LASIK World Literature Review. Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction

Ophthalmology

Volumn 116, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 691-701

  Solomon, Kerry D ^a   Fernández de Castro, Luis E ^a   Sandoval, Helga P ^a   Biber, Joseph M ^a   Groat, Brian ^a   Neff, Kristiana D ^a   Ying, Michelle S ^a   French, John W ^a   Donnenfeld, Eric D ^b   Lindstrom, Richard L ^c  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b OPHTHALMIC CONSULTANTS OF LONG ISLAND   (United States)

^c MINNESOTA EYE CONSULTANTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; DATA BASE; HUMAN; HYPERMETROPIA; KERATOMILEUSIS; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MYOPIA; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BIBLIOMETRICS; HUMANS; HYPEROPIA; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; MIDDLE AGED; MYOPIA; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WORLD HEALTH;

EID: 63349097191     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.037     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Sekundo W., Bonicke K., Mattausch P., and Wiegand W. Six year follow-up of laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate and extreme myopia using a first-generation excimer laser and microkeratome. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 (2003) 1152-1158
2. O'Doherty M., O'Keeffe M., and Kelleher C. Five year follow up of laser in situ keratomileusis for all levels of myopia. Br J Ophthalmol 90 (2006) 20-23
3. Hammond M.D., Madigan Jr. W.P., and Bower K.S. Refractive surgery in the United States Army, 2000-2003. Ophthalmology 112 (2005) 184-190
4. Bailey M.D., and Zadnik K. Outcomes of LASIK for myopia with FDA-approved lasers. Cornea 26 (2007) 246-254
5. Sugar A., Rapuano C.J., Culbertson W.W., et al. Ophthalmic Technology Assessment Committee 2000-2001 Refractive Surgery Panel. Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and astigmatism: safety and efficacy. A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 109 (2002) 175-187
6. Varley G.A., Huang D., Rapuano C.J., et al. Ophthalmic Technology Assessment Committee Refractive Surgery Panel. LASIK for hyperopia, hyperopic astigmatism, and mixed astigmatism: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 111 (2004) 1604-1617
7. Avis M., Bond M., and Arthur A. Questioning patient satisfaction: an empirical investigation in two outpatient clinics. Soc Sci Med 44 (1997) 85-92
8. Doughman D.J., and Hardten D.R. Loss of vision after laser in situ keratomileusis. Eye Contact Lens 29 suppl (2003) S135-S138
9. Soroka M., Crump T., and Bennett A. Patient satisfaction with LASIK surgery in New York State. Manag Care Interface 18 (2005) 59-62
10. Bailey M.D., Mitchell G.L., Dhaliwal D.K., et al. Patient satisfaction and visual symptoms after laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology 110 (2003) 1371-1378
11. Tahzib N.G., Bootsma S.J., Eggink F.A., et al. Functional outcomes and patient satisfaction after laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 1943-1951
12. Pérez-Santonja J.J., Bellot J., Claramonte P., et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis to correct high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 23 (1997) 372-385
13. Saragoussi D., and Saragoussi J.J. LASIK, PRK and quality of vision: a study of prognostic factors and a satisfaction survey [in French]. J Fr Ophtalmol 27 (2004) 755-764
14. McGhee C.N., Craig J.P., Sachdev N., et al. Functional, psychological, and satisfaction outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 26 (2000) 497-509
15. Hill J.C. An informal satisfaction survey of 200 patients after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 18 (2002) 454-459
16. Jaycock P.D., O'Brart D.P., Rajan M.S., and Marshall J. 5-year follow-up of LASIK for hyperopia. Ophthalmology 112 (2005) 191-199
17. el Danasoury M.A., Waring III G.O., el Maghraby A., and Mehrez K. Excimer laser in situ keratomileusis to correct compound myopic astigmatism. J Refract Surg 13 (1997) 511-520
18. Miller A.E., McCulley J.P., Bowman R.W., et al. Patient satisfaction after LASIK for myopia. CLAO J 27 (2001) 84-88
19. Jabbur N.S., Kraff C., and Visx Wavefront Study Group. Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis using the WaveScan system for correction of low to moderate myopia with astigmatism: 6-month results in 277 eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 1493-1501
20. Twa M.D., Lembach R.G., Bullimore M.A., and Roberts C. A prospective randomized clinical trial of laser in situ keratomileusis with two different lasers. Am J Ophthalmol 140 (2005) 173-183
21. Akhaury R.K., Verma N.P., and Kumar R. Patient motivation for laser in situ keratomileusis in the state of Bihar. J Refract Surg 20 suppl (2004) S727-S729
22. Schmidt G.W., Yoon M., McGwin G., et al. Evaluation of the relationship between ablation diameter, pupil size, and visual function with vision-specific quality-of-life measures after laser in situ keratomileusis. Arch Ophthalmol 125 (2007) 1037-1042
23. Ibrahim O. Laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism. J Refract Surg 14 suppl (1998) S179-S182
24. Uçakhan O.O. Laser in situ keratomileusis for compound myopic astigmatism using the Meditec MEL 70 G-Scan excimer laser. J Refract Surg 19 (2003) 124-130
25. Slade S. Contralateral comparison of Alcon CustomCornea and VISX CustomVue wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: one-month results. J Refract Surg 20 (2004) S601-S605
26. Payvar S., and Hashemi H. Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopic astigmatism with the Nidek EC-5000 laser. J Refract Surg 18 (2002) 225-233
27. McGhee C.N., Orr D., Kidd B., et al. Psychological aspects of excimer laser surgery for myopia: reasons for seeking treatment and patient satisfaction. Br J Ophthalmol 80 (1996) 874-879
28. Waring III G.O., Arentsen J.J., Bourque L.B., et al. Design features of the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) study. Int Ophthalmol Clin 23 (1983) 145-165
29. Ben-Sira A., Loewenstein A., Lipshitz I., et al. Patient satisfaction after 5.0-mm photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. J Refract Surg 13 (1997) 129-134
30. Powers M.K., Meyerowitz B.E., Arrowsmith P.N., and Marks R.G. Psychosocial findings in radial keratotomy patients two years after surgery. Ophthalmology 91 (1984) 1193-1198
31. Kahle G., Seiler T., and Wollensak J. Report on psychosocial findings and satisfaction among patients 1 year after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Refract Corneal Surg 8 (1992) 286-289
32. Levinson B.A., Rapuano C.J., Cohen E.J., et al. Referrals to the Wills Eye Institute Cornea Service after laser in situ keratomileusis: reasons for patient dissatisfaction. J Cataract Refract Surg 34 (2008) 32-39
33. Ambrósio Jr. R., Jardim D., Netto M.V., and Wilson S.E. Management of unsuccessful LASIK surgery. Compr Ophthalmol Update 8 (2007) 125-141
34. Stotland M.A., Kowalski J.W., and Ray B.B. Patient-reported benefit and satisfaction with botulinum toxin type A treatment of moderate to severe glabellar rhytides: results from a prospective open-label study. Plast Reconstr Surg 120 (2007) 1386-1393
35. Sommer B., Zschocke I., Bergfeld D., et al. Satisfaction of patients after treatment with botulinum toxin for dynamic facial lines. Dermatol Surg 29 (2003) 456-460
36. Honigman R.J., Phillips K.A., and Castle D.J. A review of psychosocial outcomes for patients seeking cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 113 (2004) 1229-1237
37. Shakespeare V., and Cole R.P. Measuring patient-based outcomes in a plastic surgery service: breast reduction surgical patients. Br J Plast Surg 50 (1997) 242-248
38. Makki A.S., and Ghanem A.A. Long-term results and patient satisfaction with reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 41 (1998) 370-377
39. Brown A.P., Hill C., and Khan K. Outcome of reduction mammaplasty-a patients' perspective. Br J Plast Surg 53 (2000) 584-587
40. Schnur P.L., Schnur D.P., Petty P.M., et al. Reduction mammaplasty: an outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg 100 (1997) 875-883
41. Chao J.D., Memmel H.C., Redding J.F., et al. Reduction mammaplasty is a functional operation, improving quality of life in symptomatic women: a prospective, single-center breast reduction outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg 110 (2002) 1644-1652
42. Cunningham B.L., Lokeh A., and Gutowski K.A. Saline-filled breast implant safety and efficacy: a multicenter retrospective review. Plast Reconstr Surg 105 (2000) 2143-2149
43. Gutowski K.A., Mesna G.T., and Cunningham B.L. Saline-filled breast implants: a Plastic Surgery Educational Foundation multicenter outcomes study. Plast Reconstr Surg 100 (1997) 1019-1027
44. Spear S.L., Murphy D.K., Slicton A., et al., Inamed Silicone Breast Implant U.S. Study Group. Inamed silicone breast implant core study results at 6 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 120 suppl (2007) 8S-16S
45. Hovi S.L., Hemminki E., and Swan S.H. Cosmetic and postmastectomy breast implants: Finnish women's experiences. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 8 (1999) 933-939
46. Handel N., Cordray T., Gutierrez J., and Jensen J.A. A long-term study of outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction with breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 117 (2006) 757-767
47. Cash T.F., Duel L.A., and Perkins L.L. Women's psychosocial outcomes of breast augmentation with silicone gel-filled implants: a 2-year prospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg 109 (2002) 2112-2121
48. Bengtson B.P., Van Natta B.W., Murphy D.K., et al., Style 410 U.S. Core Clinical Study Group. Style 410 highly cohesive silicone breast implant core study results at 3 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 120 suppl (2007) 40S-48S
49. Araco A., Gravante G., Araco F., et al. A retrospective analysis of 3,000 primary aesthetic breast augmentations: postoperative complications and associated factors. Aesthetic Plast Surg 31 (2007) 532-539
50. Niechajev I., Jurell G., and Lohjelm L. Prospective study comparing two brands of cohesive gel breast implants with anatomic shape: 5-year follow-up evaluation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 31 (2007) 697-710
51. Guyuron B., and Bokhari F. Patient satisfaction following rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 20 (1996) 153-157
52. Gräber I., Jovanovic S., and Berghaus A. Subjective and objective evaluation of the outcome of rhinoplasty: a retrospective study [in German]. Laryngorhinootologie 74 (1995) 495-499
53. Hellings P.W., and Nolst Trenité G.J. Long-term patient satisfaction after revision rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 117 (2007) 985-989
54. Dover J.S., Zelickson B., and 14-Physician Multispecialty Consensus Panel. Results of a survey of 5,700 patient monopolar radiofrequency facial skin tightening treatments: assessment of a low-energy multiple-pass technique leading to a clinical end point algorithm. Dermatol Surg 33 (2007) 900-907
55. Booth A.J., Murray A., and Tyers A.G. The direct brow lift: efficacy, complications, and patient satisfaction. Br J Ophthalmol 88 (2004) 688-691
56. Withey S., Witherow H., and Waterhouse N. One hundred cases of endoscopic brow lift. Br J Plast Surg 55 (2002) 20-24
57. Broughton II G., Horton B., Lipschitz A., et al. Lifestyle outcomes, satisfaction, and attitudes of patients after liposuction: a Dallas experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 117 (2006) 1738-1749
58. Hanke W., Cox S.E., Kuznets N., and Coleman III W.P. Tumescent liposuction report performance measurement initiative: national survey results. Dermatol Surg 30 (2004) 967-977
59. Augustin M., Zschocke I., Sommer B., and Sattler G. Sociodemographic profile and satisfaction with treatment of patients undergoing liposuction in tumescent local anesthesia. Dermatol Surg 25 (1999) 480-483
60. Hensel J.M., Lehman Jr. J.A., Tantri M.P., et al. An outcomes analysis and satisfaction survey of 199 consecutive abdominoplasties. Ann Plast Surg 46 (2001) 357-363
61. Bragg T.W., Jose R.M., and Srivastava S. Patient satisfaction following abdominoplasty: an NHS experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 60 (2007) 75-78
62. Floros C., and Davis P.K. Complications and long-term results following abdominoplasty: a retrospective study. Br J Plast Surg 44 (1991) 190-194
63. Pesudovs K., Garamendi E., and Elliot D.B. A quality of life comparison of people wearing spectacles or contact lenses or having undergone refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 22 (2006) 19-27
64. Chen C.Y., Keeffe J.E., Garoufalis P., et al. Vision-related quality of life comparison for emmetropes, myopes after refractive surgery, and myopes wearing spectacles or contact lenses. J Refract Surg 23 (2007) 752-759
65. Pesudovs K., Garamendi E., and Elliot D.B. The Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC) questionnaire: development and validation. Optom Vis Sci 81 (2004) 769-777
66. Partal A.E., and Manche E.E. CustomVue laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and myopic astigmatism using the Visx S4 excimer laser: efficacy, predictability, and safety. J Cataract Refract Surg 32 (2006) 475-479
67. Lee Y.C. Active eye-tracking improves LASIK results. J Refract Surg 23 (2007) 581-585
68. Horowitz J., Mezer E., Shochat T., et al. Refractive surgery in Israel Defense Forces recruits. J Cataract Refract Surg 34 (2008) 243-246
69. Schuyler D. NASA approves all-laser LASIK for astronauts. ESCRS EuroTimes (2008) 21. http://www.escrs.org/Publications/Eurotimes/08Feb/NASAapprovesalllaser.p df February. Accessed December 2, 2008
70. Lim T., Yang S., Kim M., and Tchah H. Comparison of the IntraLase femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome for laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol 141 (2006) 833-839
71. Management and therapy of dry eye disease: report of the Management and Therapy Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007). Ocular Surf 5 (2007) 163-178
72. Behrens A., Doyle J.J., Stern L., et al. Dysfunctional Tear Syndrome Study Group. Dysfunctional tear syndrome: A Delphi approach to treatment recommendations. Cornea 25 (2006) 900-907
73. Becker A., Blümle A., Antes G., et al. Controlled trials in aesthetic plastic surgery: a 16-year analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32 (2008) 359-362