Interacting effects of habitat destruction and changing disturbance rates on biodiversity: Who is going to survive?

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 221, Issue 23, 2010, Pages 2776-2783

  dos Santos, Francisca Soares ^a   Johst, Karin ^a   Huth, Andreas ^a   Grimm, Volker ^a  

^a HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Climate change; Colonisation competition trade off; Diversity disturbance curve; Functional type of species; Intermediate disturbance hypothesis

Indexed keywords

AUTOCORRELATED; COLONISATION; COMBINED EFFECT; COMMUNITY MODEL; COMMUNITY STRUCTURES; DIVERSITY-DISTURBANCE CURVE; FUNCTIONAL TYPES; GLOBAL CHANGE; HABITAT DESTRUCTION; INDIVIDUAL-BASED; INTERMEDIATE DISTURBANCE; INTERMEDIATE DISTURBANCE HYPOTHESIS; SEED PRODUCTION; SPATIALLY EXPLICIT;

BIODIVERSITY; COMMERCE; COMPETITION; ECOSYSTEMS; OCEAN HABITATS;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

BIODIVERSITY; COLONIZATION; COMMUNITY RESPONSE; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); DISPERSAL; DISTURBANCE; ENDANGERED SPECIES; GLOBAL CHANGE; GLOBAL WARMING; HABITAT CONSERVATION; HABITAT LOSS; HABITAT TYPE; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; SEED PRODUCTION; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SURVIVAL; TRADE-OFF;

EID: 77957294114     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Banitz T., Huth A., Grimm V., Johst K. Clumped versus scattered: how does the spatial correlation of disturbance events affect biodiversity?. Theoretical Ecology 2008, 1:231-240.
2. Busing R.T. Book review: Forest Dynamics and Disturbance Regimes: Studies from Temperate Evergreen - Deciduous Forests: L.E Frelich 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002, 266 pp., ISBN 0521650828; Forest Ecology and Management 172, 125-126.
3. Cadotte M.W. Competition-colonization trade-offs and disturbance effects at multiple scales. Ecology 2007, 88:823-829.
4. Caswell H., Cohen J.E. Disturbance, interspecific interaction and diversity in metapopulations. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 1991, 42:193-218.
5. Caswell H., Etter R. Cellular automaton models for competition in patchy environments: facilitation, inhibition, and tolerance. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 1999, 61:625-649.
6. Chesson P.L., Warner R.R. Environmental variability promotes coexistence in lottery competitive systems. American Naturalist 1981, 117:923-943.
7. Connell J.H. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 1978, 199:1302-1310.
8. Dytham C. The effect of habitat destruction pattern on species persistence: a cellular model. Oikos 1995, 74:340-344.
9. Fahrig L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 2003, 34:487-515.
10. Forister M.L., Mccall A.C., Sanders N.J., Fordyce J.A., Thorne J.H., O'Brien J., Waetjen D.P., Shapiro A.M. Compounded effects of climate change and habitat alteration shift patterns of butterfly diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2010, 107:2088-2092.
11. Grimm V., Berger U., Bastiansen F., Eliassen S., Ginot V., Giske J., Goss-Custard J., Grand T., Heinz S., Huse G., Huth A., Jepsen J.U., Jørgensen C., Mooij W.M., Müller B., Pe'er G., Piou C., Railsback S.F., Robbins A.M., Robbins M.M., Rossmanith E., Rüger N., Strand E., Souissi S., Stillman R.A., Vabø R., Visser U., DeAngelis D.L. A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models. Ecological Modelling 2006, 198:115-126.
12. Hargrove W.W., Hoffman F.M., Schwartz P.M. A fractal landscape realizer for generating synthetic maps. Conservation Ecology 2002, 6. art-2.
13. Hiebeler D. Populations on fragmented landscapes with spatially structured heterogeneities: landscape generation and local dispersal. Ecology 2000, 81:1629-1641.
14. Higgins S.I., Cain M.L. Spatially realistic plant metapopulation models and the colonization-competition trade-off. Journal of Ecology 2002, 90:616-626.
15. Jakobsson A., Eriksson O. A comparative study of seed number, seed size, seedling size and recruitment in grassland plants. Oikos 2000, 88:494-502.
16. Johst K., Gutt J., Wissel C., Grimm V. Diversity and disturbances in the Antarctic megabenthos: feasible versus theoretical disturbance ranges. Ecosystems 2006, 9:1145-1155.
17. Johst K., Huth A. Testing the intermediate disturbance hypothesis: when will there be two peaks of diversity?. Diversity and Distributions 2005, 11:111-120.
18. Klausmeier C.A. Extinction in multispecies and spatially explicit models of habitat destruction. American Naturalist 1998, 152:303-310.
19. Kneitel J.M., Chase J.M. Trade-offs in community ecology: linking spatial scales and species coexistence. Ecology Letters 2004, 7:69-80.
20. Körner K., Jeltsch F. Detecting general plant functional type responses in fragmented landscapes using spatially-explicit simulations. Ecological Modelling 2008, 210:287-300.
21. Lambin E.F., Turner B.L., Geist H.J., Agbola S.B., Angelsen A., Bruce J.W., Coomes O.T., Dirzo R., Fischer G., Folke C., George P.S., Homewood K., Imbernon J., Leemans R., Li X., Moran E.F., Mortimore M., Ramakrishnan P.S., Richards J.F., Skσnes H., Steffen W., Stone G.D., Svedin U., Veldkamp T.A., Vogel C., Xu J. The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change 2001, 11:261-269.
22. Levins R., Culver D. Regional coexistence of species and competition between rare species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1971, 68:1246-1248.
23. Miller T.E. Community diversity and interactions between the size and frequency of disturbance. The American Naturalist 1982, 120:533-536.
24. Moilanen A., Hanski I. Habitat destruction and coexistence of competitors in a spatially realistic metapopulation model. Journal of Animal Ecology 1995, 64:141-144.
25. Nee S., May R.M. Dynamics of metapopulations: habitat destruction and competitive coexistence. Journal of Animal Ecology 1992, 61:37-40.
26. Peitgen H.O., Saupe D. The Science of Fractal Images 1988, Springer, New York, Ref. Type: Catalog.
27. Roxburgh S.H., Shea K., Wilson J.B. The intermediate disturbance hypothesis: patch dynamics and mechanisms of species coexistence. Ecology 2004, 85:359-371.
28. Sala O.E., Chapin F.S., Armesto J.J., Berlow E., Bloomfield J., Dirzo R., Huber-Sannwald E., Huenneke L.F., Jackson R.B., Kinzig A., Leemans R., Lodge D.M., Mooney H.A., Oesterheld M., Leroy Poff N., Sykes M.T., Walker B.H., Walker M., Wall D.H. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 2000, 287:1770-1774.
29. Saupe D. Algorithms for random fractals. The Science of Fractal Images 1988, 71-136. Springer, New York. H.O. Peitgen, D. Saupe (Eds.).
30. Tilman D. Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 1994, 75:2-16.
31. Tilman D., May R.M., Lehman C.L., Nowak M.A. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 1994, 371:65-66.
32. Travis J.M.J. Climate change and habitat destruction: a deadly anthropogenic cocktail. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 2003, 270:467-473.
33. van der Maarel E. Some remarks on disturbance and its relations to diversity and stability. Journal of Vegetation Science 1993, 4:733-736.
34. Wiegand, T., Revilla, E., Moloney, K.A., 2003. Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population dynamics. Stadler, J., Hensen, I., Klotz, S., Feldmann, H. Biodiversity - from patterns to processes. 33, 50. Göttingen, Die Werkstatt. Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft für Ökologie. Ref Type: Abstract.
35. Zinck R., Johst K., Grimm V. Wildfire, landscape diversity and the Drossel-Schwabl model. Ecological Modelling 2010, 221:98-105.