Predicting success of laparoscopic salpingostomy for ectopic pregnancy

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 116, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 701-707

  Rabischong, Benoit ^a   Larraín, Demetrio ^a   Pouly, Jean Luc ^a   Jaffeux, Patricia ^a   Aublet Cuvelier, Bruno ^a   Fernandez, Hervé ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; CHLAMYDIA; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; HUMAN; INDUCED ABORTION; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; ORAL CONTRACEPTION; POPULATION RESEARCH; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SALPINGITIS; SALPINGOSTOMY; SEROLOGY; SMOKING; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; TREATMENT FAILURE; UTERUS DISEASE; UTERUS SURGERY; VAGINAL DELIVERY; BLOOD; FORECASTING; FRANCE; LAPAROSCOPY; PREGNANCY;

ADULT; CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN; FEMALE; FORECASTING; FRANCE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, ECTOPIC; SALPINGOSTOMY; TREATMENT FAILURE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957264089     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181eeb80f     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Walker JJ. Ectopic pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2007;50: 89-99.
2. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Early diagnosis and management of ectopic preg-nancy. Fertil Steril 2004;82:S146-8.
3. Bruhat M, Manhes H, Choukroun J, Suzanne F. Experimental laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet 1977;72:667-74.
4. Mage G, Manhes H, Pouly JL, Jacquetin B, Bruhat MA. Methods and results of treatment by laparoscopy of tubal pregnancy. A report on 78 cases. Gynecologie 1980;31: 157-61.
5. Bruhat MA, Manhes H, Mage G, Pouly JL. Treatment of ectopic pregnancy by means of laparoscopy. Fertil Steril 1980;33:411-4.
6. Vermesh M, Silva PD, Rosen GF, Stein AL, Fossum GT, Sauer MV. Management of unruptured ectopic gestation by linear salpingostomy: a prospective, randomized trial of laparoscopy versus laparotomy. Obstet Gynecol 1989;73:400-4.
7. Lundorff P, Thorburn J, Hahlin M, Kallfelt B, Lindblom B. Laparoscopic surgery in ectopic pregnancy. A randomized trial versus laparotomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1991;70: 343-8.
8. Murphy AA, Nager CW, Wujek JJ, Kettel LM, Torp VA, Chin HG Operative laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the man agement of ectopic pregnancy: a prospective trial. Fertil Steril 1992;57:1180-5.
9. Gray DT, Thorburn J, Lundorff P, Strandell A, Lindblom B. A cost-effectiveness study of a randomized trial of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy. Lancet 1995;345: 1139-43.
10. Garry R. The laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy; the long road to acceptance. Gynaecol Endosc 1996;5:65-8.
11. Lo L, Pun TC, Chan S. Tubal ectopic pregnancy: an evaluation of laparoscopic surgery versus laparotomy in 614 patients. Aust N ZJ Obstet Gynaecol 1999;39:185-7.
12. Hajenius PJ, Mol F, Mol BW, Bossuyt PM, Ankum WM, van der Veen F. Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 1. Art No.: CD000324. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000324.pub2. (Pubitemid 351820489)
13. Mol BW, Hajenius PJ, Engelsbel S, Ankum WM, Hemrika DJ, van der Veen F, et al. Is conservative surgery for tubal pregnancy preferable to salpingectomy? An economic analy-sis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:834-9.
14. Sherman D, Langer R, Sadovsky G, Bukovsky I, Caspi E. Improved fertility following ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 1982;37:497-502.
15. Pouly JL, Mahnes H, Mage G, Canis M, Bruhat MA. Conser-vative laparoscopic treatment of 321 ectopic pregnancies. Fertil Steril 1986;46:1093-7.
16. Bangsgaard N, Lund CO, Ottesen B, Nilas L. Improved fertility following conservative surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy. BJOG 2003;110:765-70.
17. Seifer DB, Gutmann JN, Doyle MB, Jones EE, Diamond MP, DeCherney AH. Persistent ectopic pregnancy following lapa-roscopic linear salpingostomy. Obstet Gynecol 1990;76: 1121-5.
18. Dwarakanath LS, Mascarenhas L, Penketh RJ, Newton JR. Persistent ectopic pregnancy following conservative surgery for tubal pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103:1021-4.
19. Lund CO, Nilas L, Bangsgaard N, Ottesen B. Persistent ectopic pregnancy after linear salpingotomy: a non-predictable com-plication to conservative surgery for tubal gestation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002;81:1053-9.
20. Coste J, Job-Spira N, Aublet-Cuvelier B, Germain E, Glowac-zower E, Fernandez H, et al. Incidence of ectopic pregnancy. First results of a population-based register in France. Hum Reprod 1994;9:742-5.
21. Coste J, Aublet-Cuvelier B, Bouyer J, Germaine, Job-Spira N. Evaluation of the completeness of the Auvergne register of ectopic pregnancy with the capture-recapture method. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 1995;43(suppl 1):10.
22. Hook EB, Regal RR. The value of capture-recapture methods even for apparent exhaustive surveys. The need for adjustment for source of ascertainment intersection in attempted complete prevalence studies. Am J Epidemiol 1992;135:1060-7.
23. Pouly JL, Chapron C, Manhes H, Canis M, Wattiez A, Bruhat MA. Multifactorial analysis of fertility after conservative lapa-roscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy in a series of 223 patients. Fertil Steril 1991;56:453-60.
24. Parker J, Bisits A. Laparoscopic surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy: salpingectomy or salpingostomy? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;37:115-7.
25. Clausen I. Conservative versus radical surgery for tubal preg-nancy. A review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996;75:8-12.
26. Tuomivaara L, Kauppila A. Radical or conservative surgery for ectopic pregnancy? A follow-up study of fertility of 323 patients. Fertil Steril 1988;50:580-3.
27. dela Cruz A, Cumming DC Factors determining fertility after conservative or radical surgical treatment for ectopic preg-nancy. Fertil Steril 1997;68:871-4.
28. Mol BW, Matthijsse HC, Tinga DJ, Huynh T, Hajenius PJ, Ankum WM, et al. Fertility after conservative and radical surgery for tubal pregnancy. Hum Reprod 1998;13:1804-9.
29. Bouyer J, Job-Spira N, Pouly JL, Coste J, Germain E, Fernandez H. Fertility following radical, conservative-surgical or medical treatment for tubal pregnancy: a population-based study. BJOG 2000;107:714-21.
30. Dubuisson JB, Morice P, Chapron C, De Gayffier A, Mouelhi T. Salpingectomy\the laparoscopic surgical choice for ectopic pregnancy. Hum Reprod 1996;11:1199-203.
31. Seifer DB. Persistent ectopic pregnancy: an argument for heightened vigilance and patient compliance. Fertil Steril 1997;68:402-4.
32. Nathorst-Böös J, Rafik Hamad R. Risk factors for persistent trophoblastic activity after surgery for ectopic pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004;83:471-5.
33. Spandorfer SD, Sawin SW, Benjamin I, Barnhart KT. Postop-erative day 1 serum human chorionic gonadotropin level as a predictor of persistent ectopic pregnancy after conservative surgical management. Fertil Steril 1997;68:430-4.
34. Hagström HG, Hahlin M, Bennegård-Edén B, Sjöblom P, Thornburn J, Lindblom B. Prediction of persistent ectopic pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingostomy. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:798-802.
35. Fujishita A, Khan KN, Kitajima M, Hiraki K, Miura S, Ishimaru T, et al. Re-evaluation of the indication for and limitation of laparoscopic salpingotomy for tubal pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;137:210-6.
36. Seifer DB, Gutmann JN, Grant WD, Kamps CA, DeCherney AH. Comparison of persistent ectopic pregnancy after laparo-scopic salpingostomy versus salpingostomy at laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1993;81:378-82.
37. Billieux MH, Petignat P, Anguenot JL, Campana A, Bischof P. Early and late half-life of human chorionic gonadotropin as a predictor of persistent trophoblast after laparoscopic conserva-tive surgery for tubal pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003;82:550-5.
38. DeCherney AH, Diamond MP. Laparoscopic salpingostomy for ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1987;70:948-50.
39. Courdier S, Garbin O, Hummel M, Thoma V, Ball E, Favre R, et al. Equipment failure: causes and consequences in endo-scopic gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009; 16:28-33.
40. Milad MP, Klein E, Kazer RR. Preoperative serum hCG level and intraoperative failure of laparoscopic linear salpingostomy for ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:373-6.
41. Pearce JA. Electrosurgery. London (UK): Chapman and Hall; 1986.
42. Stock RJ. Persistent tubal pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77: 267-70.
43. Chapron C, Querleu D, Crépin G Laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancies: a one hundred cases study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1991;41:187-90.
44. Tulandi T, Guralnick M. Treatment oftubal ectopic pregnancy by salpingotomy with or without tubal suturing and salpingec-tomy. Fertil Steril 1991;55:53-5.
45. Fujishita A, Masuzaki H, Khan KN, Kitajima M, Hiraki K, Ishimaru T. Laparoscopic salpingotomy for tubal pregnancy: comparison of linear salpingotomy with and without suturing. Hum Reprod 2004;19:1195-200.