The effect of anterior-posterior shear load on the wear of ProDisc-L TDR

European Spine Journal

Volumn 19, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1356-1362

  Vicars, R ^a   Hyde, P J ^a   Brown, T D ^b   Tipper, J L ^a   Ingham, E ^a   Fisher, J ^a   Hall, R M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

TDR; Total disc replacement; Wear ProDisc L

Indexed keywords

BOVINE SERUM ALBUMIN; POLYETHYLENE;

ANTERIOR POSTERIOR AXIS; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GRAVIMETRY; IMPLANT; LOADING TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCAR; SHEAR STRESS; SIMULATION; SUBSTITUTION THERAPY; TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; MATERIALS TESTING; POLYETHYLENE; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 77956943425     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1396-8     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Zigler J, Delamarter RB, Bae H, Sachs BL, Rashbaum RF, Ohnmeiss DD, Kanim LEA, Pradhan BB (2005) Lumbar total disc replacement: a 2 to 3 year report from centers in the United States clinical trial for the ProDisc-II prosthesis. In: Spine arthroplasty 5. Global symposium on motion preservation technology. Spine Arthroplasty Society, New York, USA
2. Lemaire JP, Skalli W, Lavaste F, Templier A, Mendes F, Diop A, Sauty V, Laloux E (1997) Intervertebral disc prosthesis: results and prospects for the year 2000. Clin Orthop Relat Res 337:64-76
3. Lee CK, Langrana NA (2004) A review of spinal fusion for degenerative disc disease: need for alternative treatment approach of disc arthroplasty? Spine J 4(6 Suppl 1):S173-S176
4. Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A (2001) 2001 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 26:2521-2532
5. Zigler J, Parkinson A, Guyer RD, Blumenthal SL, Ohnmeiss DD (2009) Re-operations in lumbar total disc replacement: experience with our first consecutive 800 cases. In: SAS09: Nineth annual global symposium on motion preservation technology, The International Society for the Advancement of Spinal Surgery, London
6. Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ianuzzi A, Lanman THMD, Isaza J, Albert T (2009) National Revision Burden for Lumbar Total Disc Arthroplasty in the United States. In: 55th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Orthopaedic Research Society, Las Vegas, NV
7. Fritzell P, Hagg O, Nordwall A (2003) Complications in lumbar fusion surgery for chronic low back pain: comparison of three surgical techniques used in a prospective randomized study. A report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Eur Spine J 12:178-189
8. Lewis G (1997) Polyethylene wear in total hip and knee arthroplasties. J Biomed Mater Res 38(1):55-75
9. Hallab NJ, Cunningham BW, Jacobs JJ (2003) Spinal implant debris-induced osteolysis. Spine 28(20):S125-S138
10. Punt I, Cleutjens JPM, de Bruin T, Willems PC, Kurtz SM, Van Rhijn L, Schurink GWH, Van Ooij A (2009) Periprosthetic tissue reactions observed at revision of total intervertebral disc arthroplasty. Biomaterials 30:2079-2084
11. Devin CJ, Myers TG, Kang JD (2008) Chronic failure of a lumbar total disc replacement with osteolysis. Report of a case with nineteen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(10):2230-2234
12. (2008) Implants for surgery-wear of total intevertebral spinal disc prostheses - Part 1: loading and displacement parameters for wear testing and corresponding environmental conditions for test, in BS ISO18192-1
13. (2005) Standard guide for functional, kinematic, and wear assessment of total disc prostheses. In: ASTM F 2423-05
14. Nechtow W, Hinter M, Bushelow M, Kaddick C (2006) IVD replacement mechanical performance depends strongly on input parameters. In: Orthopaedic Research Society Meeting. Chicago, IL
15. Wright TM, Cottrell JM, Punga K, Rawlinson JJ, Gunsallus DL (2006) Retrieval and wear analyses of ProDisc lumbar disc implants. In: Spine arthroplasty 6. Global symposium on Motion preservation technology, Spine Arthroplasty Society, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
16. Serhan H, Dooris A, Parsons ML, Ares PJ, Gabriel SM (2006) In vitro wear assessment of the Charite′ Artificial Disc according to ASTM recommendations. Spine 31(17):1900-1910
17. Grupp TM (2009) Biotribological evaluation of artificial disc arthroplasty devices: influence of loading and kinematic patterns during in vitro wear simulation. Eur Spine J 18:98-108
18. White AA, Panjabi MM (1990) Clinical biomechanics of the spine. 2nd edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia
19. Callaghan JP, Patla AE, McGill SM (1999) Low back three-dimensional joint forces, kinematics, and kinetics during walking. Clin Biomech 14(3):203-216
20. Kingma I, Staudenmann D, van Dienne JH (2007) Trunk muscle activation and associated lumbar spine joint shear force under different levels of external forward force applied to the trunk. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 17:14-24
21. Metzger MF, Bradford D, Lotz JC (2009) First generation TDR devices do not adequately resist shear in the lumbosacral spine. In: SAS09: Nineth annual global symposium on Motion preservation technology, The International Society for the Advancement of Spinal Surgery, London
22. Hall RM, Brown TD, Fisher J, Ingham E, Mendoza SA, Mayer HM (2006) Introduction to lumbar total disc replacement: factors that affect tribological performance. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J J Eng Tribol 220:775-786
23. Wang A, Polineni VK, Essner A, Stark C, Dumbleton JH (1999) The impact of lubricant protein concentration on the outcome of hip joint simulator testing. In: 45th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Orthopaedic Research Society, Anaheim, California
24. Vicars R, Fisher J, Heyes N, Birrell R, Hall RM (2007) Verification of a novel spine wear simulator. In: B.O.R. Society (ed) British Orthopaedic Research Society Annual Conference, Manchester, UK
25. (2005) Implants for surgery-wear of total intevertebral spinal disc prostheses - part 1: loading and displacement parameters for wear testing and corresponding environmental conditions for tests, in ISO/DIS 18192-1
26. Gatton ML, Pearcy MJ (1999) Kinematics and movement sequencing during flexion of the lumbar spine. Clin Biomech 14(6):376-383
27. Syczewska M, Oberg T, Karlsson D (1999) Segmental movements of the spine during treadmill walking with normal speed. Clin Biomech 14:384-388
28. Rawlinson JJ, Punga KP, Gunsallus KL, Bartel DL, Wright TM (2007) Wear simulation of the ProDisc-L disc replacement using adaptive finite element analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 7(2):165-173
29. Archard JF (1953) Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. J Appl Phys 24:981-988
30. Kang L, Galvin AL, Brown TD, Fisher J, Jin ZM (2008) Wear simulation of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene hip implants by incorporating the effects of cross-shear and contact pressure. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 222(7):1049-1064
31. Wang A, Stark C, Dumbleton JH (1996) Mechanistic and morphological origins of ultra-high weight molecular polyethylene wear debris in total joint replacement. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 210:141-155
32. Bullough PG, DiCarlo EF, Hansraj KK, Neves MC (1988) Pathologic studies of total joint replacement. Orthop Clin North Am 19(3):611-625
33. Shaheen A, Shepherd DET (2007) Lubrication regimes in lumbar total disc arthroplasty. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 221:621-627