DNA image cytometry in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions of the bile duct, the pancreatic duct and the papilla of Vater

Anticancer Research

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1579-1584

  Biesterfeld, Stefan ^a   Deacu, Liviu ^a  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bile duct neoplasms; Computer assisted; Cytometry; Differential diagnosis; DNA ploidy; Image analysis; Pancreas neoplasms

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT CANCER; BILE DUCT TUMOR; CELL SEPARATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOLOGY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DNA CONTENT; EPITHELIUM CELL; FEULGEN STAINING; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LYMPHOCYTE COUNT; PANCREAS CANCER; PANCREAS TUMOR; POLYPLOIDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VATER PAPILLA CARCINOMA; VATER PAPILLA TUMOR;

AMPULLA OF VATER; BILE DUCT NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, PANCREATIC DUCTAL; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DNA; HUMANS; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; POLYPLOIDY;

EID: 67650067153     PISSN: 02507005     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Lemon HM and Byrnes WW: Cancer of biliary tract and pancreas. Diagnosis from cytology of duodenal aspirates. J Am Med Assoc 24: 254-257, 1949.
2. Singh V, Bhasin S, Nain CK, Gupta SK, Singh G and Bose SM: Brush cytology in malignant biliary obstruction. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 46: 197-200, 2003. (Pubitemid 37428700)
3. Cobb CJ and Floyd WN: Usefulness of bile cytology in the diagnostic management of patients with biliary tract obstruction. Acta Cytol 29: 93-100, 1985. (Pubitemid 15083849)
4. Ryan ME and Baldauf MC: Comparison of flow cytometry for DNA content and brush cytology for detection of malignancy in pancreaticobiliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 40: 133-139, 1994. (Pubitemid 24129186)
5. Mohandas KM, Swaroop VS, Gullar SU, Dave UR, Jagannath P and de Souza LJ: Diagnosis of malignant obstructive jaundice by bile cytology: results improved by dilating the bile duct strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 40: 150-154, 1994. (Pubitemid 24129189)
6. Macken E, Drijkoningen M, van Aken E and van Steenbergen W: Brush cytology of ductal strictures during ERCP. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 63: 254-259, 2000. (Pubitemid 30815253)
7. Yamaguchi K, Nakamura, Shirahane K, Kawamoto M, Konomi H, Ohta M and Tanaka M: Pancreatic juice cytology in B?MN of the pancreas. Pancreatology 5: 416-421, 2005. (Pubitemid 41160280)
8. Nilsson B, Wee A and Yap I: Bile cytology. Diagnostic role in the management of biliary obstruction. Acta Cytol 39: 746-752, 1995.
9. Schulte EK, Joos U, Kasper M and Eckert HM: Cytological detection of epithelial dysplasia in the oral mucosa using Feulgen DNA-image cytometry. Diagn Cytopathol 7: 436-441, 1991.
10. Crissman JD and Zarbo RJ: Quantitation of DNA ploidy in squamous intraepithelial neoplasia of the laryngeal glottis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117: 182-188, 1991.
11. Auffermann W and Böcking A: Early detection of precancerous lesions in dysplasias of the lung by rapid DNA image cytometry. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 7: 218-226, 1985. (Pubitemid 16181847)
12. Evans AS, Monaghan JM and Anderson MC: A nuclear deoxyribonucleic acid analysis of normal and abnormal vulvar epithelium. Obstetr Gynecol 69: 790-793, 1987. (Pubitemid 17057844)
13. Böcking A, Hilgarth M, Auffermann W, Hack-Werdier C, Fischer-Becker D and von Kalckreuth G: DNA cytometric diagnosis of prospective malignancy in borderline lesions of the uterine cervix. Acta Cytol 30: 608-615, 1986. (Pubitemid 17207487)
14. Chatelain R, Schunck T, Schindler E, Schindler A and Böcking A: Diagnosis of prospective malignancy in koilocytic dysplasias of the uterine cervix with DNA cytometry. J Reprod Med 34: 505-510, 1989. (Pubitemid 19209662)
15. Biesterfeld S, Pennings K, Grußendorf-Conen EI and Böcking A: Aneuploidy in actinic keratosis and Bowen's disease - increased risk for invasive squamous cell carcinoma? Brit J Dermatol 133: 557-560, 1995.
16. Nasiell K, Auer G, Nasiell M and Zetterberg A: Retrospective DNA analysis in cervical dysplasias as related to neoplastic progression or regression. Anal Quant Cytol 1: 103-106, 1979. (Pubitemid 10194053)
17. Böcking A, Biesterfeld S and Liu SQ: DNA distribution in gastric cancer and dysplasia. In: Zhang YC, Kawai K (eds.). Precancerous conditions and lesions of the stomach, Springer, Berlin, pp. 103-120, 1993.
18. Biesterfeld S, Leitloff M, Rath W and Schröder W: DNA image cytometry in the differential diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial adenocarcinoma. Analyt Quant Cytol Histol 23: 123-128, 2001. (Pubitemid 32378084)
19. Biesterfeld S, Reus K, Bayer-Pietsch E, Mihalcea AM and Booking A: DNA image cytometry in the differential diagnosis of endocervical adenocarcinoma. Cancer 93: 160-164, 2001. (Pubitemid 32322172)
20. Krishnamurthy S, Katz RL, Shumate A, Strohlein K, Khanna A, Tucker SL, Raijman I and Lahoti S: DNA image analysis combined with routine cytology improves diagnostic sensitivity of common bile duct brushing. Cancer 93: 229-235, 2001. (Pubitemid 32552847)
21. Delgado R, Mikuz G and Hofstädter F: DNA-Feulgen-cytophotometric analysis of single cells from paraffin embedded tissue. Path Res Pract 179: 92-94, 1984. (Pubitemid 14014814)
22. Hedley DW, Friedlander ML and Taylor IW: Application of DNA flow cytometry to paraffin-embedded archival material for the study of aneuploidy and its clinical significance. Cytometry 6: 327-333, 1985. (Pubitemid 15060317)
23. Chatelain R, Willms A, Biesterfeld S, Auffermann W and Böcking A: Automated Feulgen staining with a temperature-controlled machine. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 11: 211-219, 1989. (Pubitemid 19203426)
24. Müller HW, Böcking A and Auer H: TV cytometer CM-1 for computer aided tumor diagnosis. In: Wied GL, Bartels PH, Rosenthal DL, Schenck U (eds.). Compendium of the computerized cytologic and histologic laboratory. Tutorials of Cytology, Chicago, USA, pp. 376-388, 1994.
25. Haroske G, Giroud F, Reith A and Böcking A: 1997 ESACP consensus report on diagnostic image cytometry. Part I: Basic considerations and recommendations for preparation, measurement and interpretation. Anal Cellul Pathol 17: 189-200, 1998.
26. Motherby H, Marcy T, Hecker M, Ross B, Nadjari B, Auer H, Müller KM, Häuss-inger D, Strauer BE and Booking A: Static DNA cytometry as a diagnostic aid in effusion cytology: I. DNA aneuploidy for identification and differentiation of primary and secondary tumors of the serous membranes. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 20: 153-161, 1998.
27. Böcking A, Adler CP, Common HH, Hilgarth M, Granzen B and Auffermann W: Algorithm for a DNA-cytophotometric diagnosis and grading of malignancy. Anal Quant Cytol 6: 1-8, 1984. (Pubitemid 14142963)
28. Ploem-Zaijer JJ, Beyer-Boon ME, Leyte-Veldstra L and Ploem JS: Cytofluorometric and cytophotometric DNA measurements of cervical smears stained using a new bicolor method. In: Pressman NJ, Wied GL (eds.). Automation of cancer cytology and cell image analysis. Tutorials of cytology, Chicago, pp. 225-235, 1979.
29. Chatelain R, Schunck T, Schindler E, Schindler A and Böcking A: Diagnosis of prospective malignancy in koilocytic dysplasias of the uterine cervix with DNA cytometry. J Reprod Med 34: 505-510, 1989. (Pubitemid 19209662)
30. Stenkvist B and Strande G: Entropy as an algorithm for the statistical description of DNA cytometric data obtained by image analysis microscopy. Anal Cellul Pathol 2: 159-165, 1990. (Pubitemid 20108850)
31. Biesterfeld S, Gerres K, Fischer-Wein G and Böcking A: Polyploidy in non-neoplastic tissues. J Clin Pathol 47: 38-42, 1994.
32. Baretton G, Blasenbreu S, Vogt T, Löhrs U, Rau H and Schmidt M: DNA ploidy in carcinoma of the gallbladder. Prognostic significance and comparison of flow and image cytometry on archival tumor material. Pathol Res Pract 190: 584-592, 1994.
33. Rijken AM, Belien JA, van Gulik TM, Polak MM, Offerhaus GJ, Gouma DJ and Baak JP: DNA quantitation of distal bile duct carcinoma measured by image and flow cytometry. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 21: 303-310, 1999. (Pubitemid 29383447)
34. Linder S, Falkmer U, Hagmar T, Blåsjö M, Sundelin P and von Rosen A: Prognostic significance of DNA ploidy in pancreatic carcinoma. Pancreas 9: 764-772, 1994. (Pubitemid 24317831)
35. Hittelet AB, Yeaton P, Decaestecker C, Remmelink M, Nagy N, Cremer M, Salmon I, Kiss R and Bourgeois N: Discrimination between dysplastic and malignant epithelium of the ampulla of vater based on quantitative image cytometric data. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 22: 98-106, 2000. (Pubitemid 30212683)
36. Sato Y, Tanaka J, Koyama K, van Gulik TM, Lygidakis NJ and van der Heyde MN: Tumor DNA content in gallbladder carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterol 40: 375-379, 1993. (Pubitemid 23258559)
37. Sears RJ, Duckworth CW, Decaestecker C, Bourgeois N, Ledent T, Deviere J, Salmon I, Kiss R and Yeaton P: Image cytometry as a discriminatory tool for cytologic specimens obtained by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Cancer 84: 119-126, 1998. (Pubitemid 28275338)
38. Kipp BR, Stadheim LM, Hailing SA, Pochron NL, Harmsen S, Nagorney DM, Sebo TJ, Therneau TM, Gores GJ, de Groen PC, Baron TH, Levy MJ, Halling KC and Roberts LR: A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures. Am J Gastroenterol 99: 1675-1681, 2004.