Psychometric evaluation of the Dutch version of the Mood, Interest and Pleasure Questionnaire (MIPQ)

Research in Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1652-1658

  Petry, Katja ^a   Kuppens, Sofie ^a   Vos, Pieter ^a   Maes, Bea ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

People with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities; Psychometric evaluation; Quality of life

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTELLECTUAL IMPAIRMENT; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; LETHARGY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOOD INTEREST AND PLEASURE QUESTIONNAIRE; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; PSYCHOMETRY; PSYCHOSOCIAL WITHDRAWAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VALIDITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFFECT; AGED; FEMALE; HAPPINESS; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MENTAL RETARDATION; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957165277     PISSN: 08914222     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.04.011     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Aman M.G., Singh N.N., Stewart A.W., Field C.J. Psychometric characteristics of the Aberrant Behavior Checklist. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 1985, 89:492-502.
2. Aman M.G. Annotated bibliography on the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) 2002, Aman, Washington, DC.
3. Aman M., Singh N.N. Aberrant behavior checklist manual 1986, Slosson Educational Publications, New York.
4. Borthwick-Duffy S.A. Quality of life of persons with severe or profound mental retardation. Quality of life. Perspective and issues 1990, AAMR, Washington. R.L. Schalock, M.J. Begab (Eds.).
5. Brown E.C., Aman M.G., Havercamp S.M. Factor analysis and norms for parent ratings on the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community for young people in special education. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2002, 23:45-60.
6. Browne M.W., Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Testing structural equation models 1993, 136-162. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA. K.A. Bollen, J.S. Long (Eds.).
7. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2nd ed.
8. Cummins R.A. Moving from the quality of life concept to a theory. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2005, 49:699-706.
9. Cummins R.A. The second approximation to an international standard for life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research 1998, 43:307-334.
10. Diener E. Assessing subjective well-being - progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research 1994, 31:103-157.
11. Diener E., Scollon C., Lucas R. The evolving nature of subjective well-being: The multifaceted nature of happiness. Advances in Cell Aging and Gerontology 2003, 15:187-219.
12. Fredrickson B., Cohn M. The psychophysiology of emotion. Handbook of emotions 2008, 777-796. The Guilford Press, New York. 3rd ed. M. Lewis, J. Haviland-Jones, L. Feldman Barret (Eds.).
13. Goode D., Hogg J. Towards an understanding of holistic quality of life in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Quality of life for persons with disabilities: International perspectives and issues 1994, 197-207. Brookline, Cambridge, MA. D. Goode (Ed.).
14. Heal L.W., Sigelman C.K. Methodological issues in quality of life measurement. Quality of life: Vol. 1. Conceptualization and measurement 1996, 91-104. American Association on Mental Retardation, Washington. R.L. Schalock (Ed.).
15. Hu L., Bentler P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 1999, 6:1-55.
16. Lowry M.A. Assessment and treatment of mood disorders in persons with developmental disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 1998, 10:387-405.
17. Lyons, G. (2003). Life satisfaction for children with profound multiple disabilities. Unpublished PhD Thesis. The University of Newcastle, New Castle.
18. Lyons G. The Life Satisfaction Matrix: An instrument and procedure for assessing the subjective quality of life of individuals with profound multiple disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2005, 49:766-769.
19. McVilly K., Burton-Smith R., Davidson J. Concurrence between subject and proxy ratings of quality of life for people with and without intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 2000, 25:19-40.
20. Nakken H., Vlaskamp C. A Need for a taxonomy for profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 2007, 4:83-87.
21. Nunnally J.C., Bernstein I.H. Psychometric theory 1994, McGraw-Hill, New York. 3rd ed.
22. Ouellette-Kuntz H., McCreary B. Quality of life assessment for persons with severe developmental disabilities. Qualitity of life in health promotion and rehabilitation 1996, 268-278. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. R. Renwick, I. Brown, M. Nagler (Eds.).
23. Paclawskyj T.R., Matson J.L., Bamburg J.W., Baglio C.S. A comparison of the Diagnostic Assessment for the Severely Handicapped-II (DASH-II) and the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC). Research in Developmental Disabilities 1997, 18(4):289-298.
24. Petry K., Maes B., Vlaskamp C. Domains of quality of life of people with profound multiple disabilities: The perspective of parents and direct support staff. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 2005, 18:35-46.
25. Petry K., Maes B. Description of the support needs of people with profound multiple disabilities using the 2002 AAMR system: An overview of literature. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities 2007, 42(2):130-143.
26. Petry K., Maes B., Vlaskamp C. Operationalizing quality of life for people with profound multiple disabilities: A Delphi study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2007, 51(5):334-349.
27. Petry K., Maes B., Vlaskamp C. Measuring the quality of life of people with profound multiple disabilities using the QOL-PMD: First results. Research in Developmental Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal 2009, 30:1394-1405.
28. Rapley M., Ridgeway J., Beyer S. Staff:Staff and staff: Client reliability of the Schalock & Keith (1993) Quality of Life Questionnaire. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 1998, 42:37-42.
29. Robinson M.D., Johnson J.T., Shields S.A. The gender heuristic abd the database: Factors affecting the perception of gender-related differences in the experience and display of emotions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 1998, 20:206-219.
30. Rosenberg E.L. Levels of analysis and the reorganization of affect. Review of General Psychology 1998, 2:247-270.
31. Ross E., Oliver C. Preliminary analysis of the psychometric properties of the Mood, Interest & Pleasure Questionnaire (MIPQ) for adults with severe and profound learning disabilities. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 2003, 42:81.
32. Schalock R.L., Felce D. Quality of life and subjective well-being: Conceptual and measurement issues. International handbook of applied research in intellectual disabilities 2004, John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex. E. Emmerson, C. Hatton, T. Thompson, T. Parmenter (Eds.).
33. Schalock R.L., Brown I., Brown R., Cummins R.A., Felce D., Matikka L., et al. Conceptualization, measurement, and application of quality of life for persons with intellectual disabilities: Report of an International Panel of Experts. Mental Retardation 2002, 40:457-470.
34. Scollon C.N., Howard A.H., Caldwell A.E., Ito S. The role of ideal affect in the experience and memory of emotions. Journal of Happiness Studies 2009, 10:257-269.
35. Seifert M., Fornefeld B., Koenig B. Zeilperspektive Lebensqualität. Eine Studie zur Lebenssituation von Menschen mit schwerer Behinderung im Heim 2001, Bielefeld, Bethel-Verlag.
36. Selai C., Rosser R.M. Good quality quality? Some methodological issues. Journal of Social Medicine 1993, 86:440-443.
37. Sharma S. Applied Multivariate Techniques 1995, John Wiley, New York.
38. Stancliffe R. Proxy respondents and quality of life. Evaluation and Program Planning 2000, 23:89-93.
39. Streiner D.L., Norman G.R. Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use 1995, Oxford University Press, Oxford. 2nd ed.
40. Sturmey P., Bertman L.J. The validity of the Reiss Screen for Maladaptive Behavior. American Journal on Mental Retardation 1994, 99:201-206.
41. Verdugo M.A., Schalock R.L., Keith K.D., Stancliffe R.J. Quality of life and its measurement: Important principles and guidelines. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2005, 49:707-717.
42. Vos, P., De Cock, P., Petry, K., Van den Noortgate, W., & Maes, B. (2010). Do you know what I feel? A first step towards a non-interpretative measurement of the subjective well-being of persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, doi:10.1111/j.1468-3148.2010.00553.x.