Accuracy of 3 T MR angioraphy in vertebral artery stenosis and coincidence with other cerebrovascular stenoses

Neuroradiology

Volumn 52, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 893-898

  Choi, Hyun Seok ^a   Kim, Dong Ik ^a   Kim, Dong Joon ^a   Kim, Jinna ^a   Kim, Eun Soo ^a   Lee, Seung Koo ^a  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Atherosclerosis; Intracranial stenosis; MR angiography; Vertebral artery stenosis

Indexed keywords

GADOBUTROL; IOHEXOL;

ADULT; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTERY LESION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY OCCLUSION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OCCLUSIVE CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME OF FLIGHT MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; VERTEBRAL ARTERY STENOSIS; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; VERTEBROBASILAR INSUFFICIENCY;

CEREBROVASCULAR DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VERTEBROBASILAR INSUFFICIENCY;

EID: 77957576454     PISSN: 00283940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-010-0655-z     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. B Randoux B Marro F Koskas, et al. 2001 Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of ct, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced mr, and conventional angiography Radiology 220 179 185 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzmsVyjsA%3D%3D 11425993
2. PC Sundgren P Sunden A Lindgren J Lanke S Holtas EM Larsson 2002 Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced mr angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography Neuroradiology 44 592 599 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38zoslOhsg%3D%3D 10.1007/s00234-002-0789-8 12136361 (Pubitemid 36067851)
3. J Alvarez-Linera J Benito-Leon J Escribano J Campollo R Gesto 2003 Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced mr angiography and spiral ct angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24 1012 1019 12748115
4. BY Huang M Castillo 2009 Neurovascular imaging at 1.5 tesla versus 3.0 tesla Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 17 29 + 10.1016/j.mric.2008.12.005 19364598
5. R Habibi MM Lell R Steiner, et al. 2009 High-resolution 3t mr angiography of the carotid arteries: comparison of manual and semiautomated quantification of stenosis Am J Neuroradiol 30 46 52 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M%2FmsFartg%3D%3D 10.3174/ajnr.A1302 18842763
6. M Anzidei A Napoli BC Marincola, et al. 2009 Gadofosveset-enhanced mr angiography of carotid arteries: does steady-state imaging improve accuracy of first-pass imaging? Comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography Radiology 251 457 466 10.1148/radiol.2512081197 19401574
7. S Khan GC Cloud S Kerry HS Markus 2007 Imaging of vertebral artery stenosis: a systematic review J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 78 1218 1225 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2snhsVOitQ%3D%3D 10.1136/jnnp.2006.111716 17287234 (Pubitemid 350057286)
8. KU Wentz J Rother A Schwartz HP Mattle R Suchalla RR Edelman 1994 Intracranial vertebrobasilar system: mr angiography Radiology 190 105 110 1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2Fot1Wmsg%3D%3D 8259384
9. L Remonda O Heid G Schroth 1998 Carotid artery stenosis, occlusion, and pseudo-occlusion: first-pass, gadolinium-enhanced, three-dimensional mr angiography-preliminary study Radiology 209 95 102 1:STN:280: DyaK1cvktF2mtg%3D%3D 9769818
10. B Randoux B Marro F Koskas J Chiras D Dormont C Marsault 2003 Proximal great vessels of aortic arch: comparison of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced mr angiography and digital subtraction angiography Radiology 229 697 702 10.1148/radiol.2292011648 14563902 (Pubitemid 37467571)
11. M Cosottini R Calabrese M Puglioli, et al. 2003 Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional mr angiography of neck vessels: does dephasing effect alter diagnostic accuracy? Eur Radiol 13 571 581 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2Fot12htw%3D%3D 12594561
12. X Leclerc P Martinat O Godefroy, et al. 1998 Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast imaging with steady-state precession (fisp) mr angiography of supraaortic vessels: preliminary results AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 19 1405 1413 1:STN:280:DyaK1cvjsVegsA%3D%3D 9763368
13. G Krinsky M Maya N Rofsky, et al. 1998 Gadolinium-enhanced 3d mra of the aortic arch vessels in the detection of atherosclerotic cerebrovascular occlusive disease J Comput Assist Tomogr 22 167 178 1:STN:280: DyaK1c7ptFCmsQ%3D%3D 10.1097/00004728-199803000-00003 9530375 (Pubitemid 28155185)
14. S Puchner M Haumer T Rand, et al. 2007 Cta in the detection and quantification of vertebral artery pathologies: a correlation with color doppler sonography Neuroradiology 49 645 650 10.1007/s00234-007-0234-0 17453179 (Pubitemid 47163353)
15. S Khan P Rich A Clifton HS Markus 2009 Noninvasive detection of vertebral artery stenosis: a comparison of contrast-enhanced mr angiography, ct angiography, and ultrasound Stroke 40 3499 3503 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.556035 19762707
16. CW Yang JC Carr SF Futterer, et al. 2005 Contrast-enhanced mr angiography of the carotid and vertebrobasilar circulations AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26 2095 2101 16155164
17. RA Taylor F Siddiq MZ Memon, et al. 2009 Vertebral artery ostial stent placement for atherosclerotic stenosis in 72 consecutive patients: clinical outcomes and follow-up results Neuroradiology 51 531 539 10.1007/s00234-009- 0531-x 19437002
18. M Tsutsumi K Kazekawa M Onizuka, et al. 2007 Stent fracture in revascularization for symptomatic ostial vertebral artery stenosis Neuroradiology 49 253 257 10.1007/s00234-006-0185-x 17151868 (Pubitemid 46332320)
19. E Feldmann N Daneault E Kwan, et al. 1990 Chinese-white differences in the distribution of occlusive cerebrovascular disease Neurology 40 1541 1545 1:STN:280:DyaK3M%2FhsFOluw%3D%3D 2215945
20. DC Suh SH Lee KR Kim, et al. 2003 Pattern of atherosclerotic carotid stenosis in korean patients with stroke: different involvement of intracranial versus extracranial vessels AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24 239 244 12591640
21. SH Kim JS Lee OK Kwon MK Han JH Kim 2005 Prevalence study of proximal vertebral artery stenosis using high-resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography Acta Radiol 46 314 321 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MzjtFSisg%3D%3D 10.1080/02841850510016009 15981730 (Pubitemid 41663622)
22. CS Thomas F Habib K Varghese MT Abraham NJ Hayat G Cherian 2003 Disease of proximal part of vertebral artery in patients with coronary artery disease Angiology 54 205 209 10.1177/000331970305400210 12678196
23. PJ Nederkoorn Y van der Graaf BC Eikelboom A van der Lugt LW Bartels WP Mali 2002 Time-of-flight mr angiography of carotid artery stenosis: does a flow void represent severe stenosis? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23 1779 1784 12427639