Improving cellularity and quality of liquid-based cytology slides processed from pancreatobiliary tract brushings

Diagnostic Cytopathology

Volumn 38, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 627-632

  Campion, Michael B ^a   Kipp, Benjamin R ^a   Humphrey, Sandra K ^a   Zhang, Jun ^a   Clayton, Amy C ^a   Henry, Michael R ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Bile duct; Cholangiocarcinoma; CytoLyt; Glacial acetic acid; Pancreatic adenocarcinoma; ThinPrep

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT OBSTRUCTION; BILIARY TRACT CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; EPITHELIUM CELL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PANCREATOBILIARY TRACT CANCER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TISSUE SECTION;

ACETIC ACID; BILIARY TRACT; CYTOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREAS; SPECIMEN HANDLING;

EID: 77957362132     PISSN: 87551039     EISSN: 10970339     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dc.21255     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Govil H, Reddy V, Kluskens L, et al. Brush cytology of the biliary tract: Retrospective study of 278 cases with histopathologic correlation. Diagn Cytopathol 2002;26:273-277. (Pubitemid 34492477)
2. Kipp BR, Stadheim LM, Halling SA, et al. A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:1675-1681. (Pubitemid 39237490)
3. Logrono R, Kurtycz DF, Molina CP, Trivedi VA, Wong JY, Block KP. Analysis of false-negative diagnoses on endoscopic brush cytology of biliary and pancreatic duct strictures: The experience at 2 university hospitals. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000;124:387-392. (Pubitemid 30152140)
4. Weber A, von Weyhern C, Fend F, et al. Endoscopic transpapillary brush cytology and forceps biopsy in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:1097-1101.
5. Volmar KE, Vollmer RT, Routbort MJ, Creager AJ. Pancreatic and bile duct brushing cytology in 1000 cases: Review of findings and comparison of preparation methods. Cancer 2006;108:231-238.
6. Fritcher EG, Brankley SM, Kipp BR, et al. A comparison of conventional cytology, DNA ploidy analysis, and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett's esophagus. Hum Pathol 2008;39:1128-1135.
7. Krishnamurti U, Sasatomi E, Swalsky PA, Finkelstein SD, Ohori NP. Analysis of loss of heterozygosity in atypical and negative bile duct brushing cytology specimens with malignant outcome: Are "false-negative" cytologic findings a representation of morphologically subtle molecular alterations? Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007;131:74-80.
8. Furmanczyk PS, Grieco VS, Agoff SN. Biliary brush cytology and the detection of cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis: Evaluation of specific cytomorphologic features and CA19-9 levels. Am J Clin Pathol 2005;124:355-360.
9. Wight CO, Zaitoun AM, Boulton-Jones JR, Dunkley C, Beckingham IJ, Ryder SD. Improving diagnostic yield of biliary brushings cytology for pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma. Cytopathology 2004;15:87-92.
10. Henke AC, Jensen CS, Cohen MB. Cytologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in biliary and pancreatic duct brushings. Adv Anat Pathol 2002;9:301-308.
11. Moreno Luna LE, Gores GJ. Advances in the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Liver Transpl 2006;12(11,Suppl 2):S15-S19. (Pubitemid 44742518)
12. Biesterfeld S, Deacu L. DNA image cytometry in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions of the bile duct, the pancreatic duct and the papilla of vater. Anticancer Res 2009;29:1579-1584.
13. Krishnamurthy S, Katz RL, Shumate A, et al. DNA image analysis combined with routine cytology improves diagnostic sensitivity of common bile duct brushing. Cancer 2001;93:229-235.
14. Rumalla A, Baron TH, Leontovich O, et al. Improved diagnostic yield of endoscopic biliary brush cytology by digital image analysis. Mayo Clin Proc 2001;76:29-33. (Pubitemid 33778869)
15. Osterheld MC, Andrejevic Blant S, Caron L, et al. Digital image DNA cytometry: A useful tool for the evaluation of malignancy in biliary strictures. Cell Oncol 2005;27:255-260. (Pubitemid 43086480)
16. Lapkus O, Gologan O, Liu Y, et al. Determination of sequential mutation accumulation in pancreas and bile duct brushing cytology. Mod Pathol 2006;19:907-913. (Pubitemid 43910469)
17. Willmore-Payne C, Volmar KE, Huening MA, Holden JA, Layfield LJ. Molecular diagnostic testing as an adjunct to morphologic evaluation of pancreatic ductal system brushings: Potential augmentation for diagnostic sensitivity. Diagn Cytopathol 2007;35:218-224. (Pubitemid 46516676)
18. Caudill J, Kipp B, Block R, Cox S, Knudson T, Keeney G. Biliary brush sample adequacy: Does splitting the specimen for ancillary testing result in insufficient cellularity for the routine cytology sample? Cancer Cytopathol 2007;111(Suppl):419.
19. Bentz JS, Rowe LR, Gopez EV, Marshall CJ. The unsatisfactory ThinPrep Pap test: Missed opportunity for disease detection? Am J Clin Pathol 2002;117:457-463.
20. Haack LA, O'Brien D, Selvaggi SM. Protocol for the processing of bloody cervical specimens: Glacial acetic acid and the ThinPrep Pap test. Diagn Cytopathol 2006;34:210-213.
21. Pang Y, Smola B, Pu RT, Michael CW. Restoring satisfactory status in ThinPrep Pap test specimens with too few squamous cells and containing microscopic red blood cells. Diagn Cytopathol 2008;36:696-700.
22. Rowe LR, Bentz JS. A simple method to determine the need for glacial acetic acid treatment of bloody ThinPrep Pap tests before slide processing. Diagn Cytopathol 2004;31:321-325.
23. CYTYC. ThinPrep 2000 Operators Manual. 2006.
24. Islam S, West AM, Saboorian MH, Ashfaq R. Reprocessing unsatisfactory ThinPrep Papanicolaou test specimens increases sample adequacy and detection of significant cervicovaginal lesions. Cancer 2004;102:67-73. (Pubitemid 38489962)
25. Ylagan LR, Liu LH, Maluf HM. Endoscopic bile duct brushing of malignant pancreatic biliary strictures: Retrospective study with comparison of conventional smear and ThinPrep techniques. Diagn Cytopathol 2003;28:196-204.