Multiple criteria assessment of substation conditions by pair-wise comparison of analytic hierarchy process

IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 3017-3023

  Tanaka, Hideaki ^a   Tsukao, Shigeyuki ^a   Yamashita, Daiki ^b   Niimura, Takahide ^b   Yokoyama, Ryuichi ^b  

^a TOKYO ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY   (Japan)

^b WASEDA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Aging; analytic hierarchy process; condition assessment; maintenance; pair wise comparison; replacement; substation equipment; transformers

Indexed keywords

AGING; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY; CONDITION ASSESSMENTS; PAIR-WISE COMPARISON; REPLACEMENT; SUBSTATION EQUIPMENT; TRANSFORMERS;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; ASSET MANAGEMENT; ELECTRIC SUBSTATIONS; EQUIPMENT; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; MAINTAINABILITY; POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS; STEEL BRIDGES; UNITS OF MEASUREMENT;

ANALYTIC EQUIPMENT;

EID: 77956992498     PISSN: 08858977     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRD.2010.2048437     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. R. E. Brown and B. G. Humphrey, "Asset management for transmission and distribution," IEEE Power Energy Mag., vol.3, no.3, pp. 39-45, May-Jun. 2005.
2. U. Zickler et al., "Asset management in distribution systems considering new knowledge on component reliability and damage cost," presented at the 15th Power Systems Computation Conf., Liege, Belgium, Aug. 2005, session 6, paper 6.
3. O. Tor and M. Shahidehpour, "Power distribution asset management," presented at the IEEE 2006 Power Engineering Society General Meeting, Montreal, QC, Canada, Jun. 2006.
4. T. Hjartarson, B. Jesus, D. T. Hughes, and R. M. Godfrey, "Development of health indices for asset condition assessment," in Proc. IEEE PES 2003 Transmission and Distribution Conf. and Expo., Sep. 2003, vol.2, pp. 541-544.
5. J. C. M. Lucio and R. C. G. Teive, "Fuzzy causal maps for asset management: An approach for problem-structuring and multi-criteria evaluation in electrical utilities," in Proc. 2007 IEEE Lausanne Power Tech Conf., Lausanne, Switzerland, Jul. 2007, pp. 2201-2206.
6. R. E. Brown and T. M. Taylor, "Modeling the impact of substations on distribution reliability," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol.14, no.1, pp. 349-354, Feb. 1999.
7. Z. Xiang, E. Gockenbach, V. Wasserberg, and H. Borsi, "Estimation of the lifetime of the electrical components in distribution networks," IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol.22, no.1, pp. 515-522, Jan. 2007.
8. P. Espie, G. W. Ault, G. M. Burt, and J. R. McDonald, "Multiple criteria decision making techniques applied to electricity distribution system planning," in IEE Proc. Gener., Trans. Distrib., Sep. 2003, vol.150, pp. 527-535.
9. M.Wang, A. J.Vandermaar, and K. D. Srivastava, "Reviewof condition assessment of power transformers in service," IEEE Elect. Insul. Mag., vol.18, no.6, pp. 12-25, Nov./Dec. 2002.
10. J. J. Smit and E. Gulski, "Condition assessment of transmission network infrastructures," in Proc. 2007 IEEE Lausanne Power Tech, Lausanne, Switzerland, Jul. 2007, pp. 2189-2194.
11. M. J. Mousavi and K. L. Butler-Purry, "A novel condition assessment system for underground distribution applications," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol.24, no.3, pp. 1115-1125, Aug. 2009.
12. J. Endrenyi et al., "The present status of maintenance strategies and the impact of maintenance on reliability," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol.16, no.4, pp. 638-646, Nov. 2001.
13. H. Ge and S. Asgarpoor, "An analytical method for optimum maintenance of substations," in Proc. 2008 T& D. IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conf. and Expo., Chicago, IL, Apr. 2008, pp. 1-6.
14. J. Ostergaard and A. N. Jensen, "Can we delay the replacement of this component-An asset management approach to the question," in Proc. CIRED 16th Int. Conf. and Exhib. Electricity Distribution 2001, Jun. 2001, vol.5.
15. T. Werner and C. Vetter, "Optimizing asset usage through integrated maintenance software systems," presented at the IEEE 2003 Power Engineering Society General Meeting, Toronto, ON, Canada, Jul. 2003.
16. F.Yang, "Multiobjective evolutionary optimization of substation maintenance using decision-varying Markov model," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol.23, no.3, pp. 1328-1335, Aug. 2008.
17. L. Willis and R. E. Brown, , J. D. McDonald, Ed., "Substation Asset Management," in Electric Power Substations Engineering. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2007, ch. 19.
18. T. L. Saaty, "The analytic hierarchy process: What it is and how it is used," Mathemat. Modell., vol.9, pp. 161-176, 1987.
19. D. E. Nordgard, J. Heggset, and E. Ostgulen, "Handling maintenance priorities using multi criteria decision making," in Proc. 2003 IEEE Power Tech Conf., Bologna, Italy, Jun. 2003, vol.3, p. 6.
20. N. Amyot, C. Hudon, M. Belec, L. Lamarre, and N. D. Nguyen, "Probabilistic assessment of generator failure using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP)," in Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS'08), Ricon, PR, May 2008, pp. 1-5.
21. A. Srividya, H. N. Suresh, and A. K. Verma, "Fuzzy AHP in prioritizing feeders for maintenance in nuclear power plants," in Proc. 2007 IEEE Int. Conf. Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Singapore, Dec. 2007, pp. 149-153. (Pubitemid 351370977)
22. R. R. Clarke, "Choosing an integrated resource plan for electric utilities: An analytic hierarchy approach," in Proc. 31st Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conf. (IECEC 96), Washington, DC, Aug. 1996, vol.3, pp. 1592-1597.
23. CESI, Working Group Report on Electricity Interconnections-Phase II: Methodology for the Assessment of new Infrastructures and Application to the Assessment of the Interconnection Projects Already Identified in the Baltic Area May 2009, European Commission, submitted to, available: [Online]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/energy/infrastructure/ bemip-en.htm
24. R. Haas and O. Meixner, An Illustrated Guide to the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Vienna, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences [Online]. Available: http://www.boku.ac.at/mi/
25. T. L. Saaty, "Relative Measurement and its Generalization in Decision Making: Why Pairwise Comparisons are Central in Mathematics for the Measurement of Intangible Factors-The Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process," in Review of the Royal Spanish Academy of Sciences ser. A, Jun. 2008, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 251-318 [Online]. Available: http://www.rac.es/ficheros/doc/00576. PDF.