How object-specific are object files? Evidence for integration by location

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1184-1192

  van Dam, Wessel O ^a   Hommel, Bernhard ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Attention; Binding; Feature integration

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; LEARNING; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REACTION TIME; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMANS; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957348324     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0019955     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Akyürek E.G., Riddell P.M., Toffanin P., Hommel B. Adaptive control of event integration: Evidence from event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 2007, 44:383-391.
2. Akyürek E.G., Toffanin P., Hommel B. Adaptive control of event integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:569-577.
3. Allport D.A., Tipper S.P., Chmiel N.R.J. Perceptual integration and postcategorical filtering. Attention and performance XI 1985, 107-132. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. M.I. Posner, O.S.M. Marin (Eds.).
4. Baylis G.C., Driver J. Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1993, 19:451-470.
5. Colzato L.S., Raffone A., Hommel B. What do we learn from binding features? Evidence for multilevel feature integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:705-716.
6. Desimone R., Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience 1995, 18:193-222.
7. Duncan J. Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1984, 113:501-517.
8. Duncan J. Similarity between concurrent visual discriminations: Dimensions and objects. Perception & Psychophysics 1993, 54:425-430.
9. Duncan J. Cooperating brain systems in selective perception and action. Attention and performance XVI 1996, 549-576. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. T. Inui, J.L. McClelland (Eds.).
10. Duncan J., Humphreys G., Ward R. Competitive brain activity in visual attention. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 1997, 7:255-261.
11. Dutzi I.B., Hommel B. The microgenesis of action-effect binding. Psychological Research 2009, 73:425-435.
12. Gordon R.D., Irwin D.E. What's in an object file? Evidence from priming studies. Perception & Psychophysics 1996, 58:1260-1277.
13. Henderson J.M., Anes M.D. Roles of object-file review and type priming in visual identification within and across eye fixations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:826-839.
14. Hommel B. Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus response episodes. Visual Cognition 1998, 5:183-216.
15. Hommel B. Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:494-500.
16. Hommel B. How much attention does an event file need?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:1067-1082.
17. Hommel B. Feature integration across perception and action: Event files affect response choice. Psychological Research 2007, 71:42-63.
18. Hommel B., Akyürek E.G. Lag-1 sparing in the attentional blink: Benefits and costs of integrating two events into a single episode. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 2005, 58(A):1415-1433.
19. Hommel B., Colzato L.S. Visual attention and the temporal dynamics of feature integration. Visual Cognition 2004, 11:483-521.
20. Hommel B., Colzato L.S. When an object is more than a binding of its features: Evidence for two mechanisms of visual feature integration. Visual Cognition 2009, 17:120-140.
21. Kahneman D., Treisman A., Gibbs B.J. The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology 1992, 24:175-219.
22. Keizer A.W., Nieuwenhuis S., Colzato L.S., Theeuwisse W., Rombouts S.A.R.B., Hommel B. When moving faces activate the house area: An fMRI study of object file retrieval. Behavioral and Brain Functions 2008, 4:50.
23. Leslie A.M., Xu F., Tremoulet P.D., Scholl B.J. Indexing and the object concept: Developing " what" and " where" systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1998, 2:10-18.
24. Mitroff S.R., Scholl B.J., Noles N.S. Object files can be purely episodic. Perception 2007, 36:1730-1735.
25. Mozer M.C., Vecera S.P. Object- and space-based attention. Neurobiology of attention 2005, 130-134. Elsevier, New York. L. Itti, G. Rees, J. Tsotsos (Eds.).
26. Noles N.S., Scholl B.J., Mitroff S.R. The persistence of object file representations. Perception & Psychophysics 2005, 67:324-334.
27. O'Craven K.M., Downing P.E., Kanwisher N.G. fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection. Nature 1999, October 7, 401:584-587.
28. Potter M.C., Staub A., O'Connor D.H. The time course of competition for attention: Attention is initially labile. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:1149-1162.
29. Schneider W.X. Space-based visual attention models and object selection. Psychological Research 1993, 56:35-43.
30. Stoet G., Hommel B. Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1999, 25:1625-1640.
31. Tipper S.P., Weaver B. The medium of attention: Location-based, object-centered or scene-based?. Visual attention 1998, 77-107. Oxford University Press, New York. R.D. Wright (Ed.).
32. Treisman A. Perceiving and re-perceiving objects. American Psychologist 1992, 47:862-875.
33. Treisman A. The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 1996, 6:171-178.
34. Treisman A. Feature binding, attention and object perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B 1998, 353:1295-1306.
35. Treisman A., Gelade G. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 1980, 12:97-136.
36. Treisman A., Gormican S. Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review 1988, 95:15-48.
37. Wickens J., Hyland B., Anson G. Cortical cell assemblies: A possible mechanism for motor programs. Journal of Motor Behavior 1994, 26:66-82.
38. Xu Y. Encoding objects in visual short-term memory: The roles of feature proximity and connectedness. Perception & Psychophysics 2006, 68:815-828.
39. Zeki S.M. The functional organization of projections from striate to prestriate visual cortex in the rhesus monkey. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 1976, 15:591-600.