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20091119-01     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Radner W, Obermayer W, Richter-Müksch S, Willinger U, Velikay-Parel M, Eisenwort B. The validity and reliability of short German sentences for measuring reading speed. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002;240(6):461-467.
2. Uusitalo RJ, Brans T, Pessi T, Tarkkanen A. Evaluating cataract surgery gains by assessing patients' quality of life using the VF-7. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25(7):989-994.
3. Mönestam E, Wachtmeister L. The impact of cataract surgery on low vision patients. A population based study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1997;75(5):569-576.
4. Anschütz T. Laser correction of hyperopia and presbyopia. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1994;34(4):107-137.
5. Bauerberg JM. Centered vs. inferior off-center ablation to correct hyperopia and presbyopia. J Refract Surg. 1999;15(1):66-69.
6. Fernandez-Suntay JP, Pineda R II, Azar DT. Conductive keratoplasty. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2004;44(1):161-168.
7. McDonald MB, Hersh PS, Manche EE, Maloney RK, Davidorf J, Sabry M; Conductive Keratoplasty United States Investigators Group. Conductive keratoplasty for the correction of low to moderate hyperopia: U.S. clinical trial 1-year results on 355 eyes. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(11):1978-1989.
8. Schachar RA. Cause and treatment of presbyopia with a method for increasing the amplitude of accommodation. Ann Ophthalmol. 1992;24(12):445-447, 452.
9. Qazi MA, Pepose JS, Shuster JJ. Implantation of scleral expansion band segments for the treatment of presbyopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134(6):808-815.
10. Fukasaku H, Marron JA. Anterior ciliary sclerotomy with silicone expansion plug implantation: effect on presbyopia and intraocular pressure. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2001;41(2):133-141.
11. Baïkoff G, Matach G, Fontaine A, Ferraz C, Spera C. Correction of presbyopia with refractive multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(7):1454-1460.
12. Holladay JT, van Dijk H, Lang A, Portney V, Willis TR, Sun R, Oksman HC. Optical performance of multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990;16(4):413-422.
13. Gimbel HV, Sanders DR, Raanan MG. Visual and refractive results of multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(6):881-888.
14. Langenbucher A, Seitz B, Huber S, Nguyen NX, Küchle M. Theoretical and measured pseudophakic accommodation after the implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121(12):1722-1727. (Pubitemid 37517439)
15. Cumming JS, Slade SG, Chayet A; AT-45 Study Group. Clinical evaluation of the model AT-45 silicone accommodating intraocular lens: results of feasibility and the initial phase of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(11):2005-2009.
16. Findl O, Kriechbaum K, Menapace R, Koeppl C, Sacu S, Wirtitsch M, Buehl W, Drexler W. Laserinterferometric assessment of pilocarpine-induced movement of an accommodating intraocular lens: a randomized trial. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(8):1515-1521.
17. Küchle M, Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Gusek-Schneider GC, Martus P, Nguyen NX; Erlangen Accomodative Intraocular Lens Study Group. Comparison of 6-month results of implantation of the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens with conventional intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(2):318-324.
18. Waring GO III. Presbyopia and accommodative intraocular lenses - the next frontier in refractive surgery? Refract Corneal Surg. 1992;8(6):421-423.
19. Bach M, Kommerell G. Determining visual acuity using European normal values: scientific principles and possibilities for automatic measurement [German]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1998;212(4):190-195.
20. Ophthalmic optics. Visual acuity testing. Standard optotype and its presentation (ISO 8596:1994). Berlin, Germany: Beuth-Verlag; 1994.
21. Colenbrander A. Visual acuity measurement standard. Ital J Ophthalmol. 1988;II/I:5-19.
22. Visual acuity test. Part 3, 5 and 6. DIN 58220. Berlin, Germany: Beuth-Verlag; 1997.
23. Bailey IL, Lovie JE. The design and use of a new near-vision chart. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1980;57(6):378-387.
24. Radner W, Willinger U, Obermayer W, Mudrich C, Velikay- Parel M, Eisenwort B. A new reading chart for simultaneous determination of reading vision and speed [German]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1998;213(3):174-181.
25. Recommended standard procedures for the clinical measurement and specification of visual acuity. Report of working group 39. Committee on Vision. Assembly of Behavioral and Social Sciences, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. Adv Ophthalmol. 1980;41:103-148.
26. Ferris FL III, Kassoff A, Bresnick GH, Bailey I. New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;94(1):91-96.
27. Stifter E, König F, Lang T, Bauer P, Richter-Müksch S, Velikay- Parel M, Radner W. Reliability of a standardized reading chart system: variance component analysis, test-retest and inter-chart reliability. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;242(1):31-39.
28. Richter-Mueksch S, Weghaupt H, Skorpik C, Velikay-Parel M, Radner W. Reading performance with a refractive multifocal and a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28(11):1957-1963.
29. Ergun E, Maár N, Radner W, Barbazetto I, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Stur M. Scotoma size and reading speed in patients with subfoveal occult choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(1):65-69.
30. Light and lighting. Lighting of work places. Part 1: indoor work places (German version). DIN EN 12464-1:2003 03. Berlin, Germany: Beuth-Verlag; 2003.
31. Rubin GS, West SK, Muñoz B, Bandeen-Roche K, Zeger S, Schein D, Fried LP. A comprehensive assessment of visual impairment in a population of older Americans. The SEE Study. Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38(3):557-568.
32. Whittaker SG, Lovie-Kitchin J. Visual requirements for reading. Optom Vis Sci. 1993;70(1):54-65.
33. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307-310.
34. Bühren J, Terzi E, Bach M, Wesemann W, Kohnen T. Measuring contrast sensitivity under different lighting conditions: comparison of three tests. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83(5):290-298.
35. Holladay JT. Understanding neural adaptation. In: Quality of Vision: Essential Optics for the Refractive Surgeon. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated; 2007:115-122.