Towards evaluating ontology based data matching strategies: Matching strategies, evaluation methodology and results

2010 4th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science - Proceedings, RCIS 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 137-146

  Tang, Van ^a   Meersman, Robert ^a   Ciuciu, Ioana Georgiana ^a   Leenarts, Ellen ^b   Pudney, Kevin ^c  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

^b BT Group   (United Kingdom)

^c SOCIAL CARE INSTITUTE FOR EXCELLENCE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

E learning; Evaluation methodology; Human resouce mangement; Ontology; Ontology based data matching

Indexed keywords

E-LEARNING;

COMPETENCY MANAGEMENTS; EVALUATION CRITERIA; EVALUATION METHODOLOGIES; EVALUATION RESULTS; HUMAN RESOUCE MANGEMENT; ONTOLOGY-BASED DATA MATCHING;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 77957295212     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/rcis.2010.5507373     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Bhola, H. S. (1989): World trends and issues in adult education. London: Jessica Kingsley; UNESCO. 177 pages, 1853020303, Location: Dallas SIL Library 374 B575w
2. Bhola, H. S. (1990): Evaluating "Literacy for development" projects, programs and campaigns: Evaluation planning, design and implementation, and utilization of evaluation results. Hamburg, Germany: UNESCO Institute for Education; DSE [German Foundation for International Development], 306 pages
3. Blundell, R., and Costa Dias, M. (2000): Evaluation methods for nonexperimental data, Fiscal Studies, Volume 21, Number 4, December 2000, pp. 427-468
4. CDC (2009): Developing Process Evaluation Questions, At the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Healthy Youth, Program Evaluation Resources, httpJlwww.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/ evaluationlresources.htm
5. Cohen, W. W., and Ravikumar, P (2003) Secondstring: An open source java toolkit of approximate string-matching techniques. Project web page, http://secondstring.sourceforge.net.
6. Fellbaum, C. (1999): WordNet: an electronic lexical database, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, ISBN 0-262-06197.
7. Hayes-Roth, F. (1985): Rule-based Systems. In: Communications of the ACM, volume 28, issue 9, pp. 921-932.
8. Huber, F., Herrmann, A., and Gustafson, A. (2007): On the influence of the evaluation methods in conjoint design - some empirical results, in book "Conjoint Measurement", fourth edition, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, ISBN 978-3-540-71403-3, pp. 93-112
9. Jaro, M. A. (1989): Advances in record-linkage methodology as applied to matching the 1985 census of Tampa, Florida. Journal of the American Statistical Association 84:414-420.
10. Jaro, M. A. (1995): Probabilistic linkage of large public health data files (disc: P687-689). Statistics in Medicine 14:491-498.
11. Johnson-Laird, P. N., Byrne, R. M. J., Schaeken, W. (1992): Prepositional Reasoning by Mode/. In: Psychological Review (ISSN: 0033-295X), volume: 99, issue:3, start page: 418.
12. Langmeyer, D. B., Huntington, G. S. (1992): Developing Evaluation Questions, ARCH National Resource Center for Respite and Crisis Care Services, http://www.archrespite.org/archfsI3.htm
13. Meersman, R. (2001): Ontologies and Databases: More than a Fleeting Resemblance, in Proceedings of OES/SEO 2001 Rome Workshop, In, d'Atri, A. & MissikofT, M.,(eds.), Luiss Publications
14. Ovando, M. N. (2001): Teachers' perceptions of a learner-centered teacher evaluation system, journal of personnel evaluation in education, volume 15, Number 3, September 2001, Springer, Netherlands
15. Patton, M. Q. (2002): Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd edition, Sage Publications, Inc, London, UK, ISBN 0-7619-1971-6
16. Ruan, J. and Zhang, W. (2007): Identification and evaluation of jimctional modules in Gene Co-expression Networks, LNCS 4532/2007, in book "Systems Biology and Computational Proteomics", pp. 57-76, Springer Berlin/Heidelberg
17. Sparck Jones, K. (1972): A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval, Journal of Documentation 28 (I): 11-21
18. Spyns, P., Tang, Y. & Meersman, R. (2008), An ontology engineering methodology for DOGMA, Journal of Applied Ontology, Volume 3, Issue 1-2, p.13-39
19. Stufflebeam, D. L., Madaus, G. F., and Kellaghan, T. (2006): Utilization-Focused Evaluation, in book "Evaluation in Education and Human Services", Volume 49, Second edition, Springer, Netherlands, pp. 425-438
20. Tang, Y. and Meersman, R. (2009): SDRule Markup Language: Towards Modeling and Interchanging Ontological Commitments for Semantic Decision Making, Handbook of Research on Emerging RuleBased Languages and Technologies: Open Solutions and Approaches, IGI Publishing, ISBN: 1-60566-402-2, USA, 2009
21. Tang, Y., De Baer, P., Zhao, G., Meersman, R., and Pudney, K. (2009): Towards a Pattern-Driven Topical Ontology Modeling Methodology in Elderly Care Homes, international OntoContent'09 workshop, On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2009 Workshops, Springer, Heidelberg, LNCS 5872, ISBN 978-3-642-05289-7, pp. 514-523, Vilamoura, Portugal, Nov. 1-Nov. 6, 2009
22. Winkler, W. E. (1999) The state of record linkage and current research problems. Statistics of Income Division, Internal Revenue Service Publication R99/04. Available from http://www.census.gov/srd/www/byname.html