Development and psychometric evaluation of the Endometriosis Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 899-905

  Deal, Linda S ^a   Williams, Valerie S L ^b   DiBenedetti, Dana Britt ^b   Fehnel, Sheri E ^b  

^a PFIZER INC   (United States)

^b RTI HEALTH SOLUTIONS   (United States)

Author keywords

Endometriosis; Patient reported outcomes; Treatment satisfaction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDIES AS TOPIC; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957566184     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-010-9640-6     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Gao, X., Outley, J., Botteman, M., et al. (2006). Economic burden of endometriosis. Fertility and Sterility, 86, 1561-1572.
2. D'Hooghe, T., & Hummelshoj, L. (2006). Multi-disciplinary centres/networks of excellence for endometriosis management and research: A proposal. Human Reproduction, 21, 2743-2748. (Pubitemid 44566983)
3. Atkinson, M. J., Sinha, A., Hass, S. L., et al. (2004). Validation of a general measure of treatment satisfaction, the treatment satisfaction questionnaire for medication (TSQM), using a national panel study of chronic disease. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2, 12.
4. Weaver, M., Patrick, D. L., Markson, L. E., et al. (1997). Issues in the measurement of satisfaction with treatment. American Journal of Managed Care, 3, 579-594. (Pubitemid 127528785)
5. US Department of Health and Human Services (2009). Guidance for industry: Patient reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/ GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf. Accessed 29 January 2010.
6. Biberoglu, K. O., & Behrman, S. J. (1981). Dosage aspects of danazol therapy in endometriosis: short-term and long-term effectiveness. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 139, 645-654. (Pubitemid 11126195)
7. Jones, G., Kennedy, S., Barnard, A., et al. (2001). Development of an endometriosis quality-of-life instrument: The endometriosis health profile-30. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 98, 258-264. (Pubitemid 32744759)
8. Jones, G. L., Jenkinson, C., & Kennedy, S. (2004). Evaluating the responsiveness of the endometriosis health profile questionnaire: The EHP-30. Quality of Life Research, 13, 705-713. (Pubitemid 38526543)
9. Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 294-334.
10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., et al. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84-99.
12. SAS Institute Inc. (2005). SAS proprietary software, version 9.1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.
13. Streiner, D. L., Norman, G. R. (1995). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.