Using deprivation indices in regeneration: Does the response match the diagnosis?

Cities

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 476-482

  Greig, Alastair ^a   El Haram, Mohamed ^a   Horner, Malcolm ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Assessment; Community; Deprivation; Regeneration; Urban policy

Indexed keywords

ACTION PLAN; COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; MARKET TRANSITION; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; URBAN POLICY; URBAN RENEWAL;

ENGLAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 77957261336     PISSN: 02642751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2010.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Agger A., Larsen J.N. Exclusion in area-based urban policy programmes. European Planning Studies 2009, 17(7):1085-1099.
2. Atkinson R., Kintrea K. Disentangling area effects: evidence from deprived and non-deprived areas. Urban Studies 2001, 38(12):2277-2298.
3. Bache I., Catney P. Embryonic associationalism: new labour and urban governance. Public Administration 2008, 86(2):411-428.
4. Boddy, M and Parkinson, M (2004) Competitiveness, cohesion and urban governance. In City Matters: Competitiveness, Cohesion and Urban Governance, M Boddy and M Parkinson (eds.), pp. 407-432.
5. Booth P. Partnerships and networks: the governance of urban regeneration in Britain. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 2005, 20:257-269.
6. Bossel, H (1999) Indicators for sustainable development: theory, method, applications: a report to the Balaton group. International Institute for Sustainable Development.
7. Briggs D., Abellan J.J., Fecht D. Environmental inequity in England; small area associations between socio-economic status and environmental pollution. Social Science & Medicine 2008, 67(2008):1612-1629.
8. Bull A., Jones B. Governance and social capital in urban regeneration: a comparison between Bristol and Naples. Urban Studies 2005, 43(4):767-786.
9. Communities and Local Government Transforming Places; Changing Lives: A Framework for Regeneration 2008, Department for Communities and Local Government, London.
10. Communities and Local Government Housing in England 2006/2007 2008, Department for Communities and Local Government, London.
11. Communities and Local Government Transforming Places Changing Lives Taking Forward the Regeneration Framework 2009, Department of Communities and Local Government, London.
12. Communities and Local Government Tracking Neighbourhoods: The Economic Deprivation Index 2008 2009, Department for Communities and Local Government, London.
13. Deakin M., Allwinkle S. A community-based approach to sustainable urban regeneration: the LUDA project. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences 2008, 3(5):91-112.
14. Deakin M., Allwinkle S. Definitional components of the UK sustainable communities plan: the net effect of a realignment and cross-sectional representation of the development and design. Design Principles & Practices: An International Journal 2009, 3:183-196.
15. Deas I., Robson B., Wong C., Bradford M. Measuring neighbourhood deprivation: a critic of the index of multiple deprivation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 2003, 21:883-903.
16. Evans G. Creative cities, creative spaces and urban policy. Urban Studies 2009, 45(5&6):1003-1040.
17. Evans J., Jones P. Rethinking sustainable urban regeneration: ambiguity, creativity, and the shared territory. Environmental and Planning A 2008, 40:1416-1434.
18. Glass, A, McTier, A, and MacGregor, A (2008) Linking opportunity and need: maximising the regeneration benefits from physical investment. Scottish Government Social and Economic Research.
19. Handy S.L., Boarnet M.G., Reid E., Killingsworth R.E. How built environment affects physical activity: views from urban planning. American Journal of Preventative Medicine 2002, 23(2S):64-73.
20. Haywood G., Nicholls G. Enterprise Dynamics in the 20% Most Deprived Wards in England 2004, The Beta Model Ltd.
21. Henderson S., Bowlby S., Raco M. Refashioning local government and inner-city regeneration: the Salford experience. Urban Studies 2007, 44(8):1441-1463.
22. Hill, DM (2000) Urban Policy and Politics in Britain. MacMillan Press Ltd.
23. HM Treasury, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform and Communities and Local Government Review of Sub-national Economic Development and Regeneration 2007, HM Treasury, London.
24. Jones P. Different but the same?. City 2008, 12(3):356-371.
25. Jones P., Evans J. Urban Regeneration in the UK 2008, SAGE Publications Ltd.
26. Kintrea K. Policies and programmes for disadvantaged neighbourhoods: recent English experience. Housing Studies 2006, 22(2):261-282. (March 2007).
27. Lawless P. Area-based urban interventions: rational and outcomes: the new deal for communities programme in England. Urban Studies 2006, 43(11):1991-2011.
28. Lingayah, S and Sommer, F (2001) Communities count: the LITMUS test: reflecting community indicators in the London borough of Southwark. New Economics Foundation.
29. Lyall, S (1997) Blair scolds British 'Workless Class' in outline of welfare plan. New York Times.
30. Mace A., Hall P., Gallent N. New east Manchester; urban renaissance or urban opportunism. European Planning Studies 2007, 15(1):51-65.
31. Macintyre S., Macdonald L., Ellway A. Do poorer people have poorer access to local resources and facilities? The distribution of local resources by area deprivation in Glasgow, Scotland. Social Science & Medicine 2008, 67(2008):900-914.
32. McCarthy J. Partnership, Collaborative Planning and Urban Regeneration 2007, Ashgate.
33. McConnachie, A and Weir, C (2005) Evaluation of statistical techniques in the scottish index of multiple deprivation. Report to the Scottish Executive.
34. McWilliams C. Including the community in local regeneration? The case of greater Pollok social inclusion partnership. Local Economy 2004, 19(3):264-275.
35. Miles N., Tully J. Regional development agency policy to tackle economic exclusion? The role of social capital in distressed communities. Regional Studies 2007, 41:855-866.
36. National Audit Office (2007) Department for communities and local government; housing market renewal. Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, HC 20 Session 2007-2008, 9 November 2007.
37. Noble, M, Firth, D, Dibben, M, Lloyd, M, Smith, G and Wright, G (2001) Meeting on indices of deprivation 2000 organised by Jane Galbraith and Colin Chambers: statement from the Oxford team. Paper Tabled at Discussion Forum on DETR Indices of Deprivation, Royal Statistical Society, London, 11 July 2001.
38. Noble M., Wright G., Smith G., Dibben C. Measuring multiple deprivation at the small-area level. Environmental and Planning A 2006, 38:169-185.
39. Noble M., McLennan D., Wilkinson K., Whitworth A., Barnes H. The English Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2007. Communities and Local Government: London 2008, Social Disadvantage Research Centre, University of Oxford.
40. Noble M., McLennan D., Whitworth A. Tracking Neighbourhoods the Economic Deprivation Index 2008. Communities and Local Government: London 2009, Social Disadvantage Research Centre, University of Oxford.
41. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2004) The Egan review skills for sustainable communities. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
42. Ostrom E. Coping with the tragedies of the commons. Annual Review of Political Science 1999, 2:493-535.
43. Payne R., Maxwell S.R.J. Deprivation-based risk scores: the re-emergence of postcode proscribing in the UK?. Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine 2009, 10:157-160.
44. Pemberton S. Skills to deliver regeneration: building and releasing capacity in the context of Egan: evidence from Merseyside. Planning, Practice & Research 2006, 21(2):267-279. (May 2006).
45. Rees W. Economic development and environmental protection: an ecological economics perspective. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2003, 86:29-45.
46. Robson, B, Deas, I, Bradford, M, Wong, C, and Andersen, M (2002) The London index of multiple deprivation an alternative to the IMD 2000. Greater London Authority.
47. Rogers, R (2005) Towards a strong urban renaissance. An Independent Report by Members of the Urban Task Force.
48. Rydin Y. Indicators as Governmental technology? The lessons of community-based sustainability indicator projects. Environmental and Planning D: Society and Space 2006, 25:610-624.
49. Scottish Executive (2003) The local government in Scotland Act 2003. Scottish Government.
50. Scottish Executive Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation 2006 2006, A Scottish Executive National Statistics Publication.
51. Sharp J., Pollock V., Paddison R. Just art for a just city: public art and social inclusion in urban regeneration. Urban Studies 2005, 42(5/6):1001-1023.
52. Singh R., Murty H.R., Gupta S.K., Dikshit A.K. An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators 2009, 9:189-212.
53. Smith G., Smith T. Mapping deprivation at the local level: recent experience from the United Kingdom. Research Review 2005, 12(2):79-84.
54. Turok I., Bailey N., Atkinson R., Bramley G., Docherty I., Gibb K., Goodlad R., Hastings A., Kintrea K., Kirk K., Leibovitz J., Lever B., Morgan J., Paddison R. Sources of city prosperity and cohesion: the case of Glasgow and Edinburgh. City Matters: Competitiveness, Cohesion and Urban Governance 2004, 13-31. The Policy Press. M. Boddy, M. Parkinson (Eds.).
55. Turok I. The role of planning and development in spatial labour markets. Strategic Planning for Regional Development in the UK 2007, 154-173. Routledge. H. Dimitriou, R. Thomson (Eds.).
56. Valentin A., Spangenberg J.H. A guide to sustainability indicators. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2000, 20:381-392.