Public opinion and senate confirmation of Supreme Court nominees

Journal of Politics

Volumn 72, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 767-784

  Kastellec, Jonathan P ^a   Lax, Jeffrey R ^b   Phillips, Justin H ^b  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957288013     PISSN: 00223816     EISSN: 14682508     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0022381610000150     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2. Babington, Charles. 2004. Republican Specter Challenged From the Right. The Washington Post April 7.
3. Bates, Douglas. 2005. Fitting Linear Models in R Using the lme4 Package. R News 5 (1): 27-30.
4. Caldeira, Gregory A. 1988-1989. Commentary on Senate Confirmation of Supreme Court Justices. Kentucky Law Journal 77: 531-538
5. Caldeira, Gregory A., and John R. Wright. 1998. Lobbying for Justice: Organized Interests Supreme Court Nominations, and United States Senate. American Journal of Political Science 42 (2): 499-523. (Pubitemid 128040698)
6. Cameron, Charles M., Albert D. Cover, and Jeffrey A. Segal. 1990. Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees: A NeoinstitutionalModel. American Political Science Review 84 (2): 525-534
7. Clymer, Adam. 1991. After Judging Thomas, Senators Face the Public. The New York Times October 21.
8. Dahl, Robert A. 1957. Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker. Journal of Public Law 6: 279-295
9. Dunne, Finley Peter. 1901. Mr. Dooleys Opinions. New York: R.H. Russell.
10. Epstein, Lee, Rene Lindstadt, Jeffrey A. Segal, and ChadWesterlad. 2006. The Changing Dynamics of Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees. Journal of Politics 68 (2): 296-307. (Pubitemid 43667568)
11. Erikson, Robert S., Gerald C. Wright, and John P. McIver. 1993. Statehouse Democracy Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Flemming, Roy B., and B. Dan Wood. 1997. The Public and the Supreme Court: Individual Justice Responsiveness to American Policy Moods. American Journal of Political Science 41 (2):468-498 (Pubitemid 127046451)
13. Gelman, Andrew. 2008. Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Statistics in Medicine 27: 286-573.
14. Gelman, Andrew, and Jennifer Hill. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel-Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Gelman, Andrew, and Thomas C. Little. 1997. Poststratification into Many Categories Using Hierarchical Logistic Regression. Survey Methodology 23 (2): 127-135
16. Gibson, James L., and Gregory Caldeira. 2009. Confirmation Politics and the Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court: Institutional Loyalty, Positivity Bias, and the Alito Nomination. American Journal of Political Science 53 (1): 139-155
17. Giles, Michael W., Bethany Blackstone, and Richard L. Vining, Jr. 2008. The Supreme Court in American Democracy: Unraveling the Linkages between PublicOpinion and Judicial Decision. Journal of Politics 70 (2): 293-306.
18. Gimpel, James G., and Robin M. Wolpert. 1996. Opinion Holding and Public Attitudes Toward Controversial Supreme Court Nominees. Political Research Quarterly 49 (1): 163-176 (Pubitemid 126048028)
19. Greenburg, Jan Crawford. 2007. Supreme Conflict: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Control of the United States Supreme Court. New York; Penguin Books.
20. Hoekstra, Valeria J. 2000. The Supreme Court and Local Public Opinion. American Political Science Review 94 (1): 89-100.
21. Hutchings, Vincent L. 2001. Political Context, Issue Salience, and Selective Attentiveness: Constituent Knowledge of the Clarence Thomas Confirmation Vote. Journal of Politics 63 (3): 846-868 (Pubitemid 33307011)
22. Johnson, Timothy R., and Jason M. Roberts. 2004. Presidential Capital and the Supreme Court Confirmation Process. Journal of Politics 66 (3): 663-683
23. Lax, Jeffrey R. and Justin H. Phillips. 2009a. Gay Rights in the States: Public Opinion and Policy Responsiveness. American Political Science Review 103 (3). 367-386
24. Lax, Jeffrey R., and Justin H. Phillips. 2009b. How Should We Estimate Public Opinion in the States? American Journal of Political Science 53 (1): 107-121
25. Maltese, John A. 1998. The Selling of Supreme Court Nominees. Baltimore; Johns Hopkins University.
26. Marcus, Ruth. 1987. Growing Array of Groups Fights Bork Confirmation; Many Traditionally Neutral on Judgeships. The Washington Post. September 25.
27. Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28. McGrory, Mary. 1992. Thomas Fallout Begins Out of Chicago. The Washington Post. March 29.
29. Mishler, Mishler, and Reginald S. Sheehan. 1993. The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions. American Political Science Review 87 (1): 87-101.
30. Moraski, Byron J., and Charles R. Shipan. 1999. The Politics of Supreme Court Nominations: A Theory of Institutional Constraints and Choices. American Journal of Political Science 43 (4): 1069-1095
31. Norpoth, Helmut, Jeffrey Segal, William Mishler, and Reginald Sheehan. 1994. Popular Influence on Supreme Court Decisions. American Political Science Review 88 (3): 711-724
32. Overby, L. Marvin, Beth M. Henschen, Julie Strauss, and Michael H. Walsh. 1994. African-American Constituents and Supreme Court Nominees: An Examination of the Senate Confirmation of Thurgood Marshall. Political Research Quarterly 47 (4): 839-855
33. Overby, L. Marvin, Beth M. Henschen, Michael H. Walsh, and Julie Strauss. 1992. Courting Constituents? An Analysis of the Senate Confirmation Vote on Justice Clarence Thomas. American Political Science Review 86 (4): 997-1003.
34. Park, David K., Andrew Gelman, and Joseph Bafumi. 2006. State Level Opinions from National Surveys: Poststratification using Multilevel Regression. Vol.12. Stanford University Press.
35. Poole, Keith T. 1998. Recovering a Basic Space from a Set of Issue Scales. American Journal of Political Science 42 (3): 954-993 (Pubitemid 128092882)
36. Segal, Jeffrey A., and Albert D. Cover. 1989. Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices. American Political Science Review 83 (2): 557-565
37. Segal, Jeffrey A., Albert D. Cover, and Charles M. Cameron. 1988-1989. The Role of Ideology in Senate Confirmation of Supreme Court Justices. Kentucky Law Journal 77: 485-507.
38. Segal, Jeffrey A., Charles M. Cameron, and Albert D. Cover. 1992. A Spatial Model of Roll Call Voting: Senators, Constituents, Presidents and Interest Groups in Supreme Court Confirmations. American Journal of Political Science 36 (1): 96-121.
39. Shipan, Charles R. 2008. Partisanship, Ideology and Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 5 (1): 55-76.
40. Songer, Donald R. 1979. The Relevance of Policy Values for the Confirmation of Supreme Court Nominees. Law and Society Review 13: 927-948
41. Watson, George, and John Stookey. 1995. Shaping America: The Politics of Supreme Court Appointments. New York: HarperCollins.
42. Wolpert, Robin M., and James G Gimpel. 1997. Information, Recall, and Accountability: The Electorates Reponse to the Clarence Thomas Nomination. Legislative Sutides Quarterly 22 (4): 535-550