The influence of dominant logic on dynamic capability: A theoretical investigation

International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 37-48

  Cernas Ortiz, Daniel A ^a   D'Souza, Derrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Dominant Logic; Dynamic Capabilities Change

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957585575     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14479524     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.18848/1447-9524/CGP/v10i02/49926     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Amburgey, T., & Dacin, T. 1994. As the left foot follows the right? The dynamics of strategic and structural change. Academy of Management Journal, 37 (6): 1427-1452.
2. Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1): 128-152.
3. Collins, D. 1994. How valuable are organizational capabilities? Strategic Management Journal, 15 (winter, special issue): 143-152.
4. Cote, L., Langley, A., & Pasquero, J. 1999. Acquisition strategy and dominant logic in an engineering firm. Journal of Management Studies, 36 (7): 919-952.
5. Dixon, S. E. A., & Day, M. 2007. Leadership, administrative heritage and absorptive capacity. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 28 (8): 727-748.
6. Doving, E., & Gooderham, P. 2008. Dynamic capabilities as antecedents of the scope of related diversification: The case of small firm accountancy practices. Strategic Management Journal, 29 (8): 841-857.
7. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21 (10): 1105-1121.
8. Ginsberg, A. 1990. Connecting diversification to performance: A sociocognitive approach. Academy of Management Review, 15 (3): 514-535.
9. Grant, R. 1988. On 'Dominant logic', Relatedness and the link between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 9 (6): 639-642.
10. Hambrick, D. 2007. Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32 (2): 334-343.
11. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9 (2): 193-206.
12. Hannan, M., & Freeman, J. 1977. The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82 (5): 929-964.
13. Helfat, C. E. 2000. Guest editor's introduction to the special issue: The evolution of firm capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (10): 955-959.
14. Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M. A., Singh, H., Teece, D. J., & Winter, S. G. 2007. Dynamic Capabilities, Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. Blackwell Publishing.
15. Helfat, C. E., & Lieberman, M. 2002. The birth of capabilities: Market entry and the importance of pre-history. Industrial and corporate change, 11 (4): 725-760.
16. Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. 2003. The dynamic resource-based view: Capability cycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (10): 997-1010.
17. Holbrook, D., Cohen, W., Hounshell, D., & Klepper, S. 2000. The nature, sources, and consequences, of firm differences in the early history of the semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (10): 1017-1041.
18. Lampel, J., & Shamsie, J. 2000. Probing the unobtrusive link: Dominant logic and the design of joint ventures at General Electric. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (5): 593-602.
19. Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (winter, special issue): 95-112.
20. Lubatkin, M., & Lane, P. 1996. Psst The merger mavens still have it wrong! Academy of Management Executive, 10 (1): 21-37.
21. Lyles, M. A., & Schwenk, C. R. 1992. Top management, strategy and organizational knowledge structures. Journal of Management Studies, 29 (2):155-173
22. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. 1958. Cognitive limits on rationality. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
23. Miller, D. 1993. The architecture of simplicity. Academy of Management Journal, 18 (1): 116-138.
24. Michael, S. C. 2001. Entrepreneurship as strategy: Competing in the entrepreneurial edge. The Academy of Management Review, 26 (1): 133-135.
25. Nelson, R., & Winter, S. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
26. O'Reilly III, C., & Tushman, M. L. 2007. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovators dilemma. Working paper.
27. Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive strategy, Free Press, New York.
28. Prahalad, C. K., & Bettis, R. A. 1986. The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7 (6): 485-502.
29. Prahalad, C. K., & Bettis, R. A. 1995. The dominant logic: Retrospective and extension. Strategic Management Journal, 16 (1): 5-14.
30. Prahalad, C. K. 2004. The blinders of dominant logic. Long Range Planning, 37 (2): 171-179.
31. Rindova V., & Kotha, S. (2001). Continuous morphing: Competing through dynamic capabilities, form and function. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (6): 1263-1280.
32. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7): 509-533.
33. Tripsas, M., & Gavetti, G. 2000. Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imagining. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (10): 1147-1161.
34. Von Krogh, G., & Roos, J. 1996. A tale of the unfinished. Strategic Management Journal. 17 (9): 729- 737.
35. Walsh, J. P. 1995. Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science, 6 (3): 280-320.
36. Walters, B., Priem, R., & Shook, C. 2005. Small business manager scanning emphases and the dominant logic of the business-level strategy. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 15 (2): 19-32.
37. Winter, S. 2003. Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (10): 991-995.
38. Zahra, S., & George, G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27 (2): 185-203.
39. Zollo, M., & Winter, S. 2002. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13 (3): 339-350.