Adoption of e-Infrastructure services: Configurations of practice

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Volumn 368, Issue 1926, 2010, Pages 4161-4176

  Voss, Alex ^a   Asgari Targhi, Marzieh ^b   Procter, Rob ^b   Fergusson, David ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

e Infrastructure; Translation into practice; Uptake

Indexed keywords

E-INFRASTRUCTURE; E-INFRASTRUCTURES; E-RESEARCH; INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES; SERVICE PROVIDER; SOCIAL RELATIONS; SUPPORT STAFF; TRANSLATION INTO PRACTICE; UPTAKE;

RESEARCH;

EID: 77957200057     PISSN: 1364503X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0162     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Atkins, D. et al. 2010 Building a UK foundation for the transformative enhancement of research and innovation: report of the international panel for the 2009 review of the UK research councils e-science programme. Swindon, UK: RCUK. See http://www.epsrc.ac.uk/ research/intrevs/escience/Pages/default.aspx.
2. Atkinson, M. P. et al. 2009 Century-of-information research (CIR): a strategy for research and innovation in the century of information. Prometheus 27, 27-45.
3. Beaulieu, A. & Wouters, P. 2009 e-Research as intervention. In e-Research: transformation in scholarly practice (ed. N. W. Jankowski). London, UK: Routledge.
4. Corbyn, Z. 2008 Top 20 secure nearly two thirds of research funds while others are left with nothing. Times Higher Education Supplement, 21 August 2008. See http://www. timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=403263.
5. De Vaus, D. 2001 Research design in social research. London, UK: Sage Publications.
6. Fleck, J. 1988 Innofusion or diffusation? The nature of technological development in robotics. Edinburgh Programme on Information and Communication Technologies (PICT) Working Paper No. 7, Edinburgh University.
7. Fleck, J. 1993 Innofusion: feedback in the innovation process. In Systems science: addressing global issues (eds S. A. Stowell, D. West & J. G. Howell), pp. 169-174. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
8. Fleck, J. 1994 Learning by trying: the implementation of configuration technology. Res. Policy 23, 637-652.
9. Goble, C., Stevens, R., Hull, D., Wolstencroft, K. & Lopez, R. 2008 Data curation + process curation=data integration + science. Brief. bioinform. 9, 506-517. (doi:10.1093/bib/ bbn034)
10. Hartswood, M., Procter, R., Rouncefield, M, Slack, R. & Voss, A. 2008 Co-realisation: evolving IT artefacts by design. In Resources, co-evolution and artefacts (eds M. Ackerman, T. Erickson, C. Halverson & W. Kellogg). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
11. Hey, T., Tansley, S. & Tolle, K. 2009 The fourth paradigm: data-intensive scientific discovery. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Research.
12. Kell, D. B. & Oliver, S. G. 2004 Here is the evidence, now what is the hypothesis? The complementary roles of inductive and hypothesis-driven science in the post-genomic era. BioEssays News Rev. Mol. Cell. Dev. Biol. 26, 99-105. (doi:10.1002/bies.10385)
13. Knorr Cetina, K. D. 1999 Epistemic cultures. How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
14. Lee, C., Dourish, P. & Mark, G. 2006 The human infrastructure of cyberinfrastructure. In Proc. ACM Conf. on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Banff, Alberta, Canada, November, pp. 483-492. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
15. Olson, J. S., Hofer, E., Bos, N., Zimmerman, A., Olson, G. M., Cooney, D. & Faniel, I. 2008 A theory of remote scientific collaboration (TORSC). In Science on the internet (eds G. M. Olson, A. Zimmerman & N. Bos). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Peine, A. 2009 Understanding the dynamics of technological configurations: a conceptual framework and the case of smart homes. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 76, 396-409.
17. Schroeder, R. & Spencer, D. 2009 Social scientists and the domestication of e-research tools. In Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on e-Social Science, Cologne. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester. See http://www.merc.ac.uk/ sites/default/files/events/conference//2009/papers/Schroeder.pdf.
18. Silverstone, R. & Hirsch, E. (eds) 1992 Consuming technologies: media and information in domestic spaces. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
19. Sørensen, K. H. 1994 Technology in use: two essays on the domestication of artifacts. STSarbeidsnotat 2/94, Centre for Technology and Society, University of Trondheim.
20. Stewart, J. & Williams, R. 2005 The wrong trousers? Beyond the design fallacy: social learning and the user. In Critical IT handbook (eds Howcroft et al.), pp. 195-221. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
21. Thew, S., Sutcliffe, A., Procter, R., de Bruin, O., McNaught, J. & Venters, C. 2009 Requirements engineering for e-Science: experiences in epidemiology. IEEE Softw. 26, 80-87.
22. Voss, A. et al. 2007 e-Infrastructure development and community engagement. In Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on e-Social Science, Ann Arbor, US, October. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester. See http://www.merc.ac.uk/sites/ default/files/events/conference/2007/papers/paper170.pdf.
23. Voss, A. et al. 2008 Widening uptake of e-infrastructure services. In Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on e-Social Science, Manchester, UK, June. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester. See http://www. merc.ac.uk/sites/default/files/events/ conference/2008/programme/thurs/1aVoss.htm.
24. Voss, A. et al. 2009 Adoption of e-infrastructure services: inhibitors, enablers and opportunities. In Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on e-Social Science, Cologne, June. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester. See http://www.merc.ac.uk/sites/default/files/events/conference//2009/papers/ Voss.pdf.
25. Williams R. & Edge D. 1996 The social shaping of technology. Res. Policy 25, 865-899.
26. Williams, R., Stewart, J. & Slack, R. 2005 Social learning in technological innovation: experimenting with information and communication technologies. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.