Association of DEA super-efficiency estimates with financial ratios: Investigating the case for Chinese banks

Omega

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 323-334

  Avkiran, Necmi K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Benchmarking; DEA; Financial ratios; Profitability

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957153586     PISSN: 03050483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2010.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ahmad R, Ariff M, Skully M. Factors determining mergers of banks in Malaysia's banking sector reform. Multinational Finance Journal 2007, 11:1-31.
2. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 1978, 2:429-444.
3. Sherman HD, Gold F. Bank branch operating efficiency: evaluation with data envelopment analysis. Journal of Banking & Finance 1985, 9:297-315.
4. Parkan C. Measuring the efficiency of service operations: an application to bank branches. Engineering Costs and Production Economics 1987, 12:237-242.
5. Vassiloglou M, Giokas D. A study of the relative efficiency of bank branches: an application of data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 1990, 41:591-597.
6. Thanassoulis E, Boussofiane A, Dyson RG. A comparison of data envelopment analysis and ratio analysis as tools for performance assessment. OMEGA International Journal of Management Science 1996, 24:229-244.
7. Chen X, Skully M, Brown K. Banking efficiency in China: application of DEA to pre- and post-deregulation eras: 1993-2000. China Economic Review 2005, 16:229-245.
8. Drake L, Hall MJB Simper R. The impact of macroeconomic and regulatory factors on bank efficiency: a non-parametric analysis of Hong Kong's banking system. Journal of Banking & Finance 2006, 30:1443-1466.
9. Cooper WW, Ruefli TW, Deng H, Wu J, Zhang Z. Are state-owned banks less efficient? a long- vs. short-run data envelopment analysis of chinese banks. International Journal of Operational Research 2008, 3:533-556.
10. Laurenceson J, Qin F. Has minority foreign investment in China's banks improved their cost efficiency?. China & World Economy 2008, 16:57-74.
11. Avkiran NK, Morita H. Benchmarking firm performance from a multiple-stakeholder perspective with an application to Chinese banking. OMEGA, The International Journal of Management Science 2010, 38:501-508.
12. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. Evaluating program and managerial efficiency: an application of data envelopment analysis to program follow through. Management Science 1981, 27:668-697.
13. Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K. Data Envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications. References and DEA-Solver Software 2007, Springer, New York. 2nd edition.
14. Avkiran NK, Rowlands T. How to better identify the true managerial performance: State of the art using DEA. OMEGA, The International Journal of Management Science 2008, 36:317-324.
15. Andersen P, Petersen NC. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 1993, 39:1261-1264.
16. Cook WD, Liang L, Zha Y, Zhu J. A modified super-efficiency DEA model for infeasibility. Journal of the Operational Research Society 2009, 60:276-281.
17. Tone Kaoru A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 2001, 130:498-509.
18. Tone K. A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 2002, 143:32-41.
19. Yeh QJ. The application of data envelopment analysis in conjunction with financial ratios for bank performance evaluation. Journal of Operational Research Society 1996, 47:980-988.
20. KPMG. Financial Institutions Performance Survey, 2009, Australia.
21. Sherman HD, Zhu J. Benchmarking with quality-adjusted DEA (Q-DEA) to seek lower-cost high-quality service: evidence from a US bank application. Annals of Operations Research 2006, 145:301-319.
22. Elyasiani E, Mehdian S, Rezvanian R. An empirical test of association between production and financial performance: the case of the commercial banking industry. Applied Financial Economics 1994, 4:55-59.
23. Sathye M. Technical efficiency of large bank production in Asia and the Pacific. Multinational Finance Journal 2005, 9:1-22.
24. Kao C, Liu ST. Predicting bank performance with financial forecasts: a case of Taiwan commercial banks. Journal of Banking & Finance 2004, 28:2353-2368.
25. Avkiran NK, Morita H. Predicting Japanese bank stock performance with a composite relative efficiency metric: a new investment tool. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 2010, 18(3):254-271.
26. Sealey CW, Lindley James T. Inputs, outputs, and a theory of production and cost at depository financial institutions. Journal of Finance 1977, 32:1251-1266.
27. Havrylchyk O. Efficiency of the Polish banking industry: foreign versus domestic banks. Journal of Banking & Finance 2006, 30:1975-1996.
28. Miller SM, Noulas AG. The technical efficiency of large bank production. Journal of Banking & Finance 1996, 20:495-509.
29. Bhattacharyya A, Lovell CAK, Sahay P. The impact of liberalization on the productive efficiency of Indian commercial banks. European Journal of Operational Research 1997, 98:332-345.
30. Brockett PL, Charnes A, Cooper WW, Huang ZM, Sun DB. Data transformations in DEA cone ratio envelopment approaches for monitoring bank performances. European Journal of Operational Research 1997, 98:250-268.
31. Leightner JE, Lovell CAK The impact of financial liberalization on the performance of Thai banks. Journal of Economics and Business 1998, 50:115-131.
32. Avkiran NK. The evidence on efficiency gains: the role of mergers and the benefits to the public. Journal of Banking & Finance 1999, 23:991-1013.
33. Avkiran NK. Rising productivity of Australian trading banks under deregulation 1986-1995. Journal of Economics and Finance 2000, 24:122-140.
34. Sturm JE, Williams B. Foreign bank entry, deregulation and bank efficiency: lessons from the Australian experience. Journal of Banking & Finance 2004, 28:1775-1799.
35. Avkiran NK. Removing the impact of environment with units-invariant efficient frontier analysis: an illustrative case study with intertemporal panel data. OMEGA, The International Journal of Management Science 2009, 37:535-544.
36. Avkiran NK, Thoraneenitiyan N. Purging data before productivity analysis. Journal of Business Research 2010, 63(3):294-302.
37. Avkiran NK. Banking on China. In Finance, October 2008; p. 28-9.
38. China Banking Association 2008. Full Members, accessed 28 April 2008,. http://www.china-cba.net/cbaenglish/eng2-2.htm.
39. KPMG. Retail banking in China: new frontiers, Hong Kong, March 2007.
40. PricewaterhouseCoopers. Foreign Banks in China, Hong Kong, June 2008.
41. Hartman TE, Storbeck JE, Byrnes P. Allocative efficiency in branch banking. European Journal of Operational Research 2001, 134:232-242.
42. Avkiran NK, Goto M. Benchmarking dividend policies of banks with a focus on share performance: a multi-period relative efficiency analysis. In: Proceedings of the Asian FA international conference, Brisbane, July 2009.
43. Chen Y, Ali AI. Output-input ratio analysis and DEA frontier. European Journal of Operational Research 2002, 142:476-479.
44. Berger AN, Humphrey DB. Efficiency of financial institutions: international survey and directions for future research. European Journal of Operational Research 1997, 98:175-212.
45. Ray S. Are some Indian banks too large? An examination of size efficiency in Indian banking. Journal of Productivity Analysis 2007, 27:41-56.
46. Al-Sharkas AA, Hassan MK, Lawrence S. The impact of mergers and acquisitions on the efficiency of the US banking industry: further evidence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 2008, 35:50-70.
47. Drake L, Hall MJB Simper R. Bank modeling methodologies: a comparative non-parametric analysis of efficiency in the Japanese banking sector. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money 2009, 19:1-15.
48. Avkiran NK. Developing foreign bank efficiency models for DEA grounded in finance theory. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 2006, 40:275-296.
49. Glawischnig M, Sommersguter-Reichmann M. Assessing the performance of alternative investments using non-parametric efficiency measurement approaches: is it convincing?. Journal of Banking & Finance 2010, 34:295-303.
50. Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 1984, 30:1078-1092.
51. Miller MH. Do the M&M propositions apply to banks?. Journal of Banking & Finance 1995, 19:483-489.