Recent results and future challenges for large scale particle-in-cell simulations of plasma-based accelerator concepts

Journal of Physics: Conference Series

Volumn 180, Issue 1, 2009, Pages

  Huang, C ^a   An, W ^a   Decyk, V K ^a   Lu, W ^a   Mori, W B ^a   Tsung, F S ^a   Tzoufras, M ^b   Morshed, S ^c   Antonsen, T ^c   Feng, B ^d   Katsouleas, T ^e   Fonseca, R A ^f   Martins, S F ^f   Vieira, J ^f   Silva, L O ^f   Esarey, E ^g   Geddes, C G R ^g   Leemans, W P ^g   Cormier Michel, E ^g   Vay, J L ^g   Bruhwiler, D L ^h   Cowan, B ^h   Cary, J R ^h,i   Paul, K ^h   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

^g LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^h TECH X CORPORATION   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS; PARTICLE BEAM DYNAMICS;

ELECTROMAGNETIC MODELING; ENVELOPE MODELS; FUTURE CHALLENGES; PARTICLE IN CELL CODES; PARTICLE-IN-CELL SIMULATIONS; PLASMA-BASED ACCELERATORS; QUASI STATIC MODELS; SIMULATION TECHNIQUE;

PLASMA SIMULATION;

EID: 77957038823     PISSN: 17426588     EISSN: 17426596     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/180/1/012005     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Tajima T, J M Dawson 1979 Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 267
2. Chen P et al 1985 Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 1537
3. Birdsall C K et al 1985 Plasma Physics via Computer Simulation (McGraw-Hill, New York)
4. Dawson J M 1983 Rev. Mod. Phys. 55 403
5. Nieter et al 2004 J. Comput. Phys.
6. Fonseca R A et al 2002 Lec. Notes Comput. Sci. 2329 342
7. Hemker R G 2000 PhD Thesis UCLA
8. Grote D P, A Friedman, J-L Vay, I Haber 2005 AIP Conf. Proc. vol 749 p 55
9. Paul K et al 2009 AIP Conf. Proc. vol 1086 p 315
10. Vay J-L 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 130405
11. Cowan B et al 2009 AIP Conf. Proc. vol 1086 p 208
12. Huang C et al 2006 J. Comput. Phys. 217 658
13. Martins S F et al in preparation
14. Lu W et al 2007 Phys. Rev. STAB 10 061301
15. Vay J-L et al These proceedings
16. Schroeder C B et al 2009 AIP Conf. Proc. vol 1086 p 309
17. E Cormier-Michel et al 2009 AIP Conf. Proc. vol 1086 p 297
18. Geddes C G R et al 2009 Proc. Particle Accel. Conf. (Vancouver, Canada) WE6RFP075
19. Geddes C G R et al SciDAC review, accepted
20. E Cormier-Michel et al in preparation
21. Geddes C G R et al 2008 Proc. Conf. on Applications of Accelerators in Research & Industry
22. Vay J-L et al 2009 Proc. Particle Accel. Conf. (Vancouver, Canada) TU1PBI04
23. Geddes C G R et al 2009 AIP Conf. Proc. vol 1086 p 12
24. Ruebel O et al 2008 Proc. Supercomputing Conf.
25. Ushizima D M et al 2008 Int. Conf. on Machine Learning & Applications
26. Whittum D H et al 1990 Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 2511
27. Kneip S et al 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 105006
28. Fonseca R A et al 2008 Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 50 124034
29. Martins J L et al in preparation
30. Kiselev S et al 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 135004
31. Seryi A et al 2009 Proc. Particle Accel. Conf. (Vancouver, Canada) WE6PFP081
32. Huang C et al 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 255001
33. Decyk V K 2007 Comput. Phys. Comm. 177 95
34. Huang C et al 2006 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 46 190-199
35. Feng B et al J. Comput. Phys. In Press, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.04.019
36. Huang C et al 2009 Proc. Particle Accel. Conf. (Vancouver, Canada) WE6RFP097
37. Tzoufras M et al 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 145002
38. Lu W et al 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 165002
39. Rosenzweig J B et al 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 195002
40. Vay J-L et al 2004 Phys. Plasmas 11