A modified super-efficiency DEA model for infeasibility

Journal of the Operational Research Society

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 276-281

  Cook, W D ^a   Liang, L ^b   Zha, Y ^b   Zhu, J ^c  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^c WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Data extremities; Infeasibility; Super efficiency

Indexed keywords

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING;

DATA EXTREMITIES; DECISION MAKING UNIT; INFEASIBILITY; OPTIMAL SOLUTIONS; ORIGINAL MODEL; RETURNS TO SCALE; SUPER EFFICIENCY; SUPER EFFICIENCY DEA MODELS;

EFFICIENCY;

EID: 58449086368     PISSN: 01605682     EISSN: 14769360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602544     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Andersen P and Petersen NC (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Mngt Sci 39: 1261-1264.
2. Banker RD, Charnes A and Cooper WW (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale efficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Mngt Sci 30: 1078-1092.
3. Banker RD, Das S and Datar SM (1989). Analysis of cost variances for management control in Hospitals. Res Gov Nonprofit Account 5: 268-291.
4. Charnes A, Cooper WW and Rhodes E (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Opl Res 2: 429-444.
5. Chen Y (2004). Ranking Efficient Units in DEA. Omega 32: 213-219.
6. Chen Y (2005). Measuring super-efficiency in DEA in the presence of infeasibility. Eur J Opl Res 161: 545-551.
7. Cook WD, Seiford LM and Zhu J (2004). Models for performance benchmarking: Measuring the effect of e-business activities on banking performance. Omega 32: 313-322.
8. Dulá JH and Hickman BL (1997). Effects of excluding the column being scored from the DEA envelopment LP technology matrix. J Opl Res Soc 48: 1001-1012.
9. Fare R and Grosskopf S (1992). Malmquist productivity indexes and Fisher ideal indexes. Econ J 102: 158-160.
10. Lovell CAK and Rouse APB (2003). Equivalent standard DEA models to provide super-efficiency scores. J Opl Res Soc 54: 101-108.
11. Rousseau JJ and Semple JH (1995). Two-person ratio efficiency games. Mngt Sci 41: 435-441.
12. Seiford LM and Zhu J (1998a). An acceptance system decision rule with data envelopment analysis. Comput Opns Res 25: 329-332.
13. Seiford LM and Zhu J (1998b). Sensitivity analysis of DEA models for simultaneous changes in all the data. J Opl Res Soc 49: 1060-1071.
14. Seiford LM and Zhu J (1999). Infeasibility of super-efficiency data envelopment analysis models. Infor 37: 174-187.
15. Zhu J (1996). Robustness of the efficient DMUs in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Opl Res 90: 451-460.