Climatic adaptation in an isolated and genetically impoverished amphibian population

Ecography

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 730-737

  Orizaola, Germán ^a   Quintela, María ^a,b   Laurila, Anssi ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF A CORUÑA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; AMPHIBIAN; CLIMATE CONDITIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; GENETIC VARIATION; GROWING SEASON; GROWTH RATE; ISOLATED POPULATION; LARVA; LATITUDINAL GRADIENT; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; TEMPERATURE PROFILE;

SWEDEN;

AMPHIBIA; ANURA; RANA LESSONAE;

EID: 77957165346     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06033.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Allendorf F W, Luikart G. Conservation and the genetics of populations 2007, Blackwell
2. Angilletta M J. Tradeoffs and the evolution of thermal reaction norms. Trends Ecol. Evol 2003, 18:234-240.
3. Angilletta M J. Temperature, growth, and body size in ectotherms: fitting pieces of a life-history puzzle. Integr. Comp. Biol 2004, 44:498-509.
4. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 16th ed 1985, American Public Health Association
5. Arendt J D. Adaptive intrinsic growth rates: an integration across taxa. Q. Rev. Biol 1997, 72:149-177.
6. Arnett A E, Gotelli N J. Geographic variation in life-history traits of the ant lion, Myrmeleon immaculatus: evolutionary implications of Bergman's rule. Evolution 1999, 53:1180-1188.
7. Ashton K G. Sensitivity of intraspecific latitudinal clines of body size for tetrapods to sampling, altitude and body size. Integr. Comp. Biol 2004, 44:403-412.
8. Atkinson D. Ectotherm life-history responses to developmental temperature. Animals and temperature: phenotypic and evolutionary adaptation 1996, 183-204. Johnston I ABenett A F. Cambridge Univ. Press
9. Ayres M P, Scriber J M. Local adaptation to regional climates in Papilio canadensis (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Ecol. Monogr 1994, 64:465-482.
10. Berven K A. Countergradient selection in the green frog, Rana clamitans. Evolution 1979, 33:609-623.
11. Blanckenhorn W U, Demont M. Bergmann and converse Bergmann latitudinal clines in arthropods: two ends of a continuum? Integr. Comp. Biol 2004, 44:413-424.
12. Bridle J R, Vines T H. Limits to evolution at range margins: when and why does adaptation fail? Trends Ecol. Evol 2007, 22:140-147.
13. Buckley J, Foster J. Reintroduction strategy for the pool frog Rana lessonae in England 2005, English Nature Research report 642
14. Burger R, Lynch M. Evolution and extinction in a changing environment - a quantitative-genetic analysis. Evolution 1995, 49:151-163.
15. Conover D O, Schultz E T. Phenotypic similarity and the evolutionary significance of countergradient variation. Trends Ecol. Evol 1995, 10:248-252.
16. Frankham R. Conservation genetics. Annu. Rev. Genet 1995, 29:305-327.
17. Frankham R. Genetics and extinction. Biol. Conserv 2005, 126:131-140.
18. The 2005 red list of Swedish species 2005, Gärdenfors U. ArtDatabanken Sweden
19. Gosner K N. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 1960, 16:183-190.
20. Hampe A, Petit R J. Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters. Ecol. Lett 2005, 8:461-467.
21. Hoffmann A A. Low potential for climatic stress adaptation in a rainforest Drosophila species. Science 2003, 301:100-102.
22. Jakobsson A, Dinnetz P. Local adaptation and the effects of isolation and population size - the semelparous perennial Carlina vulgaris as a study case. Evol. Ecol 2005, 19:449-466.
23. James A C, Partridge L. Thermal evolution of rate of larval development in Drosophila melanogaster in laboratory and field populations. J. Evol. Biol 1995, 8:315-330.
24. Kellermann V. Very low additive genetic variance and evolutionary potential in multiple populations of two rainforest Drosophila species. Evolution 2006, 60:1104-1108.
25. 2005 års inventering av gölgroda längs Nordupplands kustband samt utvärdering av gölgrodans åtgärdsprogram 2007, Länsstyrelsen i Uppsala län, in Swedish, Länsstyrelsens meddelandeserie 2007: 1
26. Laugen A T. Latitudinal countergradient variation in the common frog (Rana temporaria) development rates-evidence for local adaptation. J. Evol. Biol 2003, 16:996-1005.
27. Laurila A. Population divergence in growth rate and antipredator defences in Rana arvalis. Oecologia 2006, 147:585-595.
28. Laurila A. Antipredator defenses along a latitudinal gradient in Rana temporaria. Ecology 2008, 89:1399-1413.
29. Lesica P, Allendorf F W. When are peripheral populations valuable for conservation? Conserv. Biol 1995, 9:753-760.
30. Levins R. Thermal acclimation and heat resistance in Drosophila species. Am. Nat 1969, 193:483-499.
31. Levinton J S. The latitudinal compensation hypothesis: growth data and a model of latitudinal growth differentiation based upon energy budgets. I. Interspecific comparison of Ophryotrocha pueriles (Polychaeta: Dorvilleidae). Biol. Bull 1983, 165:686-698.
32. McKay J K. Local adaptation across a climatic gradient despite small effective population size in the rare sapphire rockcress. Proc. R. Soc. B 2001, 268:1715-1721.
33. Orizaola G, Laurila A. Microgeographic variation in temperature-induced plasticity in an isolated amphibian population. Evol. Ecol 2009, 23:979-991.
34. Räsänen K, Kruuk L E B. Maternal effects and evolution at ecological time scales. Funct. Ecol 2007, 21:408-421.
35. Räsänen K, Hendry A P. Disentangling interactions between adaptive divergence and gene flow when ecology drives diversification. Ecol. Lett 2008, 11:624-636.
36. Räsänen K. Geographic variation in acid stress tolerance of the moor frog, Rana arvalis. I. Local adaptation. Evolution 2003, 57:352-362.
37. Reed D H, Frankham R. Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conserv. Biol 2003, 17:230-237.
38. Schultz E T. Countergradient variation in growth among newly hatched Fundulus heteroclitus: geographic differences revealed by common-environment experiments. Funct. Ecol 1996, 10:366-374.
39. Sinsch U. Thermal influences on the habitual preference and the diurnal activity in three European Rana species. Oecologia 1984, 64:125-131.
40. Sjögren P. Genetic variation in relation to demography of periphereal pool frog populations (Rana lessonae). Evol. Ecol 1991, 5:248-271.
41. Sjögren P, Berg L M. Allozyme variation as a demographic predictor at high latitudes: the moor frog and the pool frog at 60°N. Hereditas 1999, 130:317-323.
42. Sjögren P. Thermal preferences in the pool frog Rana lessonae: impact on the reproductive behaviour of a northern fringe population. Holarct. Ecol 1988, 11:178-184.
43. Smith J N M, Keller L F. Genetics and demography of small populations. Conservation and biology of small populations: the song sparrows of Mandarte Island 2006, 3-15. Smith J N M, Oxford Univ. Press
44. Snell C. Phylogeography of the pool frog (Rana lessonae Camerano) in Europe: evidence for native status in Great Britain and for an unusual postglacial colonization route. Biol. J. Linn. Soc 2005, 85:41-51.
45. Tegelström H, Sjögren-Gulve P. Genetic differentiation among northern European pool frog (Rana lessonae) populations. Herpetol. J 2004, 14:187-193.
46. Thomas C D. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 2004, 427:145-148.
47. Tietje G A, Reyer H-U. Larval development and recruitment of juveniles in a natural population of Rana lessonae and Rana esculenta. Copeia 2004, 2004:638-646.
48. Willi Y. Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst 2006, 37:433-458.
49. Willi Y. Genetic isolation of fragmented populations is exacerbated by drift and selection. J. Evol. Biol 2007, 20:534-542.
50. Yamahira K, Conover D O. Intra- vs interspecific latitudinal variation in growth: adaptation to temperature or seasonality? Ecology 2002, 83:1252-1262.
51. Yamahira K, Takeshi K. Variation in juvenile growth rates among and within latitudinal populations of the medaka. Popul. Ecol 2008, 50:3-8.
52. Zeisset I, Beebee T J C. RAPD identification of north European water frogs. Amphib. Reptilia 1998, 19:163-170.
53. Zeisset I, Beebee T J C. Determination of biogeographical range: an application of molecular phylogeography to the European pool frog Rana lessonae. Proc. R. Soc. B 2001, 268:933-938.