An experimental paradigm to compare motor performance under laboratory and under everyday-like conditions

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Volumn 193, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 24-28

  Bock, Otmar ^a   Hagemann, Anne ^a  

^a GERMAN SPORT UNIVERSITY COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Attention; Context dependence; Grasping; Motivation; Motor control; Prehension

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LABORATORY; MALE; MENTAL TASK; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MOTIVATION; MOTOR SKILLS; MOVEMENT;

EID: 77957655028     PISSN: 01650270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Allport A., Styles E., Hsieh S. Shifting intentional set: exploring the dynamic control of tasks 1994, vol. XV:421-452. Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
2. Creem S., Proffitt D. Grasping objects by their handles: a necessary interaction between cognition and action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2001, 27:18-28.
3. Daprati E., Sirigu A. How we interact with objects: learning from brain lesions. Trends Cogn Sci 2006, 10:265-270.
4. Dubrowski A., Bock O., Carnahan H., Jüngling S. The coordination of hand transport and grasp formation during single- and double-perturbed human prehension movements. Exp Brain Res 2002, 145:365-371.
5. Eversheim U., Bock O. The role of precues in the preparation of motor responses in humans. J Motor Behav 2002, 34:271-276.
6. Fitts P.M. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 1954, 47:381-391.
7. Girgenrath M., Bock O., Jüngling S. Validity of the speed-accuracy tradeoff for prehension movements. Exp Brain Res 2004, 158:415-420.
8. Henry F., Rogers D. Increased response latency for complicated movements and a " memory drum" theory of neuromotor reaction. Res Q 1960, 31:448-458.
9. Hermsdörfer J., Marquardt C., Philipp J., Zierdt A., Nowak D., Glasauer S., et al. Moving weightless objects. Grip force control during microgravity. Exp Brain Res 2000, 132:52-64.
10. Hsieh C., Nelson D., Smith D., Peterson C. A comparison of performance in added-purpose occupations and rote exercise for dynamic standing balance in persons with hemiplegia. Am J Occup Ther 1996, 50:10-16.
11. Hyman R. Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. J Exp Psychol 1953, 45:188-196.
12. Ingram J.N., Kording K.P., Howard I.S., Wolpert D.M. The statistics of natural hand movements. Exp Brain Res 2008, 188:223-236.
13. Jeannerod M. Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects 1981, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
14. Johansson R.S., Westling G. Roles of glaborous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects. Exp Brain Res 1984, 56:550-564.
15. Kleinsorge T. The time course of effort mobilization and strategic adjustments of response criteria. Psychol Res 2001, 65:216-223.
16. McCarley J., Kramer A., DiGirolamo G. Differential effects of the Müller-Lyer illusion on reflexive and voluntary saccades. J Vis 2003, 3:751-760.
17. Palmera J., Hiiemaed K., Matsuoa K., Haishimae H. Volitional control of food transport and bolus formation during feeding. Physiol Behav 2007, 91:66-70.
18. Passingham R. Attention to action. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1996, 351:1473-1479.
19. Posner M. Orientating of attention. Q J Exp Psychol 1980, 32:3-25.
20. Sarvia M., Bush J., Mourino A. Psychomotor skills and incentive as predictors in a children's toothbrushing program. J Pedod 1989, 14:31-35.
21. Stuss D., Shallice T., Alexander M., Picton T. A multidisciplinary approach to anterior attentional functions. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1995, 769:191-211.
22. Symes E., Ellis R., Tucker M. Visual object affordances: object orientation. Acta Psychol 2007, 124:238-255.
23. Waszak F., Wascher E., Keller P., Koch I., Aschersleben G., Rosenbaum D., et al. Intention-based and stimulus-based mechanism in action selection. Exp Brain Res 2005, 162:346-356.