Wind and mechanical stimuli differentially affect leaf traits in Plantago major

New Phytologist

Volumn 188, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 554-564

  Anten, Niels P R ^a   Alcalá Herrera, Rafael ^a,b   Schieving, Feike ^a   Onoda, Yusuke ^a,c  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CÓRDOBA   (Spain)

^c KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Leaf anatomy; Leaf functional traits; Phenotypic plasticity; Thigmomorphogenesis; Wind

Indexed keywords

AIRFLOW; ANATOMY; BIOMASS ALLOCATION; BIOMECHANICS; DICOTYLEDON; FLORAL TRAIT; GROWTH RESPONSE; HEAT FLUX; LEAF; MECHANICAL PROPERTY; MORPHOLOGY; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; TRANSPIRATION; WIND VELOCITY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; MECHANICAL STRESS; PLANT LEAF; PLANTAGO; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; WIND;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; PLANT LEAVES; PLANTAGO; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; WIND;

PLANTAGO; PLANTAGO MAJOR;

EID: 77957156871     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03379.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Anten NPR, Casado-Garcia R, Nagashima H. Effects of mechanical stress and plant density on mechanical characteristics, growth and lifetime reproduction of tobacco plants. American Naturalist 2005, 166:650-660.
2. Anten NPR, Pawlowski M, vonWettberg E, Huber H. Interactive effects of spectral shading and mechanical stress on the expression and costs of shade avoidance. American Naturalist 2009, 173:241-255.
3. Biro RL, Hunt ER, Erner Y, Jaffe MJ. Thigmomorphogenesis: changes in cell division and elongation in the internodes of mechanically-perturbed or ethrel-treated bean plants. Annals of Botany 1980, 45:655-664.
4. Braam J. In touch: plant responses to mechanical stimuli. New Phytologist 2005, 165:373-389.
5. Bradshaw AD. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Advances in Genetics 1965, 13:115-155.
6. Cipollini DF. Wind-induced mechanical stimulation increases pers resistance in common bean. Oecologia 1997, 111:84-90.
7. Cipollini DF. Costs to flowering of the production of a mechanically hardened phenotype in Brassica napus L. International Journal of Plant Sciences 1999, 160:735-741.
8. Cordero RA. Ecophysiology of Cecropia schreberiana saplings in two wind regimes in an elfin cloud forest: growth, gas exchange, architecture and stem biomechanics. Tree Physiology 1999, 19:53-163.
9. Ennos AR. Wind as an ecological factor. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 1997, 12:108-111.
10. Fluch S, Olmo CC, Tauber S, Stierschneider M, Kopecky D, Reichenauer TG, Matusikova I. Transcriptomic changes in wind-exposed poplar leaves are dependent on developmental stage. Planta 2008, 228:757-764.
11. Goodman AM, Ennos AR. A comparative study of the response of the roots and shoots of sunflower and maize to mechanical stimulation. Journal of Experimental Botany 1996, 47:1499-1507.
12. Grace J. Plant responses to wind 1977, London, UK, Academic Press
13. Henry HAL, Thomas SC. Interactive effects of lateral shade and wind on stem allometry, biomass allocation and mechanical stability in Abutilon theophrasti (Malvaceae). American Journal of Botany 2002, 89:1609-1615.
14. Jaffe MJ. Thigmomorphogenesis: the response of plant growth and development to mechanical stimulation. Planta 1973, 114:143-157.
15. Jaffe MJ, Forbes S. Thigmomorphogenesis: the effect of mechanical perturbation on plants. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 1993, 12:313-324.
16. Kuiper PJC, Bos M. Plantago: a multidisciplinary study 1992, Ecology Studies, Vol. 89, Berlin, Germany, Springer Verlag
17. Lambers H, Chapin FS, Pons TL. Plant physiological ecology 1998, Springer Verlag, New York, USA
18. Lawton RO. Wind stress and elfin stature in a montane forest tree: an adaptive explanation. American Journal of Botany 1982, 69:1224-1230.
19. Liu Y, Schieving F, Stuefer JF, Anten NPR. The effects of mechanical stress and spectral shading on the growth and allocation of ten genotypes of a stoloniferous plant. Annals of Botany 2007, 99:121-130.
20. Lytle DH, Poff NL. Adaptation to natural flow regimes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2004, 19:94-100.
21. Marshal B, Biscoe PV. A model for C3 leaves describing the dependence of net photosynthesis on irradiance. Journal of Experimental Botany 1980, 31:29-39.
22. McArthur C, Bradshaw OS, Jordan GJ, Clissold FJ, Pile AJ. Wind affects morphology, function and chemistry of eucalypt tree seedlings. International Journal of Plant Sciences 2010, 17:73-80.
23. Niinemets U, Fleck S. Petiole mechanics, leaf inclination morphology and investment in support in relation to light availability in the canopy of Liriodendron tulipifera. Oecologia 2002, 132:21-33.
24. Niklas KJ. Plant biomechanics: an engineering approach to plant form and function 1992, Chicago, IL, USA, University of Chicago Press
25. Niklas KJ. Differences between Acer saccharum leaves from open and wind-protected sites. Annals of Botany 1996, 78:61-66.
26. Niklas KJ. Effects of vibration on mechanical properties and biomass allocation pattern of Capsella bursa-pastoris (Cruciferae). Annals of Botany 1998, 82:147-156.
27. Nomura N, Setoguchi H, Takaso T. Functional consequences of stenophylly for leaf productivity: comparison of the anatomy and physiology of a rheophyte, Farfugium japonicum var. Luchuence, and a related non-rheophyte, F. japonicum (Asteraceae). Journal of Plant Research 2006, 119:645-656.
28. Onoda Y, Schieving F, Anten NPR. Effect of light and nutrient availabilities on leaf mechanical properties. Annals of Botany 2008, 101:727-736.
29. Read J, Sanson GD. Characterizing sclerophylly: the mechanical properties of a diverse range of leaf types. New Phytologist 2003, 160:81-99.
30. Read J, Stokes A. Plant biomechanics in an ecological context. American Journal of Botany 2006, 93:1546-1565.
31. Retuerto R, Woodward FI. Effects of wind speed on growth and biomass allocation of white mustard Sinapis alba. Oecologia 1992, 92:113-123.
32. Sack L, Melcher PJ, Zwieniecki MA, Holbrook NM. The hydraulic conductance of the angiosperm leaf lamina: a comparison of three measurement methods. Journal of Experimental Botany 2002, 53:2177-2184.
33. Selaya NG, Anten NPR, Mathies M, Oomen RJ, Werger MJA. Above-ground biomass investments and light interception of tropical forest trees early in succession. Annals of Botany 2007, 99:141-151.
34. Smith VC, Ennos AR. The effects of air flow and stem flexure on the mechanical and hydraulic properties of the stems of sunflowers Helianthus annuus L. Journal of Experimental Botany 2003, 54:845-849.
35. Speck O. Field measurements of wind speed and reconfiguration in Arundo donax (Poaceae) with estimates of drag forces. American Journal of Botany 2003, 90:1253-1256.
36. Telewski FW. Growth, wood density and ethylene production in response to mechanical perturbation in Pinus taeda. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1990, 20:1277-1282.
37. Telewski F. Wind induced physiological and developmental responses in trees. Wind and trees 1995, 237-263. Coutts MPGrace J. eds, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press
38. Telewski FW, Pruyn ML. Thigmomorphogenesis: a dose response to flexing in Ulmus americana L. seedlings. Tree Physiology 1998, 18:65-68.
39. Vogel S. Life in moving fluids 1994, Princeton, NJ, USA, Princeton University Press
40. Wainwright SA, Biggs WD, Currey JD, Gosline JM. Mechanical design in organisms 1976, Princeton, NJ, USA, Princeton University Press
41. Wilson J. Microscopic features of wind damage to leaves of Acer pseudoplatanus L. Annals of Botany 1984, 53:73-82.