Modelling pheromone anemotaxis for biosecurity surveillance: Moth movement patterns reveal a downwind component of anemotaxis

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 221, Issue 23, 2010, Pages 2801-2807

  Guichard, S ^a,b   Kriticos, D J ^b   Kean, J M ^c   Worner, S P ^d  

^a SCION   (New Zealand)

^b CSIRO   (Australia)

^c AGRESEARCH LTD   (New Zealand)

^d LINCOLN UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Anemotaxis; Flight behaviour; Lepidoptera; Moth; Pheromone

Indexed keywords

ANEMOTAXIS; FLIGHT BEHAVIOUR; LEPIDOPTERA; MOTH; PHEROMONE;

ATTITUDE CONTROL; MANAGERS;

MANAGEMENT;

ALGORITHM; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; DETECTION METHOD; DISPERSAL; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; FLIGHT BEHAVIOR; MOTH; MOVEMENT; NUMERICAL MODEL; PEST CONTROL; PHEROMONE TRAP;

HEXAPODA; LEPIDOPTERA;

EID: 77957308960     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.08.030     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Augustin S., Guichard S., Svatos A., Gilbert M. Monitoring the regional spread of the invasive leafminer Cameraria ohridella (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) by damage assessment and pheromone trapping. Environ. Entomol. 2004, 33:1584-1592.
2. Baker T.C., Haynes K.F. Pheromone-mediated optomotor anemotaxis and altitude control exhibited by male oriental fruit moths in the field. Physiol. Entomol. 1996, 21:20-32.
3. Balkovsky E., Shraiman B.I. Olfactory search at high Reynolds number. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99:12589-12593.
4. Beasley D., Bull D.R., Martin R.R. An overview of genetic algorithms: part 1, Fundamentals. University Computing 1993, 15:58-69.
5. Byers J.A. Temporal clumping of bark beetle arrival at pheromone traps: modeling anemotaxis in chaotic plumes. J. Chem. Ecol. 1996, 22:2133-2155.
6. Cannon R.J.C., Koerper D., Ashby S., Baker R., Bartlett P.W., Brookes G., Burgess R., Cheek S., Evans H.F., Hammon R., Head J., Nettleton G., Robinson J., Slawson D., Taylor M.C., Tilbury C.A., Ward M. Gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar, outbreak in northeast London, 1995-2003. Int. J. Pest Manag. 2004, 50:259-273.
7. Cardé R.T., Hagaman T.E. Behavioral responses of the gypsy moth in a wind tunnel to air-borne enantiomers of disparlure. Environ. Entomol. 1979, 8:475-484.
8. Cardé R.T., Knols B.G.J. Effects of light levels and plume structure on the orientation manoeuvres of male gypsy moths flying along pheromone plumes. Physiol. Entomol. 2000, 25:141-150.
9. Cardé R.T., Willis M.A. Navigational strategies used by insects to find distant, wind-borne sources of odor. J. Chem. Ecol. 2008, 34:854-866.
10. Carter P.C.S. Risk assessment and pest detection surveys for exotic pests and diseases which threaten commercial forestry in New Zealand. N. Z. J. Sci. 1989, 19:353-374.
11. Charlton R.E., Kanno H., Collins R.D., Cardé R.T. Influence of pheromone concentration and ambient temperature on flight of the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.), in a sustained-light wind tunnel. Physiol. Entomol. 1993, 18:349-362.
12. Colautti R.I., Bailey S.A., Van Overdijk C.D.A., Amundsen K., MacIsaac H.J. Characterised and projected costs of nonindigenous species in Canada. Biol. Invasions 2006, 8:45-59.
13. Colvin J., Brady J., Gibson G. Visually-guided, upwind turning behaviour of free-flying tsetse flies in odour-laden wind: a wind-tunnel study. Physiol. Entomol. 1989, 14:31-39.
14. Currano E.D., Wilf P., Wing S.L., Labandeira C.C., Lovelock E.C., Royer D.L. Sharply increased insect herbivory during the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:1960-1964.
15. David C.T., Kennedy J.S., Ludlow A.R. Finding of a sex pheromone source by gypsy moths released in the field. Nature 1983, 303:804-806.
16. David C.T., Kennedy J.S., Ludlow A.R., Perry J.N., Wall C. A reappraisal of insect flight towards a distant point source of wind-borne odor. J. Chem. Ecol. 1982, 8:1207-1215.
17. Duboz R., Versmisse D., Travers M., Ramat E., Shin Y.-J. Application of an evolutionary algorithm to the inverse parameter estimation of an individual-based model. Ecol. Model. 2010, 221:840-849.
18. El-Sayed A.M., Trimble R.M. Relative attractiveness, of natural and synthetic pheromone of three tortricid tree fruit pests. Environ. Entomol. 2002, 31:960-964.
19. Elkinton J.S., Schal C., Ono T., Cardé R.T. Pheromone puff trajectory and upwind flight of male gypsy moths in a forest. Physiol. Entomol. 1987, 12:399-406.
20. Fadamiro H.Y., Wyatt T.D., Birch M.C. Flying beetles respond as moths predict: optomotor anemotaxis to pheromone plumes at different heights. J. Insect Behav. 1998, 11:549-557.
21. Guichard S., Kriticos D.J., Leriche A., Worner S.P., Kean J.M., Suckling D.M. Evidence of active or passive downwind dispersal in mark-release-recapture of moths. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2010, 134:160-169.
22. Hosking G., Clearwater J., Handiside J., Kay M., Ray J., Simmons N. Tussock moth eradication-a success story from New Zealand. Int. J. Pest Manag. 2003, 49:17-24.
23. Kean J.M., Suckling D.M. Estimating the probability of eradication of painted apple moth from Auckland. New Zealand Plant Protection 2005, vol. 58:7-11. The New Zealand Plant Protection Society Inc., Wellington, New Zealand.
24. Kennedy J.S. The visual responses of flying mosquitoes. Proc. Zoolog. Soc. Lond. (A) 1939, 109:221-242.
25. Kennedy J.S. Zigzagging and casting as a programmed response to wind-borne odour: a review. Physiol. Entomol. 1983, 8:109-120.
26. Kennedy J.S., Marsh D. Pheromone-regulated anemotaxis in flying moths. Science 1974, 184:999-1001.
27. Kriticos D.J., Phillips C.B., Suckling D.M. Improving border biosecurity: potential economic benefits to New Zealand. New Zealand Plant Protection 2005, vol. 58:1-6. The New Zealand Plant Protection Society Inc., Wellington, New Zealand.
28. Kriticos D.J., Potter K.J.B., Alexander N.S., Gibb A.R., Suckling D.M. Using a pheromone lure survey to establish the native and potential distribution of an invasive Lepidopteran Uraba lugens. J. Appl. Ecol. 2007, 44:853-863.
29. Kuenen L.P.S., Baker T.C. Optomotor regulation of ground velocity in moths during flight to sex pheromone at different heights. Physiol. Entomol. 1982, 7:193-202.
30. Kuenen L.P.S., Cardé R.T. Strategies for recontacting a lost pheromone plume: casting and upwind flight in the male gypsy moth. Physiol. Entomol. 1994, 19:15-29.
31. Logan J.A., Regniere J., Gray D.R., Munson A.S. Risk assessment in the face of a changing environment: gypsy moth and climate change in Utah. Ecol. Appl. 2007, 17:101-117.
32. Mafra-Neto A., Cardé R.T. Fine-scale structure of pheromone plumes modulates upwind orientation of flying moths. Nature 1994, 369:142-144.
33. Mafra-Neto A., Cardé R.T. Rate of realized interception of pheromone pulses in different wind speeds modulates almond moth orientation. J. Comp. Physiol. A 1998, 182:563-572.
34. Marsh D., Kennedy J.S., Ludlow A.R. An analysis of anemotactic zigzagging flight in male moths stimulated by pheromone. Physiol. Entomol. 1978, 3:221-240.
35. Marsh D., Kennedy J.S., Ludlow A.R. Analysis of zigzagging flight in moths: a correction. Physiol. Entomol. 1981, 6:225.
36. Maynard G.V., Hamilton J.G., Grimshaw J.F. Quarantine - Phytosanitary, sanitary and incursion management: an Australian entomological perspective. Aust. J. Entomol. 2004, 43:318-328.
37. McCullough D.G., Work T.T., Cavey J.F., Liebhold A.M., Marshall D. Interceptions of nonindigenous plant pests at US ports of entry and border crossings over a 17-year period. Biol. Invasions 2006, 8:611-630.
38. Murlis J., Elkinton J.S., Cardé R.T. Odor plumes and how insects use them. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1992, 37:505-532.
39. Murlis J., Jones C.D. Fine-scale structure of odour plumes in relation to insect orientation to distant pheromone and other attractant sources. Physiol. Entomol. 1981, 6:71-86.
40. Murlis J., Willis M.A., Cardé R.T. Spatial and temporal structures of pheromone plumes in fields and forests. Physiol. Entomol. 2000, 25:211-222.
41. Perrings C., Dehnen-Schmutz K., Touza J., Williamson M. How to manage biological invasions under globalization. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2005, 20:212-215.
42. Pimentel D. Biological Invasions: Economic and Environmental Costs of Alien Plant, Animal, and Microbe Species 2002, CRC Press, Boca Raton, p. 376.
43. Plant Health Australia PLANTPLAN: Australian Emergency Plant Pest Response Plan. Version 1 2009, Canberra, ACT.
44. Preiss R., Kramer E. Mechanism of pheromone orientation in flying moths. Naturwissenschaften 1986, 73:555-557.
45. Riley J.R., Valeur P., Smith A.D., Reynolds D.R., Poppy G.M., Lofstedt C. Harmonic radar as a means of tracking the pheromone-finding and pheromone-following flight of male moths. J. Insect Behav. 1998, 11:287-296.
46. Sharov A.A., Liebhold A.M., Ravlin F.W. Prediction of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) mating success from pheromone trap counts. Environ. Entomol. 1995, 24:1239-1244.
47. Sharov A.A., Liebhold A.M., Roberts E.A. Methods for monitoring the spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) populations in the Appalachian mountains. J. Econ. Entomol. 1997, 90:1259-1266.
48. Sharov A.A., Liebhold A.M., Roberts E.A. Optimizing the use of barrier zones to slow the spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) in North America. J. Econ. Entomol. 1998, 91:165-174.
49. Stephenson B.P., Gill G.S.C., Randall J.L., Wilson J.A. Biosecurity approaches to surveillance and response for new plant pest species. New Zealand Plant Protection 2003, vol. 56:5-9. The New Zealand Plant Protection Society Inc., Christchurch, New Zealand.
50. Suckling D.M., Gibb A.R., Dentener P.R., Seldon D.S., Clare G.K., Jamieson L., Baird D., Kriticos D.J., El-Sayed A.M. Uraba lugens (Lepidoptera: Nolidae) in New Zealand: pheromone trapping for delimitation and phenology. J. Econ. Entomol. 2005, 98:1187-1192.
51. Tobin P.C., Liebhold A.M., Roberts E.A. Comparison of methods for estimating the spread of a non-indigenous species. J. Biogeogr. 2007, 34:305-312.
52. Vickers N.J., Baker T.C. Flight of Heliothis virescens males in the field in response to sex pheromone. Physiol. Entomol. 1997, 22:277-285.
53. Ward N.L., Masters G.J. Linking climate change and species invasion: an illustration using insect herbivores. Global Change Biol. 2007, 13:1605-1615.
54. Willis M.A., Arbas E.A. Odor-modulated upwind flight of the sphinx moth Manduca sexta L. J. Comp. Physiol. A 1991, 169:427-440.
55. Willis M.A., Cardé R.T. Pheromone-modulated optomotor response in male gypsy moths Lymantria dispar L.: upwind flight in a pheromone plume in different wind velocities. J. Comp. Physiol. A 1990, 167:699-706.
56. Willis M.A., David C.T., Murlis J., Cardé R.T. Effects of pheromone plume structure and visual stimuli on the pheromone-modulated upwind flight of male gypsy moths Lymantria dispar in a forest (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). J. Insect Behav. 1994, 7:385-409.
57. Willis M.A., Murlis W.J., Cardé R.T. Pheromone-mediated upwind flight of male gypsy moths Lymantria dispar, in a forest. Physiol. Entomol. 1991, 16:507-521.
58. Worner S.P. Use of models in applied entomology-the need for perspective. Environ. Entomol. 1991, 20:768-773.
59. Yamanaka T., Tatsuki S., Shimada M. An individual-based model for sex-pheromone-oriented flight patterns of male moths in a local area. Ecol. Model. 2003, 161:35-51.
60. Yang J.G., Zhuang Y.B. An improved ant colony optimization algorithm for solving a complex combinatorial optimization problem. Appl. Soft Comput. 2010, 10:653-660.
61. Zanen P.O., Cardé R.T. Directional control by male gypsy moths of upwind flight along a pheromone plume in three wind speeds. J. Comp. Physiol. A 1999, 184:21-35.