Second harmonic generation microscopy probes different states of motor protein interaction in myofibrils

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 99, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1842-1851

  Schürmann, Sebastian ^a   Von Wegner, Frederic ^a   Fink, Rainer H A ^a   Friedrich, Oliver ^b,d   Vogel, Martin ^a,c,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^e MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF BIOPHYSICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MURINAE;

EID: 77957355965     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Franken, P. A., A. E. Hill, G. Weinreich. 1961. Generation of optical harmonics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 7: 118-119.
2. Roth, S., and I. Freund. 1979. Second harmonic generation in collagen. J. Chem. Phys. 70: 1637-1643.
3. Campagnola, P. J., A. C. Millard, W. A. Mohler. 2002. Three- dimensional high-resolution second-harmonic generation imaging of endogenous structural proteins in biological tissues. Biophys. J. 82: 493-508.
4. Both, M., M. Vogel, D. Uttenweiler. 2004. Second harmonic imaging of intrinsic signals in muscle fibers in situ. J. Biomed. Opt. 9: 882-892.
5. Plotnikov, S. V., A. C. Millard, W. A. Mohler. 2006. Characterization of the myosin-based source for second-harmonic generation from muscle sarcomeres. Biophys. J. 90: 693-703.
6. Llewellyn, M. E., R. P. J. Barretto, M. J. Schnitzer. 2008. Minimally invasive high-speed imaging of sarcomere contractile dynamics in mice and humans. Nature. 454: 784-788.
7. Friedrich, O., M. Both, C. Garbe. 2010. Microarchitecture is severely compromised but motor protein function is preserved in dystrophic MDX skeletal muscle. Biophys. J. 98: 606-616.
8. Freund, I., M. Deutsch, and A. Sprecher. 1986. Connective tissue polarity. Optical second-harmonic microscopy, crossed-beam summation, and small-angle scattering in rat-tail tendon. Biophys. J. 50: 693-712.
9. Mertz, J., and L. Moreaux. 2001. Second-harmonic generation by focused excitation of inhomogeneously distributed scatterers. Opt. Commun. 196: 325-330.
10. Stoller, P., B.-M. Kim, L. B. Da Silva. 2002. Polarization-dependent optical second-harmonic imaging of a rat-tail tendon. J. Biomed. Opt. 7: 205-214.
11. Williams, R. M., W. R. Zipfel, and W. W. Webb. 2005. Interpreting second-harmonic generation images of collagen I fibrils. Biophys. J. 88: 1377-1386.
12. Chu, S.-W., S.-Y. Chen., C. K. Sun. 2004. Studies of x2/x3 tensors in submicron-scaled bio-tissues by polarization harmonics optical microscopy. Biophys. J. 86: 3914-3922.
13. Berger, C. L., J. S. Craik., Y. E. Goldman. 1996. Fluorescence polarization of skeletal muscle fibers labeled with rhodamine isomers on the myosin heavy chain. Biophys. J. 71: 3330-3343.
14. Irving, M., T. St Claire Allen, Y. E. Goldman. 1995. Tilting of the light-chain region of myosin during step length changes and active force generation in skeletal muscle. Nature. 375: 688-691.
15. Millman, B. M. 1998. The filament lattice of striated muscle. Physiol. Rev. 78: 359-391.
16. Kleinman, D. A. 1962. Nonlinear dielectric polarization in optical media. Phys. Rev. 126: 1977.
17. Asatryan, A. A., C. J. R. Sheppard, and C. M. de Sterke. 2004. Vector treatment of second-harmonic generation produced by tightly focused vignetted Gaussian beams. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B. 21: 2206-2212.
18. Yew, E. Y. S., and C. J. R. Sheppard. 2006. Effects of axial field components on second harmonic generation microscopy. Opt. Express. 14: 1167-1174.
19. Yew, E. Y. S., and C. J. R. Sheppard. 2007. Second harmonic generation polarization microscopy with tightly focused linearly and radially polarized beams. Opt. Commun. 275: 453-457.
20. Novotny, L. 1997. Allowed and forbidden light in near-field optics. II. Interacting dipolar particles. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. 14: 105-113. (Pubitemid 127573807)
21. Cheng, J.-X., and X. S. Xie. 2002. Green's function formulation for third-harmonic generation microscopy. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B. 19: 1604-1610.
22. Richards, B., and E. Wolf. 1959. Electromagnetic diffraction in optical systems. II. Structure of the image field in an aplanatic system. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci. 253: 358-379.
23. Leutenegger, M., R. Rao, T. Lasser. 2006. Fast focus field calculations. Opt. Express. 14: 11277-11291.
24. Légaré, F., C. Pfeffer, and B. R. Olsen. 2007. The role of backscattering in SHG tissue imaging. Biophys. J. 93: 1312-1320.
25. Jahne, B. 1993. Spatio-Temporal Image Processing. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
26. Shaw, M. A., E. M. Ostap, and Y. E. Goldman. 2003. Mechanism of inhibition of skeletal muscle actomyosin by n-benzyl-p-toluenesulfo- namide. Biochemistry. 42: 6128-6135.
27. Schürmann, S., C. Weber., M. Vogel. 2007. Myosin rods are a source of second harmonic generation signals in skeletal muscle. Proc. SPIE. 6442: 64421U.
28. Nucciotti, V., C. Stringari, . , F. S. Pavone. 2007. Study of skeletal muscle cross-bridge population dynamics by second harmonic generation. Proc. SPIE. 6442: 644219.
29. Nucciotti, V., C. Stringari, F. S. Pavone. 2010. Probing myosin structural conformation in vivo by second-harmonic generation microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 107: 7763-7768.
30. Beck, K., and B. Brodsky. 1998. Supercoiled protein motifs: the collagen triple-helix and the α-helical coiled coil. J. Struct. Biol. 122: 17-29.
31. Stewart, M., and P. Edwards. 1984. Length of myosin rod and its proteolytic fragments determined by electron microscopy. FEBS Lett. 168: 75-78.
32. Adamovic, I., S. M. Mijailovich, and M. Karplus. 2008. The elastic properties of the structurally characterized myosin II S2 subdomain: a molecular dynamics and normal mode analysis. Biophys. J. 94: 3779-3789.
33. Finer, J. T., R. M. Simmons, and J. A. Spudich. 1994. Single myosin molecule mechanics: picoNewton forces and nanometer steps. Nature. 368: 113-119.
34. Molloy, J. E., J. E. Burns, . , D. C. White. 1995. Movement and force produced by a single myosin head. Nature. 378: 209-212.
35. Holmes, K. C. 1997. The swinging lever-arm hypothesis of muscle contraction. Curr. Biol. 7: R112-R118.
36. Ruff, C., M. Furch, E. Meyhöfer. 2001. Single-molecule tracking of myosins with genetically engineered amplifier domains. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8: 226-229.
37. Walker, M., P. Knight, and J. Trinick. 1991. Properties of the myosin molecule revealed by negative staining. Micron Microsc. Acta. 22: 413-422.
38. Walker, M., P. Knight, and J. Trinick. 1985. Negative staining of myosin molecules. J. Mol. Biol. 184: 535-542.
39. Suggs, J. A., A. Cammarato, . , S. I. Bernstein. 2007. Alternative S2 hinge regions of the myosin rod differentially affect muscle function, myofibril dimensions and myosin tail length. J. Mol. Biol. 367: 1312-1329.
40. Lymn, R. W. 1978. Myosin subfragment-1 attachment to actin. Expected effect on equatorial reflections. Biophys. J. 21: 93-98.
41. Clark, K. A., A. S. McElhinny, . , C. C. Gregorio. 2002. Striated muscle cytoarchitecture: an intricate web of form and function. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 18: 637-706.