Using system-wide trust theory to make predictions about dependence on four diagnostic aids

Journal of General Psychology

Volumn 137, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 362-375

  Rice, Stephen ^a   Geels, Kasha ^a  

^a NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

automation; diognostic; system wide; trust

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DEPENDENT PERSONALITY DISORDER; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; SYSTEMS THEORY; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRUST;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUTOMATION; DEPENDENCY (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SYSTEMS THEORY; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TRUST; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957371285     PISSN: 00221309     EISSN: 19400888     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221309.2010.499397     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bainbridge, L. (1983). Ironies of automation. Automatica, 19, 775-779.
2. Dixon, S. R., & Wickens, C. D. (2006). Automation reliability in unmanned aerial vehicle control: A reliance-compliance model of automation dependence in high workload. Human Factors, 48(3), 474-486.
3. Dixon, S. R., Wickens, C. D., & Chang, D. (2005). Mission control of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles: A workload analysis. Human Factors, 47(3), 479-487.
4. Dixon, S. R., Wickens, C. D., & McCarley, J. S. (2007). Onthe independence of compliance and reliance: Are automation false alarms worse the misses? Human Factors, 49(4), 564-572.
5. Green, D. M., & Swets J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
6. Keller, D., & Rice, S. (2009). System-wide versus component-specific trust using multiple aids. Journal of General Psychology.
7. Lee, J. D., & Moray, N. (1994). Trust, self-confidence, and operators' adaptation to automation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40, 153-184.
8. Maltz, M., & Shinar, D. (2003). New alternative methods in analyzing human behavior in cued target acquisition. Human Factors, 45(2), 281-295.
9. Meyer, J. (2001). Effects of warning validity and proximity on responses to warnings. Human Factors, 43, 563-572.
10. Meyer, J. (2004). Conceptual issues in the study of dynamic hazard warnings. Human Factors, 46(2), 196-204.
11. Molloy, R., & Parasuraman, R. (1996). Monitoring an automated system for a single failure: Vigilance and task complexity effects. Human Factors, 38, 311-322.
12. Parasuraman, R., Molloy, R., & Singh, I. L. (1993). Performance consequences of automation-induced "complacency". International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(1), 1-23.
13. Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39, 230-253.
14. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T., & Wickens, D. (2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(3), 286-297.
15. Rice, S. (2009). Examining single and multiple-process theories of trust in automation. Journal of General Psychology, 136(3), 303-319.
16. Rice, S., Hughes, J., McCarley, J. & Keller, D. (2008). Automation dependency and performance gains under time pressure. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
17. Rice, S., & McCarley, J. (2008). The effects of automation bias and saliency on operator trust. Proceedings of the XXIX International Congress of Psychology.
18. Rice, S., Trafimow, D., Clayton, K., & Hunt, G. (2008). Impact of the contrast effect on trust ratings and behavior with automated systems. Cognitive Technology Journal, 13(2), 30-41.
19. Sheridan, T. B. (1987). Handbook of Human Factors. New York: Wiley.
20. Wickens, C. D. (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 3(2), 159-177.
21. Wickens, C. D., & Dixon, S. (2007). The benefits of imperfect diagnostic automation: A synthesis of the literature. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 8, 201-212.
22. Wickens, C. D., & Xu, X. (2002). Automation trust, reliability and attention. (AHFD-02-14/MAAD-02-2). Savoy, IL: University of Illinois, Aviation Research Lab.
23. Wiegmann, D. A., Rich, A., & Zhang, H. (2001). Automated diagnostic aids: The effects of aid reliability on users' trust and reliance. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2(4), 352-367.
24. Wogalter, M. S., & Laughery, K. R. (2006). Warnings and hazard communications. In G. Salvendy (Eds), Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics (pp. 889-911). New York: Wiley.