Reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses: Asking authors, peer reviewers, editors and funders to do better;Revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis: la responsabilidad de los autores, revisores, editores y patrocinadores

Medicina Clinica

Volumn 135, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 505-506

  Moher, David ^a   Liberati, Alessandro ^b,c  

^a OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b MARIO NEGRI INSTITUTE FOR PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITOR; EDITORIAL; FUNDING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PEER REVIEW;

EID: 77957162522     PISSN: 00257753     EISSN: 15788989     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2010.02.016     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. D.G. Altman, I. Simera, J. Hoey, D. Moher, and K. Schulz EQUATOR: Reporting guidelines for health research Lancet 371 2008 1149 1150
2. Hopewell S, Dutton S, Yu LM, Chan AW, Altman DG. The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: Comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed. BMJ. 2010;340:c723
3. D. Moher, J. Tetzlaff, A. Tricco, M. Sampson, and D.G. Altman Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews PLoS Med 4 2007 e78
4. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Randomized controlled trials 3 registration/application checklist (12/2006) 2006 [consultado 1/2/2010]. Disponible en: www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/documents/rct-reg-e.pdf
5. P. Glasziou, E. Meats, C. Heneghan, and S. Shepperd What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? BMJ 336 2008 1472 1474
6. J. Wen, Y. Ren, L. Wang, Y. Li, Y. Liu, and M. Zhou The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: A random sampling study J Clin Epidemiol 61 2008 770 775
7. D. Moher Reporting research results: A moral obligation for all researchers Can J Anaesth 54 2007 331 335
8. D. Moher, D.J. Cook, S. Eastwood, I. Olkin, D. Rennie, D. Stroup for the QUOROM group Improving the quality of reporting of meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: The QUOROM statement Lancet 354 1999 1896 1900
9. D. Moher, K.F. Schulz, I. Simera, and D.G. Altman Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines PLoS Med 7 2 2010 e1000217
10. A. Liberati, D.G. Altman, J. Tetzlaff, C. Mulrow, P. Gøtzsche, J.P. Ioannidis and the PRISMA Group The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration PLoS Med 6 2009 e1000100 Epub 2009 Jul 21
11. G. Urrútia, and X. Bonfill Declaración PRISMA: una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis Med Clin(Barc) 135 2010 507 511
12. E.P. Whitlock, J.S. Lin, R. Chou, P. Shekelle, and K.A. Robinson Using existing systematic reviews in complex systematic reviews Ann Intern Med 148 2008 776 782
13. J.P. Ioannidis Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: A primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses CMAJ 181 2009 488 493
14. A.C. Plint, D. Moher, A. Morrison, K.F. Schulz, D.G. Altman, and C. Hill Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials: A systematic review Med J Aust 185 2006 263 267
15. N. Smidt, A.W. Rutjes, D.A. Van der Windt, R.W. Ostelo, P.M. Bossuyt, and J.B. Reitsma The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: Has it improved? Neurology 67 2006 792 797
16. S.L. Prady, S.J. Richmond, V.M. Morton, and H. MacPherson A systematic evaluation of the impact of STRICTA and CONSORT recommendations on quality of reporting for acupuncture trials PLoS ONE 3 2008 e1577
17. A. Delaney, S.M. Bagshaw, A. Ferland, B. Manns, and K.B. Laupland A 34 systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature Crit Care 9 2005 R575 R582
18. Moher D, Simera I, Schulz K, Miller D, Grimshaw J. Reporting guidelines for clinical research: A systematic review. 6th International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication, 12 de septiembre de 2009, Vancouver.
19. S. Hopewell, D.G. Altman, D. Moher, and K.F. Schulz Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact factor medical journals: A survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors' Trials 9 2008 20
20. Chan AW, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Gøtzsche P, Hrbjartsson A, Krlea-Jeri′c K, et al. The SPIRIT Initiative: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Randomized Trials. 6th International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication, 12 de septiembre de 2009, Vancouver